Using the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) in Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP)
RFC 3288
| Document | Type |
RFC - Proposed Standard
(June 2002; No errata)
Obsoleted by RFC 4227
Was draft-etal-beep-soap (individual)
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Eamon O'Tuathail , Marshall Rose | ||
| Last updated | 2013-03-02 | ||
| Stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | plain text html pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex | ||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||
| IESG | IESG state | RFC 3288 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
Network Working Group E. O'Tuathail
Request for Comments: 3288 Clipcode.com
Category: Standards Track M. Rose
Dover Beach Consulting, Inc.
June 2002
Using the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP)
in Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP)
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This memo specifies a Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) binding to
the Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol core (BEEP). A SOAP binding
describes how SOAP messages are transmitted in the network.
The SOAP is an XML-based (extensible markup language) messaging
protocol used to implement a wide variety of distributed messaging
models. It defines a message format and describes a variety of
message patterns, including, but not limited to, RPC, asynchronous
event notification, unacknowledged messages, and forwarding via SOAP
intermediaries.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. BEEP Profile Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1 Profile Initialization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. SOAP Message Packages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4. SOAP Message Patterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.1 One-way Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.2 Request-Response Exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.3 Request/N-Responses Exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5. URL Schemes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
5.1 The soap.beep URL Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
5.1.1 Resolving IP/TCP Address Information . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
5.2 The soap.beeps URL Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
6. Registration Templates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
6.1 SOAP Profile Feature Registration Template . . . . . . . . . 12
7. Initial Registrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
7.1 Registration: The SOAP Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
7.2 Registration: The soap.beep URL Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . 14
7.3 Registration: The soap.beeps URL Scheme . . . . . . . . . . 15
7.4 Registration: The System (Well-Known) TCP port number for
SOAP over BEEP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
1. Introduction
This memo specifies how SOAP 1.1 envelopes[1] are transmitted using a
BEEP profile[2]. In the W3C, the XMLP effort is evolving SOAP.
Accordingly, this memo provides a mechanism for negotiating the use
of new features.
Throughout this memo, the term "envelope" refers to the "SOAP-
Env:Envelope" element defined in Section 4 of [1]. Further, the
terms "peer", "client", "server", "one-to-one", and "one-to-many" are
used in the context of BEEP. In particular, Sections 2.1 and 2.1.1
of [2] discuss BEEP roles and exchange styles.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
2. BEEP Profile Identification
The BEEP profile for SOAP is identified as
http://iana.org/beep/soap
in the BEEP "profile" element during channel creation.
In BEEP, when the first channel is successfully created, the
"serverName" attribute in the "start" element identifies the "virtual
host" associated with the peer acting in the server role, e.g.,
<start number='1' serverName='stockquoteserver.example.com'>
<profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/soap' />
</start>
The "serverName" attribute is analagous to HTTP's "Host" request-
header field (c.f., Section 14.23 of [3]).
There are two states in the BEEP profile for SOAP, "boot" and
"ready":
o In the "boot" state, the peer requesting the creation of the
channel sends a "bootmsg" (either during channel initialization or
in a "MSG" message).
* If the other peer sends a "bootrpy" (either during channel
initialization or in a "RPY" message), then the "ready" state
is entered
* Otherwise, the other peer sends an "error" (either during
channel initialization or in a "ERR" message), then no state
change occurs.
o In the "ready" state, either peer begins a SOAP message pattern by
sending a "MSG" message containing an envelope. The other peer
completes the message pattern either by:
* sending back a "RPY" message containing an envelope; or,
* sending back zero or more "ANS" messages, each containing an
envelope, followed by a "NUL" message.
Regardless, no state change occurs.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
2.1 Profile Initialization
The boot message is used for two purposes:
resource identification: each channel bound to the BEEP profile
for SOAP provides access to a single resource (a network data
object or service).
feature negotiation: if new features of SOAP (such as compression)
emerge, their use can be negotiated.
The DTD syntax for the boot message and its response are:
<!ELEMENT bootmsg EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST bootmsg
resource CDATA #REQUIRED
features NMTOKENS "">
<!ELEMENT bootrpy EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST bootrpy
features NMTOKENS "">
The boot message contains a mandatory and an optional attribute:
o the "resource" attribute, which is analagous to HTTP's "abs_path"
Request-URI parameter (c.f., Section 5.1.2 of [3]); and,
o the "features" attribute, which, if present, contains one or more
feature tokens, each indicating an optional feature of the BEEP
profile for SOAP that is being requested for possible use over the
channel.
Section 6.1 defines a registration template for optional features.
