Last Call Review of draft-tenoever-tao-retirement-02
review-tenoever-tao-retirement-02-secdir-lc-rose-2024-01-29-00
| Request | Review of | draft-tenoever-tao-retirement |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2024-02-22 | |
| Requested | 2024-01-25 | |
| Authors | Niels ten Oever , Greg Wood | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-06-21 (Latest revision 2024-02-26) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -03
by Susan Hares
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -02 by Kyle Rose (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -02 by Dan Romascanu (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Kyle Rose |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-tenoever-tao-retirement by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/nyu3IiOYazSMI3A4jkgp2z10zjA | |
| Reviewed revision | 02 (document currently at 04) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2024-01-29 |
review-tenoever-tao-retirement-02-secdir-lc-rose-2024-01-29-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document justifies TBD changes to how introductory material for IETF newcomers is to be maintained. It has no direct implications for the security or privacy of the internet or of IETF-authored protocols.