Last Call Review of draft-murdock-nato-nid-02
review-murdock-nato-nid-02-secdir-lc-laurie-2014-10-30-00

Request Review of draft-murdock-nato-nid
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2014-11-19
Requested 2014-10-23
Authors Aidan Murdock
Draft last updated 2014-10-30
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -02 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Ben Laurie (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -02 by Tina Tsou (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Ben Laurie 
State Completed
Review review-murdock-nato-nid-02-secdir-lc-laurie-2014-10-30
Reviewed rev. 02 (document currently at 03)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2014-10-30

Review
review-murdock-nato-nid-02-secdir-lc-laurie-2014-10-30

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Summary: ready.

The I-D says:

"This document introduces no additional security considerations beyond those associated with the use and resolution of URNs in general."

For a change, I agree.

It goes on to say:

"Distribution of NATO information in any form is subject to its
 security policies. Nonetheless, this specification is for public use
 and not subject to any NATO security policies."

Which seems to involve some magical thinking (how do those security policies magically follow the information?), but this is not a matter I think we should concern ourselves with.