If the peer acting in the server role recognizes the requested
resource, it replies with the boot response that contains one
optional attribute:
o the "features" attribute, if present, contains a subset of the
feature tokens in the boot message, indicating which features may
be used over the channel. (If not present or empty, then no
features may be used.)
Otherwise, if the boot message is improperly formed, or if the
requested resource isn't recognized, the peer acting in the server
role replies with an error message (c.f., Section 7.1 of [2]).
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
Typically, the boot message and its response are exchanged during
channel initialization (c.f., Section 2.3.1.2 of [2]).
For example, here the boot message and its response are exchanged
during channel initialization:
C: <start number='1' serverName='stockquoteserver.example.com'>
C: <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/soap'>
C: <![CDATA[<bootmsg resource='/StockQuote' />]]>
C: </profile>
C: </start>
S: <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/soap'>
S: <![CDATA[<bootrpy />]]>
S: </profile>
The channel bound to the BEEP profile for SOAP is now in the "ready"
state.
Alternatively, here is an example in which the boot exchange is
unsuccessful:
C: <start number='1' serverName='stockquoteserver.example.com'>
C: <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/soap'>
C: <![CDATA[<bootmsg resource='/StockPick' />]]>
C: </profile>
C: </start>
S: <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/soap'>
S: <![CDATA[<error code='550'>resource not
S: supported</error>]]>
S: </profile>
Although the channel was created successfully, it remains in the
"boot" state.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
3. SOAP Message Packages
The BEEP profile for SOAP transmits envelopes encoded as UTF-8 using
the media type "application/xml"[4], e.g.,
MSG 1 1 . 0 364
Content-Type: application/xml
<SOAP-ENV:Envelope
xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
<SOAP-ENV:Body>
<m:GetLastTradePrice xmlns:m="Some-URI">
<symbol>DIS</symbol>
</m:GetLastTradePrice>
</SOAP-ENV:Body>
</SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
END
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
In addition, the BEEP profile for SOAP also allows envelopes to be
transmitted as the root part of a "multipart/related"[5] content, and
with subordinate parts referenced using the rules of Section 3 of [6]
(i.e., using either the "Content-ID:"[7] or "Content-Location:"[8]
headers), e.g.,
MSG 1 2 . 364 668
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="MIME_boundary";
type=application/xml;
start="<claim061400a.xml@claiming-it.com>"
--MIME_boundary
Content-Type: application/xml
Content-ID: <claim061400a.xml@claiming-it.com>
<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<SOAP-ENV:Envelope
xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<SOAP-ENV:Body>
..
<theSignedForm href="cid:claim061400a.tiff@claiming-it.com" />
..
</SOAP-ENV:Body>
</SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
--MIME_boundary
Content-Type: image/tiff
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-ID: <claim061400a.tiff@claiming-it.com>
...binary TIFF image...
--MIME_boundary--
END
Consistent with Section 2 of [6], it is strongly recommended that the
multipart contain a "start" parameter, and that the root part contain
a "Content-ID:" header. However, because BEEP provides an 8bit-wide
path, a "transformative" Content-Transfer-Encoding (e.g., "base64" or
"quoted-printable") should not be used. Further note that MIME[9]
requires that the value of the "Content-ID" header be globally
unique.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
4. SOAP Message Patterns
4.1 One-way Message
A one-way message involves sending a message without any response
being returned.
The BEEP profile for SOAP achieves this using a one-to-many exchange,
in which the client sends a "MSG" message containing an envelope, and
the server immediately sends back a "NUL" message, before processing
the contents of the envelope.
4.2 Request-Response Exchange
A request/response exchange involves sending a request, which results
in a response being returned.
The BEEP profile for SOAP achieves this using a one-to-one exchange,
in which the client sends a "MSG" message containing an envelope, and
the server sends back a "RPY" message containing an envelope.
Finally, the BEEP profile for SOAP does not use the "ERR" message for
SOAP faults when performing one-to-one exchanges -- whatever response
is generated by the server is always returned in the "RPY" message.
4.3 Request/N-Responses Exchange
A request/N-responses exchange involves sending a request, which
results in zero or more responses being returned.
The BEEP profile for SOAP achieves this using a one-to-many exchange,
in which the client sends a "MSG" message containing an envelope, and
the server sends back zero or more "ANS" messages, each containing an
envelope, followed by a "NUL" message.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
5. URL Schemes
This memo defines two URL schemes, "soap.beep" and "soap.beeps",
which identify the use of SOAP over BEEP over TCP. Note that, at
present, a "generic" URL scheme for SOAP is not defined.
