Textual Conventions for Additional High Capacity Data Types
RFC 2856

Network Working Group                                        A. Bierman
Request for Comments: 2856                                K. McCloghrie
Category: Standards Track                           Cisco Systems, Inc.
                                                             R. Presuhn
                                                     BMC Software, Inc.
                                                              June 2000

      Textual Conventions for Additional High Capacity Data Types

Status of this Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

   This memo specifies new textual conventions for additional high
   capacity data types, intended for SNMP implementations which already
   support the Counter64 data type. The definitions contained in this
   document represent a short term solution which may be deprecated in
   the future.

Table of Contents

   1 The SNMP Management Framework .................................  2
   2 Overview ......................................................  3
   2.1 Short Term and Long Term Objectives .........................  3
   2.2 Limitations of the Textual Convention Approach ..............  3
   3 New Textual Conventions .......................................  4
   3.1 CounterBasedGauge64 .........................................  4
   3.2 ZeroBasedCounter64 ..........................................  4
   4 Definitions ...................................................  4
   5 Intellectual Property .........................................  7
   6 References ....................................................  7
   7 Security Considerations .......................................  9
   8 Authors' Addresses ............................................  9
   9 Full Copyright Statement ...................................... 10

Bierman, et al.             Standards Track                     [Page 1]
RFC 2856                High Capacity Data Types               June 2000

1.  The SNMP Management Framework

   The SNMP Management Framework presently consists of five major
   components:

   o   An overall architecture, described in RFC 2571 [RFC2571].

   o   Mechanisms for describing and naming objects and events for the
       purpose of management. The first version of this Structure of
       Management Information (SMI) is called SMIv1 and described in STD
       16, RFC 1155 [RFC1155], STD 16, RFC 1212 [RFC1212] and RFC 1215
       [RFC1215].  The second version, called SMIv2, is described in STD
       58, RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC 2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58,
       RFC 2580 [RFC2580].

   o   Message protocols for transferring management information. The
       first version of the SNMP message protocol is called SNMPv1 and
       described in STD 15, RFC 1157 [RFC1157].  A second version of the
       SNMP message protocol, which is not an Internet standards track
       protocol, is called SNMPv2c and described in RFC 1901 [RFC1901]
       and RFC 1906 [RFC1906].  The third version of the message
       protocol is called SNMPv3 and described in RFC 1906 [RFC1906],
       RFC 2572 [RFC2572] and RFC 2574 [RFC2574].

   o   Protocol operations for accessing management information. The
       first set of protocol operations and associated PDU formats is
       described in STD 15, RFC 1157 [RFC1157].  A second set of
       protocol operations and associated PDU formats is described in
       RFC 1905 [RFC1905].

   o   A set of fundamental applications described in RFC 2573 [RFC2573]
       and the view-based access control mechanism described in RFC 2575
       [RFC2575].

   A more detailed introduction to the current SNMP Management Framework
   can be found in RFC 2570 [RFC2570].

   Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
   the Management Information Base or MIB.  Objects in the MIB are
   defined using the mechanisms defined in the SMI.

   This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2.  The
   textual conventions defined in this MIB module cannot be translated
   to SMIv1 since the Counter64 type does not exist in SMIv1.

Bierman, et al.             Standards Track                     [Page 2]
RFC 2856                High Capacity Data Types               June 2000

2.  Overview

   The Structure of Management Information [RFC2578] does not explicitly
   address the question of how to represent integer objects other than
   counters that would require up to 64 bits to provide the necessary
   range and precision.  There are MIBs in progress targeted for the
   standards track, which need such data types. This memo specifies a
   short term solution, using textual conventions, to meet these needs.

2.1.  Short Term and Long Term Objectives

   There is an immediate need to provide a Gauge64 data type, similar in
   semantics to the Gauge32 data type, in order to support common data
   representations such as:

   -  a snapshot of a Counter64 at a given moment, e.g., history ring
      buffer

   -  the difference between two Counter64 values

   There is also an immediate need for a 64-bit zero-based counter type,
   similar in semantics to the ZeroBasedCounter32 TC defined in the
   RMON-2 MIB [RFC2021].

   Both of these textual conventions should use a base type of Gauge64
   or Unsigned64, but such a base type is not available.  Until such a
   base type is defined and deployed, these temporary textual
   conventions (which use a base type of Counter64) will be used in MIBs
   which require unsigned 64-bit data types.

   In order to be backward compatible with existing implementations of
   Counter64, the ASN.1 encoding of unsigned 64-bit data types must be
   identical to the encoding of Counter64 objects, i.e., identified by
   the [APPLICATION 6] ASN.1 tag.

