The PPP DECnet Phase IV Control Protocol (DNCP)
RFC 1762
Document | Type |
RFC
- Draft Standard
(March 1995)
Obsoletes RFC 1376
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Author | Steve Senum | ||
Last updated | 2013-03-02 | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Formats | |||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
IESG | Responsible AD | (None) | |
Send notices to | (None) |
RFC 1762
Network Working Group S. Senum Request for Comments: 1762 DigiBoard Obsoletes: 1376 March 1995 Category: Standards Track The PPP DECnet Phase IV Control Protocol (DNCP) Status of this Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Abstract The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) [1] provides a standard method of encapsulating Network Layer protocol information over point-to-point links. PPP also defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, and proposes a family of Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols. This document defines the NCP for establishing and configuring Digital's DNA Phase IV Routing protocol (DECnet Phase IV) over PPP. This document applies only to DNA Phase IV Routing messages (both data and control), and not to other DNA Phase IV protocols (MOP, LAT, etc). 1. Introduction There are two basic approaches to running the DNA Phase IV Routing protocol over a serial line: 1. The approach that several router vendors have taken which is to treat the serial link as an Ethernet, using the same data and control messages an Ethernet would use. 2. The approach defined by Digital, which uses DDCMP and slightly different control messages. This document will define a method that uses the first approach. Senum [Page 1] RFC 1762 PPP DNCP March 1995 2. Overview Of Phase IV DNA Protocols The Phase IV DNA protocols which act as data link clients are: o DNA Phase IV Routing The Phase IV Digital Network Architecture (DNA) Routing protocol is a network layer protocol providing services similar to that of DoD IP. It routes messages in Phase IV DECnet networks and manages the packet flow. The complete definition of the DNA Phase IV Routing protocol can be found in [2]. o DNA System Console The Digital Network Architecture (DNA) System Console protocol is a maintenance protocol providing low level access to a system for the functions of: . Identify processor . Read data link counters . Boot system . Console carrier (a general purpose i/o channel) The complete definition of the DNA System Console protocol can be found in [3]. o Digital Customer Use The Digital Customer Use protocol is a value reserved for use by Digital customers. It allocates a type for private use which will not conflict with Digital or other vendor protocols. o DNA Diagnostics The Digital Network Architecture (DNA) Diagnostics protocol is reserved to allow diagnostic software communications in parallel with other data link clients. o DNA Naming Service (DNS) The Digital Network Architecture Naming Service (DNS) provides a distributed naming service. It allows clients to register named objects and to bind a set of attributes to the objects in a distributed database. o DNA Time Service (DTS) The Digital Network Architecture Time Service (DTS) is a protocol providing global clock synchronization in a distributed environment. Senum [Page 2] RFC 1762 PPP DNCP March 1995 o DNA Load/Dump The Digital Network Architecture (DNA) Load/Dump protocol is a maintenance protocol for copying the contents of processor memory to or from a remote system. For example, a system manager can load an operating system into an unattended, remote system. The complete definition of the Phase IV DNA Load/Dump protocol can be found in [3]. o DNA Experimental Use The Digital Network Architecture (DNA) Experimental Use protocol allows Digital experimental protocols to share a data link with other data link clients. It is for use by Digital Equipment Corporation only. o DNA Communications Test The Digital Network Architecture (DNA) Communications Test protocol is a maintenance protocol for testing the data link communications path. The complete definition of the DNA Communications Test protocol can be found in [3]. o Digital Protocol X1 The Digital X1 protocol is a network layer protocol currently private to Digital. This document defines the NCP for establishing and configuring Digital's DNA Phase IV Routing protocol (DECnet Phase IV) over PPP. This document applies only to DNA Phase IV Routing messages (both data and control), and not to other DNA Phase IV protocols. 