Skip to main content

Typographical Error in RFC 107
RFC 132

Document Type RFC - Unknown (April 1971)
Obsoleted by RFC 154
Updates RFC 107
Last updated 2013-03-02
RFC stream Legacy stream
Stream Legacy state (None)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state RFC 132 (Unknown)
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
RFC 132
NETWORK WORKING GROUP                                           Jim White
Request for Comments #132                                       UCSB
NIC #6708                                                       April 28, 1971

                     TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN RFC 107

On page 5 of RFC 107, at the end of the section titled 'V.
Flow Control', the partial sentence:

     Each of these numbers is interpreted as "the number
     of 128ths of the current allocation" to be returned
     if it is in the range zero to 128...

should read:

     ...if it is the range of zero to 127,...

That is, return al the appropriate allocation if and
only if the high-order of the left-most bit of the corresponding
fraction is 1.

       [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
     [ into the online RFC archives by Mohnish Harisinganey 5/97 ]

                                                                [Page 1]