Typographical Error in RFC 107
RFC 132
This RFC was published on the Legacy stream.
This RFC is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
| Document | Type |
RFC
- Unknown
(April 1971)
Obsoleted by RFC 154
Updates RFC 107
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | |||
| Last updated | 2013-03-02 | ||
| RFC stream | Legacy | ||
| Formats | |||
| IESG | Responsible AD | (None) | |
| Send notices to | (None) |
RFC 132
NETWORK WORKING GROUP Jim White
Request for Comments #132 UCSB
NIC #6708 April 28, 1971
TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN RFC 107
______________________________
On page 5 of RFC 107, at the end of the section titled 'V.
Flow Control', the partial sentence:
Each of these numbers is interpreted as "the number
of 128ths of the current allocation" to be returned
if it is in the range zero to 128...
should read:
...if it is the range of zero to 127,...
---
That is, return al the appropriate allocation if and
only if the high-order of the left-most bit of the corresponding
fraction is 1.
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFC archives by Mohnish Harisinganey 5/97 ]
[Page 1]