Last Call Review of draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16
review-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16-genart-lc-melnikov-2013-08-30-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document:  draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16
Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov	
Review Date: 2013-08-08
IETF LC End Date: 2013-08-16



Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational 


document (with nits).




Major issues:

-- None

Minor issues:

In 3.1:

Rules for Lexical Equivalence:
      Two GSMA IMEI URNs are equivalent if they have the same "imeival"
      value, and the same gsma-specifier-params values in the same
      sequential order, with the exception that the gsma-specifier-param
      "vers=0" is to be ignored for the purposes of comparison.  All of
      these comparisons are to be case-insensitive.

      Any identifier in GSMA namespaces can be compared using the normal
      mechanisms for percent-encoded UTF-8 strings.

UTF-8 reference (RFC 3629) is missing here.


A minor point:

10.2.  Informative references

   [8]   Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
         Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008.



This reference is Normative, because it is required to be understood in 


order to interpret ABNF syntax.