Last Call Review of draft-murchison-rfc8536bis-12
review-murchison-rfc8536bis-12-secdir-lc-roca-2024-04-09-00
Request | Review of | draft-murchison-rfc8536bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2024-04-14 | |
Requested | 2024-03-17 | |
Authors | Arthur David Olson , Paul Eggert , Kenneth Murchison | |
I-D last updated | 2024-04-09 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -12
by Vincent Roca
(diff)
Artart Last Call review of -12 by Marc Blanchet (diff) Genart Last Call review of -12 by Roni Even (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Vincent Roca |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-murchison-rfc8536bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/SkzpZqDD3VzemSg7G4xFjTg9H6w | |
Reviewed revision | 12 (document currently at 15) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2024-04-09 |
review-murchison-rfc8536bis-12-secdir-lc-roca-2024-04-09-00
Hello, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Summary: Ready I just have a minor comment regarding Section 6 "Security Considerations" and 7 "Privacy Considerations". The current draft briefly mentions RFC 7808 whereas this RFC has very detailed security and privacy sections and is a MUST READ. I suggest the authors refer to RFC 7808 in both sections for further security or privacy information in a convincing manner. Regards, Vincent