Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-salgueiro-vcarddav-kind-device-06
review-salgueiro-vcarddav-kind-device-06-secdir-lc-weiler-2013-01-10-00

Request Review of draft-salgueiro-vcarddav-kind-device
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2013-01-08
Requested 2012-11-29
Authors Gonzalo Salgueiro , Joe Clarke , Peter Saint-Andre
I-D last updated 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2013-01-15)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -06 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Sam Weiler (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Sam Weiler
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-salgueiro-vcarddav-kind-device by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready
Completed 2013-01-10
review-salgueiro-vcarddav-kind-device-06-secdir-lc-weiler-2013-01-10-00
Summary: no objections.



There are very real security concerns, but the only surprise is that 


they're discussed only by reference.  The draft refers to the general 


vCard spec (RFC6350).  RFC6350 does an adequate job.  One might argue 


that vCards more devices are more likely to be used in automated and 


perhaps unfamiliar ways, so the ricks are greater than with vCards for 


humans.  But we let a similar doc (RFC6473) be published a year ago 


with this same sort of referral, so it's hard to make a case than 


anything needs to change here.




Thanks to the editors for the very readable doc.

-- Sam