3. A PPP Network Control Protocol for DNA Phase IV Routing The DNA Phase IV Routing Control Protocol (DNCP) is responsible for configuring, enabling, and disabling the DNA Phase IV Routing protocol modules on both ends of the point-to-point link. DNCP uses the same packet exchange mechanism as the Link Control Protocol (LCP). DNCP packets may not be exchanged until PPP has reached the Network-Layer Protocol phase. DNCP packets received before this phase is reached should be silently discarded. The DNA Phase IV Routing Control Protocol is exactly the same as the Link Control Protocol [1] with the following exceptions: Frame Modifications The packet may utilize any modifications to the basic frame format which have been negotiated during the Link Establishment phase. Senum [Page 3] RFC 1762 PPP DNCP March 1995 Data Link Layer Protocol Field Exactly one DNCP packet is encapsulated in the Information field of a PPP Data Link Layer frame where the Protocol field indicates type hex 8027 (DNA Phase IV Control Protocol). Code field Only Codes 1 through 7 (Configure-Request, Configure-Ack, Configure-Nak, Configure-Reject, Terminate-Request, Terminate-Ack and Code-Reject) are used. Other Codes should be treated as unrecognized and should result in Code-Rejects. Timeouts DNCP packets may not be exchanged until PPP has reached the Network-Layer Protocol phase. An implementation should be prepared to wait for Authentication and Link Quality Determination to finish before timing out waiting for a Configure-Ack or other response. It is suggested that an implementation give up only after user intervention or a configurable amount of time. Configuration Option Types DNCP has no Configuration Options. 4. Sending DNA Phase IV Routing Packets Before any DNA Phase IV Routing packets may be communicated, PPP must reach the Network-Layer Protocol phase, and the DNA Phase IV Routing Control Protocol must reach the Opened state. Exactly one length field and one DNA Phase IV Routing packet are encapsulated in the information field of a PPP Data Link Layer frame where the Protocol field indicates type hex 0027 (DNA Phase IV Routing). The length field contains a count of the number of octets in the DNA Phase IV Routing packet. It is two octets in length itself, and is stored in VAX byte ordering, to be more consistent with DNA Phase IV Routing over Ethernet (i.e. least significant byte first). It is needed to disambiguate optional padding octets from real information. The maximum length of a DNA Phase IV Routing packet transmitted over a PPP link is the same as the maximum length of the Information field of a PPP data link layer frame minus 2 octets (for the Length field). Senum [Page 4] RFC 1762 PPP DNCP March 1995 The format of the packets themselves is the same as the format used over Ethernet, without the Ethernet header, Pad, and FCS fields. A summary of the information field is shown below. The fields are transmitted from left to right. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Length LSB | Length MSB | DATA | ... | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ... | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Length LSB Least significant byte of length field Length MSG Most significant byte of length field DATA DNA Phase IV Routing data, as specified in [2] 5. General Considerations When a topology change in the network occurs, DNA Phase IV Routing nodes immediately propagate changes via Level 1 and Level 2 Routing messages, with a 1 second minimum delay between updates. DNA Phase IV Routing nodes also periodically retransmit the complete Level 1 and Level 2 distance vectors to guard against data corruption in host memory, and (in the case of Ethernet) loss of packets due to media errors. Because Digital's serial links run a protocol that guarantees delivery of packets (DDCMP), the recommended default retransmit time is long (600 seconds), whereas for Ethernet, where packet delivery is not guaranteed, the recommended default is short (10 seconds), as documented in [2]. To achieve convergence of routes within a satisfactory time, the interval between updates should be based upon the error rate of underlying data link. As such, it is recommended that the time between routing updates be user configurable per PPP interface. The Hello timer and Listen timer should be set according to the recommendations for broadcast links (15 and 45 seconds, respectively). Senum [Page 5] RFC 1762 PPP DNCP March 1995 Routers MAY not send routing updates if the remote node connected via the PPP link is an endnode. Endnodes MUST discard all routing updates received over a PPP link. The type of a node (endnode versus routing) can be determined from the hello messages received from it. Security Considerations Security issues are not discussed in this memo. References [1] Simpson, W., "The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)", STD 51, RFC 1661, Daydreamer, July 1994. [2] Digital Equipment Corporation, "DNA Routing Layer Functional Specification", Version 2.0.0, Order No. AA-X435A-TK. [3] Digital Equipment Corporation, "DNA Maintenance Operations Functional Specification", Version 3.0.0, Order No. AA-X436A-TK. Acknowledgments Some of the text in this document is taken from previous documents produced by the Point-to-Point Protocol Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). The author wishes to thank Jim Muchow (Network Systems Corporation), and Arthur Harvey (Digital Equipment Corporation) for their input to this memo. Chair's Address The working group can be contacted via the current chair: Fred Baker Senior Software Engineer Cisco Systems 519 Lado Drive Santa Barbara, California 93111 Phone: (408) 526-4257 EMail: fred@cisco.com Senum [Page 6] RFC 1762 PPP DNCP March 1995 Author's Address Questions about this memo can also be directed to the author: Steven J. Senum DigiBoard 6400 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Phone: (612) 943-9020 EMail: sjs@digibd.com Senum [Page 7]