   Note that the textual conventions defined in this document represent
   a limited and short-term solution to the problem.  These textual
   conventions may be deprecated as a long term solution is defined and
   deployed to replace them.  A MIB object which uses either of these
   textual conventions may also eventually have to be deprecated.

2.2.  Limitations of the Textual Convention Approach

   New unsigned data types with textual conventions based on the
   Counter64 tag, instead of a new (or other existing) ASN.1 tag have
   some limitations:

Bierman, et al.             Standards Track                     [Page 3]
RFC 2856                High Capacity Data Types               June 2000

   -  The MAX-ACCESS of the TC must be read-only, because the MAX-ACCESS
      of the underlying Counter64 type is read-only.

   -  No sub-range can be specified on the TC-derived types, because
      sub-ranges are not allowed on Counter64 objects.

   -  No DEFVAL clause can be specified for the TC-derived types,
      because DEFVALs are not allowed on Counter64 objects.

   -  The TC-derived types cannot be used in an INDEX clause, because
      there is no INDEX clause mapping defined for objects of type
      Counter64.

3.  New Textual Conventions

   The following textual conventions are defined to support unsigned
   64-bit data types.

3.1.  CounterBasedGauge64

   This textual convention defines a 64-bit gauge, but defined with
   Counter64 syntax, since no Gauge64 or Unsigned64 base type is
   available in SMIv2.

   This TC is used for storing the difference between two Counter64
   values, or simply storing a snapshot of a Counter64 value at a given
   moment in time.

3.2.  ZeroBasedCounter64

   This textual convention defines a 64-bit counter with an initial
   value of zero, instead of an arbitrary initial value.

   This TC is used for counter objects in tables which are instantiated
   by management application action.

4. Definitions

   HCNUM-TC DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

   IMPORTS
     MODULE-IDENTITY, mib-2, Counter64
         FROM SNMPv2-SMI
     TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
         FROM SNMPv2-TC;

   hcnumTC MODULE-IDENTITY
     LAST-UPDATED "200006080000Z"

Bierman, et al.             Standards Track                     [Page 4]
RFC 2856                High Capacity Data Types               June 2000

     ORGANIZATION "IETF OPS Area"
     CONTACT-INFO
           "        E-mail: mibs@ops.ietf.org
                    Subscribe: majordomo@psg.com
                      with msg body: subscribe mibs

                    Andy Bierman
                    Cisco Systems Inc.
                    170 West Tasman Drive
                    San Jose, CA 95134 USA
                    +1 408-527-3711
                    abierman@cisco.com

                    Keith McCloghrie
                    Cisco Systems Inc.
                    170 West Tasman Drive
                    San Jose, CA 95134 USA
                    +1 408-526-5260
                    kzm@cisco.com

                    Randy Presuhn
                    BMC Software, Inc.
                    Office 1-3141
                    2141 North First Street
                    San Jose,  California 95131 USA
                    +1 408 546-1006
                    rpresuhn@bmc.com"
     DESCRIPTION
           "A MIB module containing textual conventions
            for high capacity data types. This module
            addresses an immediate need for data types not directly
            supported in the SMIv2. This short-term solution
            is meant to be deprecated as a long-term solution
            is deployed."
     REVISION        "200006080000Z"
     DESCRIPTION
           "Initial Version of the High Capacity Numbers
            MIB module, published as RFC 2856."
     ::= { mib-2 78 }

   CounterBasedGauge64 ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
     STATUS       current
     DESCRIPTION
           "The CounterBasedGauge64 type represents a non-negative
           integer, which may increase or decrease, but shall never
           exceed a maximum value, nor fall below a minimum value. The
           maximum value can not be greater than 2^64-1
           (18446744073709551615 decimal), and the minimum value can

Bierman, et al.             Standards Track                     [Page 5]
RFC 2856                High Capacity Data Types               June 2000

           not be smaller than 0.  The value of a CounterBasedGauge64
           has its maximum value whenever the information being modeled
           is greater than or equal to its maximum value, and has its
           minimum value whenever the information being modeled is
           smaller than or equal to its minimum value.  If the
           information being modeled subsequently decreases below
           (increases above) the maximum (minimum) value, the
           CounterBasedGauge64 also decreases (increases).

           Note that this TC is not strictly supported in SMIv2,
           because the 'always increasing' and 'counter wrap' semantics
           associated with the Counter64 base type are not preserved.
           It is possible that management applications which rely
           solely upon the (Counter64) ASN.1 tag to determine object
           semantics will mistakenly operate upon objects of this type
           as they would for Counter64 objects.

