Last Call Review of draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-
review-weil-shared-transition-space-request-genart-lc-dupont-2011-11-01-00
| Request | Review of | draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2011-11-15 | |
| Requested | 2011-11-01 | |
| Authors | Jason Weil , Victor Kuarsingh , Chris Donley , Christopher Liljenstolpe , Marla Azinger | |
| Draft last updated | 2011-11-01 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -??
by
Francis Dupont
Genart Last Call review of -?? by Francis Dupont Genart Telechat review of -?? by Francis Dupont Secdir Telechat review of -?? by Yaron Sheffer Tsvdir Last Call review of -?? by Dan Wing |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Francis Dupont |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-weil-shared-transition-space-request-genart-lc-dupont-2011-11-01
|
|
| Completed | 2011-11-01 |
review-weil-shared-transition-space-request-genart-lc-dupont-2011-11-01-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-03.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20110827 IETF LC End Date: 20110916 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Almost Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None (but need feed back from IANA) Nits/editorial comments: - the text uses both assignment and allocation terms, they are not really equivalent so I recommend to ask IANA to check and if needed to fix the use of these terms. Anyway this document is for IANA! - authors' list page 1: LILJENSTOLPE -> Liljenstolpe - ToC page 2 and Appendix A page 10: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments - 4 page 6: Infrastructure provider use -> Infrastructure Provider use - 4 page 6: e.g. -> e.g., - 7 page 9: I don't like to get RFC 2119 in informative references - Authors' Addresses pages 11 and 12: * AU -> Australia * please remove empty Fax and URI * US -> USA (if it is really the other Vancouver :-) Regards Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr PS: IMHO this prefix could be a great help in NAT444 and similar device operation, so I support it. PPS: the Almost before Ready doesn't mean the document needs to be changed now, just the IANA should provide her comments first.