Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-murdock-nato-nid-02
review-murdock-nato-nid-02-secdir-lc-laurie-2014-10-30-00

Request Review of draft-murdock-nato-nid
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2014-11-19
Requested 2014-10-23
Authors Aidan Murdock
I-D last updated 2014-10-30
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -02 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Ben Laurie (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -02 by Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU) (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Ben Laurie
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-murdock-nato-nid by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 02 (document currently at 03)
Result Ready
Completed 2014-10-30
review-murdock-nato-nid-02-secdir-lc-laurie-2014-10-30-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments
were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document
editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call
comments.

Summary: ready.

The I-D says:

"This document introduces no additional security considerations beyond those
associated with the use and resolution of URNs in general."

For a change, I agree.

It goes on to say:

"Distribution of NATO information in any form is subject to its
 security policies. Nonetheless, this specification is for public use
 and not subject to any NATO security policies."

Which seems to involve some magical thinking (how do those security policies
magically follow the information?), but this is not a matter I think we should
concern ourselves with.