           This textual convention represents a limited and short-term
           solution, and may be deprecated as a long term solution is
           defined and deployed to replace it."
     SYNTAX Counter64

   ZeroBasedCounter64 ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
     STATUS current
     DESCRIPTION
           "This TC describes an object which counts events with the
           following semantics: objects of this type will be set to
           zero(0) on creation and will thereafter count appropriate
           events, wrapping back to zero(0) when the value 2^64 is
           reached.

           Provided that an application discovers the new object within
           the minimum time to wrap it can use the initial value as a
           delta since it last polled the table of which this object is
           part.  It is important for a management station to be aware
           of this minimum time and the actual time between polls, and
           to discard data if the actual time is too long or there is
           no defined minimum time.

           Typically this TC is used in tables where the INDEX space is
           constantly changing and/or the TimeFilter mechanism is in
           use.

           Note that this textual convention does not retain all the
           semantics of the Counter64 base type. Specifically, a
           Counter64 has an arbitrary initial value, but objects
           defined with this TC are required to start at the value

Bierman, et al.             Standards Track                     [Page 6]
RFC 2856                High Capacity Data Types               June 2000

           zero.  This behavior is not likely to have any adverse
           effects on management applications which are expecting
           Counter64 semantics.

           This textual convention represents a limited and short-term
           solution, and may be deprecated as a long term solution is
           defined and deployed to replace it."
     SYNTAX Counter64

   END

5.  Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
   has made any effort to identify any such rights.  Information on the
   IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
   standards- related documentation can be found in BCP-11.  Copies of
   claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of
   licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to
   obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
   proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
   be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF Executive
   Director.

6.  References

   [RFC1155]   Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification
               of Management Information for TCP/IP-based Internets",
               STD 16, RFC 1155, May 1990.

   [RFC1157]   Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M. and J. Davin,
               "Simple Network Management Protocol", STD 15, RFC 1157,
               May 1990.

   [RFC1212]   Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Concise MIB Definitions",
               STD 16, RFC 1212, March 1991.

   [RFC1215]   Rose, M., "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with
               the SNMP", RFC 1215, March 1991.

Bierman, et al.             Standards Track                     [Page 7]
RFC 2856                High Capacity Data Types               June 2000

   [RFC1901]   Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser,
               "Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2", RFC 1901,
               January 1996.

   [RFC1905]   Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser,
               "Protocol Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network
               Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1905, January 1996.

   [RFC1906]   Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser,
               "Transport Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network
               Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1906, January 1996.

   [RFC2021]   Waldbusser, S., "Remote Network Monitoring MIB (RMON-2)",
               RFC 2021, January 1997.

   [RFC2026]   Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
               3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996.

   [RFC2570]   Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D. and B. Stewart,
               "Introduction to Version 3 of the Internet-standard
               Network Management Framework", RFC 2570, April 1999.

   [RFC2571]   Harrington, D., Presuhn, R. and B. Wijnen, "An
               Architecture for Describing SNMP Management Frameworks",
               RFC 2571, April 1999.

   [RFC2572]   Case, J., Harrington D., Presuhn R. and B. Wijnen,
               "Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple
               Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 2572, April
               1999.

   [RFC2573]   Levi, D., Meyer, P. and B. Stewart, "SNMPv3
               Applications", RFC 2573, April 1999.

   [RFC2574]   Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model
               (USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network Management
               Protocol (SNMPv3)", RFC 2574, April 1999.

   [RFC2575]   Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R. and K. McCloghrie, "View-based
               Access Control Model (VACM) for the Simple Network
               Management Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 2575, April 1999.

   [RFC2578]   McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
               Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management
               Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April
               1999.

Bierman, et al.             Standards Track                     [Page 8]
RFC 2856                High Capacity Data Types               June 2000

   [RFC2579]   McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
               Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for
               SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.

   [RFC2580]   McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
               Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for
               SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999.

7.  Security Considerations

   This module does not define any management objects. Instead, it
   defines a set of textual conventions which may be used by other MIB
   modules to define management objects.

   Meaningful security considerations can only be written in the modules
   that define management objects.

8.  Authors' Addresses

   Andy Bierman
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   170 West Tasman Drive
   San Jose, CA 95134 USA

   Phone: +1 408-527-3711
   EMail: abierman@cisco.com

   Keith McCloghrie
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   170 West Tasman Drive
   San Jose, CA 95134 USA

   Phone: +1 408-526-5260
   EMail: kzm@cisco.com

   Randy Presuhn
   BMC Software, Inc.
   Office 1-3141
   2141 North First Street
   San Jose,  California 95131 USA

   Phone: +1 408 546-1006
   EMail: rpresuhn@bmc.com

Bierman, et al.             Standards Track                     [Page 9]
RFC 2856                High Capacity Data Types               June 2000

9.  Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000).  All Rights Reserved.

   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
   English.

   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.

Bierman, et al.             Standards Track                    [Page 10]