Telechat Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6146-bis-10
review-ietf-v6ops-rfc6146-bis-10-artart-telechat-levine-2026-07-08-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6146-bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Telechat Review
Team ART Area Review Team (artart)
Deadline 2026-08-04
Requested 2026-07-02
Authors Marcelo Bagnulo , Philip Matthews , Jordi Palet Martinez
I-D last updated 2026-07-02 (Latest revision 2026-07-02)
Completed reviews Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Jim Reid (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Joerg Ott (diff)
Intdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Satoru Matsushima (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Tony Li (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -07 by John R. Levine (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -10 by Jim Reid
Artart Telechat review of -10 by John R. Levine
Assignment Reviewer John R. Levine
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6146-bis by ART Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/qSDcScyWwIV0VaeV7wXq5j3Od_E
Reviewed revision 10
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2026-07-08
review-ietf-v6ops-rfc6146-bis-10-artart-telechat-levine-2026-07-08-00
ARTART last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6146-bis

Reviewer: John Levine

Overall: Still ready with Issues

In the previous review I called out two issues, the confusing Figure one, and
the lack of DNSSEC concerns in the security section.  The second issue is fixed
with a short addition, the first unfortunately is not.

While the authors removed a few line segments from Figure 1, it doesn't help
since all of the same issues remain. Rather than trying to tweak it, the
authors could start over on a piece of paper with a sketch of the actual
topology, then transcribe it preferably into SVG or if need be ASCII art.