Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Vendor Protocol
RFC 3772
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2012-08-22
|
02 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Thomas Narten |
|
2004-05-28
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza |
|
2004-05-28
|
02 | Amy Vezza | [Note]: 'RFC 3772 ' added by Amy Vezza |
|
2004-05-27
|
02 | (System) | RFC published |
|
2004-03-08
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
|
2004-03-08
|
02 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2004-03-08
|
02 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
|
2004-03-08
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2004-03-06
|
02 | Thomas Narten | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Thomas Narten |
|
2004-03-06
|
02 | Thomas Narten | [Note]: 'IESG: This document has a normative reference to RFC 2153, which is an informational document. The reference could easily be made non-normative. This … [Note]: 'IESG: This document has a normative reference to RFC 2153, which is an informational document. The reference could easily be made non-normative. This document could also be made informational instead. Thoughts on best approach solicited.' has been cleared by Thomas Narten |
|
2004-03-06
|
02 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Thomas Narten has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Thomas Narten |
|
2004-02-12
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pppext-vendor-protocol-02.txt |
|
2003-12-04
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-12-04 by Amy Vezza |
|
2003-12-04
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
|
2003-12-04
|
02 | Amy Vezza | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Amy Vezza |
|
2003-12-04
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Bert Wijnen |
|
2003-12-04
|
02 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Alex Zinin |
|
2003-12-04
|
02 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Bill Fenner |
|
2003-12-04
|
02 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Margaret Wasserman |
|
2003-12-04
|
02 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Jon Peterson |
|
2003-12-03
|
02 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot comment] I think this should go out as informational, to follow the tradition of 2153. I can't find a reference for the IANA considerations … [Ballot comment] I think this should go out as informational, to follow the tradition of 2153. I can't find a reference for the IANA considerations of PPP protocol numbers - are they FCFS? |
|
2003-12-03
|
02 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Harald Alvestrand |
|
2003-12-03
|
02 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Steve Bellovin |
|
2003-12-02
|
02 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Ted Hardie |
|
2003-12-02
|
02 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Russ Housley |
|
2003-11-29
|
02 | Ned Freed | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Ned Freed |
|
2003-11-26
|
02 | Thomas Narten | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Thomas Narten |
|
2003-11-26
|
02 | Thomas Narten | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2003-12-04 by Thomas Narten |
|
2003-11-26
|
02 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot discuss] Document has a normative reference to RFC 2153, which is informational. Need thought on best way to fix (put 2153 on standards … [Ballot discuss] Document has a normative reference to RFC 2153, which is informational. Need thought on best way to fix (put 2153 on standards track, make this informational, or make reference non-normative -- all seeme doable). |
|
2003-11-26
|
02 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Thomas Narten has been changed to Discuss from Yes by Thomas Narten |
|
2003-11-26
|
02 | Thomas Narten | [Note]: 'IESG: This document has a normative reference to RFC 2153, which is an informational document. The reference could easily be made non-normative. This … [Note]: 'IESG: This document has a normative reference to RFC 2153, which is an informational document. The reference could easily be made non-normative. This document could also be made informational instead. Thoughts on best approach solicited.' added by Thomas Narten |
|
2003-11-26
|
02 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Thomas Narten |
|
2003-11-26
|
02 | Thomas Narten | Ballot has been issued by Thomas Narten |
|
2003-11-26
|
02 | Thomas Narten | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2003-11-25
|
02 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system |
|
2003-11-04
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
|
2003-11-04
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
|
2003-11-04
|
02 | Thomas Narten | Last Call was requested by Thomas Narten |
|
2003-11-04
|
02 | Thomas Narten | State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Thomas Narten |
|
2003-11-04
|
02 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2003-11-04
|
02 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2003-11-04
|
02 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2003-11-04
|
02 | Dinara Suleymanova | Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova |
|
2003-10-15
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pppext-vendor-protocol-01.txt |
|
2003-07-24
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pppext-vendor-protocol-00.txt |