5.1 The soap.beep URL Scheme
The "soap.beep" URL scheme uses the "generic URI" syntax defined in
Section 3 of [10], specifically:
o the value "soap.beep" is used for the scheme component; and,
o the server-based naming authority defined in Section 3.2.2 of [10]
is used for the authority component.
o the path component maps to the "resource" component of the boot
message sent during profile initialization (if absent, it defaults
to "/").
The values of both the scheme and authority components are case-
insensitive.
For example, the URL
soap.beep://stockquoteserver.example.com/StockQuote
might result in the example shown in Section 2.1.
5.1.1 Resolving IP/TCP Address Information
The "soap.beep" URL scheme indicates the use of the BEEP profile for
SOAP running over TCP/IP.
If the authority component contains a domain name and a port number,
e.g.,
soap.beep://stockquoteserver.example.com:1026
then the DNS is queried for the A RRs corresponding to the domain
name, and the port number is used directly.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
If the authority component contains a domain name and no port number,
e.g.,
soap.beep://stockquoteserver.example.com
the SRV algorithm[11] is used with a service parameter of "soap-beep"
and a protocol parameter of "tcp" to determine the IP/TCP addressing
information. If no appropriate SRV RRs are found (e.g., for "_soap-
beep._tcp.stockquoteserver.example.com"), then the DNS is queried for
the A RRs corresponding to the domain name and the port number used
is assigned by the IANA for the registration in Section 7.4.
If the authority component contains an IP address, e.g.,
soap.beep://10.0.0.2:1026
then the DNS is not queried, and the IP address is used directly. If
a port number is present, it is used directly; otherwise, the port
number used is assigned by the IANA for the registration in Section
7.4.
While the use of literal IPv6 addresses in URLs is discouraged, if a
literal IPv6 address is used in a "soap.beep" URL, it must conform to
the syntax specified in [12].
5.2 The soap.beeps URL Scheme
The "soap.beeps" URL scheme is identical, in all ways, to the
"soap.beep" URL scheme specified in Section 5.1, with the exception
that prior to starting the BEEP profile for SOAP, the BEEP session
must be tuned for privacy. In particular, note that both URL schemes
use the identical algorithms and parameters for address resolution as
specified in Section 5.1.1 (e.g., the same service name for SRV
lookups, the same port number for TCP, and so on).
There are two ways to perform privacy tuning on a BEEP session,
either:
o a transport security profile may be successfully started; or,
o a user authentication profile that supports transport security may
be successfully started.
Regardless, upon completion of the negotiation process, a tuning
reset occurs in which both BEEP peers issue a new greeting. Consult
Section 3 of [2] for an example of how a BEEP peer may choose to
issue different greetings based on whether privacy is in use.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
6. Registration Templates
6.1 SOAP Profile Feature Registration Template
When a feature for the BEEP profile for SOAP is registered, the
following information is supplied:
Feature Identification: specify a string that identifies this
feature. Unless the feature is registered with the IANA, the
feature's identification must start with "x-".
Feature Semantics: specify the semantics of the feature.
Contact Information: specify the electronic contact information for
the author of the feature.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
7. Initial Registrations
7.1 Registration: The SOAP Profile
Profile Identification: http://iana.org/beep/soap
Messages exchanged during Channel Creation: bootmsg, bootrpy
Messages starting one-to-one exchanges: bootmsg, SOAP-Env:Envelope
Messages in positive replies: bootrpy, SOAP-Env:Envelope
Messages in negative replies: error
Messages in one-to-many exchanges: SOAP-Env:Envelope
Message Syntax: SOAP-Env:Envelope as defined in Section 4 of [1] and
[6]
Message Semantics: c.f., [1]
Contact Information: Eamon O'Tuathail <eamon.otuathail@clipcode.com>,
Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
7.2 Registration: The soap.beep URL Scheme
URL scheme name: soap.beep
URL scheme syntax: c.f., Section 5.1
Character encoding considerations: c.f., the "generic URI" syntax
defined in Section 3 of [10]
Intended usage: identifies a SOAP resource made available using the
BEEP profile for SOAP
Applications using this scheme: c.f., "Intended usage", above
Interoperability considerations: n/a
Security Considerations: c.f., Section 8
Relevant Publications: c.f., [1], [6], and [2]
Contact Information: Eamon O'Tuathail <eamon.otuathail@clipcode.com>,
Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Author/Change controller: the IESG
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
7.3 Registration: The soap.beeps URL Scheme
URL scheme name: soap.beeps
URL scheme syntax: c.f., Section 5.2
Character encoding considerations: c.f., the "generic URI" syntax
defined in Section 3 of [10]
Intended usage: identifies a SOAP resource made available using the
BEEP profile for SOAP after the BEEP session has been tuned for
privacy
Applications using this scheme: c.f., "Intended usage", above
Interoperability considerations: n/a
Security Considerations: c.f., Section 8
Relevant Publications: c.f., [1], [6], and [2]
Contact Information: Eamon O'Tuathail <eamon.otuathail@clipcode.com>,
Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Author/Change controller: the IESG
7.4 Registration: The System (Well-Known) TCP port number for SOAP over
BEEP
Protocol Number: TCP
Message Formats, Types, Opcodes, and Sequences: c.f., Section 2.1
Functions: c.f., [1]
Use of Broadcast/Multicast: none
Proposed Name: SOAP over BEEP
Short name: soap-beep
Contact Information: Eamon O'Tuathail <eamon.otuathail@clipcode.com>,
Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
8. Security Considerations
Although service provisioning is a policy matter, at a minimum, all
implementations must provide the following tuning profiles:
for authentication: http://iana.org/beep/SASL/DIGEST-MD5
for confidentiality: http://iana.org/beep/TLS (using the
TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA cipher)
for both: http://iana.org/beep/TLS (using the
TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA cipher supporting client-side
certificates)
Further, implementations may choose to offer MIME-based security
services providing message integrity and confidentiality, such as
OpenPGP[13] or S/MIME[14].
