Typographical Error in RFC 107
RFC 132
| Document | Type |
RFC
- Unknown
(April 1971)
Obsoleted by RFC 154
Updates RFC 107
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | |||
| Last updated | 2013-03-02 | ||
| RFC stream | Legacy stream | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Legacy state | (None) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | RFC 132 (Unknown) | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
RFC 132
NETWORK WORKING GROUP Jim White
Request for Comments #132 UCSB
NIC #6708 April 28, 1971
TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN RFC 107
______________________________
On page 5 of RFC 107, at the end of the section titled 'V.
Flow Control', the partial sentence:
Each of these numbers is interpreted as "the number
of 128ths of the current allocation" to be returned
if it is in the range zero to 128...
should read:
...if it is the range of zero to 127,...
---
That is, return al the appropriate allocation if and
only if the high-order of the left-most bit of the corresponding
fraction is 1.
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFC archives by Mohnish Harisinganey 5/97 ]
[Page 1]