Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-klensin-idna-unicode-review-02

Request Review of draft-klensin-idna-unicode-review
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2019-08-30
Requested 2019-08-02
Authors Dr. John C. Klensin , Patrik Fältström
I-D last updated 2019-08-08
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Christopher A. Wood (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -02 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Joel M. Halpern
State Completed
Review review-klensin-idna-unicode-review-02-genart-lc-halpern-2019-08-08
Posted at
Reviewed revision 02 (document currently at 05)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2019-08-08
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-klensin-idna-unicode-review-02
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2019-08-08
IETF LC End Date: 2019-08-30
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: THis document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard

    This reviewer found the document quite readable and clear about what it was
    doing (with one minor issue noted below.)  The reviewer does not have the
    background to evaluate whether the technical substance is correct or
    incorrect, and leaves that to the community review.  The document is quite

Major issues: N/A

Minor issues:
    I would like to see a little more explicit text in section 3.2.  It was not
    until I reached the IANA considerations (section 8) that I realized that
    section 3.2 intended to mandate that the IESG create and where applicable
    use a broad review team for the new code point review.  I think a sentence
    or so along the lines of "Creation of this team when needed is a new
    responsibility placed on the IESG by this document." would have helped.

Nits/editorial comments: N/A