Regardless, consult [2]'s Section 9 for a discussion of BEEP-specific
security issues.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
References
[1] Box, D., Ehnebuske, D., Kakivaya, G., Layman, A., Mendelsohn,
N., Nielsen, H., Thatte, S. and D. Winer, "Simple Object Access
Protocol (SOAP) 1.1", May 2000, <http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/
NOTE-SOAP-20000508>.
[2] Rose, M., "The Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol Core", RFC
3080, March 2001.
[3] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Nielsen, H., Masinter, L.,
Leach, P. and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol --
HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999.
[4] Murata, M., St.Laurent, S. and D. Kohn, "XML Media Types", RFC
3023, January 2001.
[5] Levinson, E., "The MIME Multipart/Related Content-type", RFC
2387, August 1998.
[6] Barton, J., Thatte, S. and H. Nielsen, "SOAP Messages with
Attachments", December 2000, <http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-
SOAP-attachments-20001211>.
[7] Levinson, E., "Content-ID and Message-ID Uniform Resource
Locators", RFC 2392, August 1998.
[8] Palme, F., Hopmann, A., Shelness, N. and E. Stefferud, "MIME
Encapsulation of Aggregate Documents, such as HTML (MHTML)",
RFC 2557, March 1999.
[9] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies",
RFC 2045, November 1996.
[10] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and L. Masinter, "Uniform
Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC 2396, August
1998.
[11] Gulbrandsen, A., Vixie, P. and L. Esibov, "A DNS RR for
specifying the location of services (DNS SRV)", RFC 2782,
February 2000.
[12] Haskin, D. and E. Allen, "IP Version 6 over PPP", RFC 2472,
December 1998.
[13] Elkins, M., Del Torto, D., Levien, R. and T. Roessler, "MIME
Security with OpenPGP", RFC 3156, August 2001.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
[14] Ramsdell, B., "S/MIME Version 3 Message Specification", RFC
2633, June 1999.
IANA Considerations
The IANA has registered the profile specified in Section 7.1 as:
http://iana.org/beep/soap
The IANA has registered "soap.beep" and "soap.beeps" as URL schemes,
as specified in Section 7.2 and Section 7.3, respectively.
The IANA has also registered "SOAP over BEEP" as a TCP port number,
as specified in Section 7.4.
Finally, the IANA maintains a list of SOAP profile features, c.f.,
Section 6.1. The IESG is responsible for assigning a designated
expert to review the specification prior to the IANA making the
assignment. Prior to contacting the IESG, developers of SOAP profile
features must use the mailing list beepwg@lists.beepcore.org to
solicit commentary.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of: Christopher
Ferris, Huston Franklin, Alexey Melnikov, Bill Mills, and Roy T.
Fielding.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
Authors' Addresses
Eamon O'Tuathail
Clipcode.com
24 Thomastown Road
Dun Laoghaire
Dublin
IE
Phone: +353 1 2350 424
EMail: eamon.otuathail@clipcode.com
URI: http://www.clipcode.com/
Marshall T. Rose
Dover Beach Consulting, Inc.
POB 255268
Sacramento, CA 95865-5268
US
Phone: +1 916 483 8878
EMail: mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 3288 Using SOAP in BEEP June 2002
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
O'Tuathail & Rose Standards Track [Page 20]