Operational Security Requirements for Large Internet Service Provider (ISP) IP Network Infrastructure
RFC 3871

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from gmj@pobox.com to (None)
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Bert Wijnen
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Allison Mankin
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Harald Alvestrand
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Ted Hardie
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for David Kessens
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Alex Zinin
2004-09-21
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2004-09-21
06 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 3871' added by Amy Vezza
2004-09-14
06 (System) RFC published
2004-04-26
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-04-26
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-04-26
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-04-26
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-04-26
06 Steven Bellovin State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Steve Bellovin
2004-04-26
06 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Bert Wijnen
2004-04-23
06 (System) New version available: draft-jones-opsec-06.txt
2004-04-19
05 (System) New version available: draft-jones-opsec-05.txt
2004-04-16
06 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-04-15
2004-04-15
06 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot discuss]
1.During the Seoul meeting an issue was reaised which has
  not been addressed yet, and my reviewer Dan Romascanu
  considers this ...
2004-04-15
06 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot comment]
------- Earlier concerns that have been cleared ----

From OPS Directorate

Overall: This document is not publishable in its current form.
While the ...
2004-04-15
06 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot discuss]
1.During the Seoul meeting an issue was reaised which has
  not been addressed yet, and my reviewer Dan Romascanu
  considers this ...
2004-04-15
06 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alex Zinin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Alex Zinin
2004-04-15
06 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Allison Mankin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Allison Mankin
2004-04-15
06 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bill Fenner has been changed to Yes from Abstain by Bill Fenner
2004-04-15
06 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot comment]
------- Earlier concerns that have been cleared ----

From OPS Directorate

Overall: This document is not publishable in its current form.
While the ...
2004-04-15
06 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot discuss]
1.During the Seoul meeting an issue was reaised which has
  not been addressed yet, and my reviewer Dan Romascanu
  considers this ...
2004-04-15
06 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot comment]
------- Earlier concerns that have been cleared ----

From OPS Directorate

Overall: This document is not publishable in its current form.
While the ...
2004-04-15
06 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot discuss]
1.During the Seoul meeting an issue was reaised which has
  not been addressed yet, and my reviewer Dan Romascanu
  considers this ...
2004-04-15
06 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot comment]
------- Earlier concerns that have been cleared ----

From OPS Directorate

Overall: This document is not publishable in its current form.
While the ...
2004-04-15
06 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot discuss]
1.During the Seoul meeting an issue was reaised which has
  not been addressed yet, and my reviewer Dan Romascanu
  considers this ...
2004-04-14
06 David Kessens [Ballot comment]
We got two positive comments from the ops directorate.
2004-04-14
06 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Kessens has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by David Kessens
2004-04-14
06 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Brian Carpenter, Gen-ART

NOTE (from Harald): I find it strange that the first "this is the author's opinion, not the IETF" ...
2004-04-14
06 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Brian Carpenter, Gen-ART
2004-04-14
06 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] Position for Harald Alvestrand has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Harald Alvestrand
2004-04-14
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Ted Hardie
2004-04-12
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2004-04-06
06 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-04-02
06 Steven Bellovin Intended Status has been changed to Informational from BCP
2004-04-02
06 Steven Bellovin Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-04-15 by Steve Bellovin
2004-04-02
06 Steven Bellovin [Note]: 'Revised version to meet the objections from last time; now targeted for Informational.' added by Steve Bellovin
2004-04-01
04 (System) New version available: draft-jones-opsec-04.txt
2004-02-05
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation - Defer by Amy Vezza
2004-02-05
06 Amy Vezza [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Amy Vezza
2004-02-05
06 Alex Zinin [Ballot discuss]
Comments received during the LC from the RTG area and RTG-DIR. Need to make sure they are addressed.
2004-02-05
06 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-02-05
06 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-02-05
06 Ned Freed [Ballot comment]
I see no point in belaboring the points others have already made.
2004-02-05
06 Ned Freed [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ned Freed by Ned Freed
2004-02-05
06 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot discuss]
I'm joining the club - this document can't possibly have had enough review.
This paragraph is just plain wrong:

  Spoofed Packet.

  ...
2004-02-05
06 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-02-04
06 David Kessens [Ballot discuss]
See comments from ops directorate
2004-02-04
06 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Kessens has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by David Kessens
2004-02-04
06 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-02-04
06 David Kessens

Received the following long list of comments from
Pekka on ops directorate (previous list was truncated):

substantial
-----------

2.1.1 Support Secure Channels For Management

  ...
2004-02-04
06 David Kessens State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation by David Kessens
2004-02-04
06 David Kessens State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation - Defer by David Kessens
2004-02-04
06 David Kessens
Received the following comments from ops directorate:

2.1.1 Support Secure Channels For Management

  Requirement. The device MUST provide mechanisms to ensure end-to-end
    ...
2004-01-25
06 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot discuss]
----------------
comments from OPS Directorate

Overall: This document is not publishable in its current form.
While the goal of the document (getting vendors ...
2004-01-22
06 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot discuss]
I got quite some feedback from OPS directorate and MIB Doctors.
I have some myself scribbled on a printed version.
I need to ...
2004-01-22
06 Bill Fenner State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation by Bill Fenner
2004-01-22
06 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot discuss]
I got quite some feedback from OPS directorate and MIB Doctors.
I have some myself scribbled on a printed version.
I need to ...
2004-01-22
06 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-01-22
06 Ted Hardie
[Ballot discuss]
I don't support this going for BCP.  There are a number of cases in the document where
there are value judgements about the ...
2004-01-22
06 Allison Mankin
[Ballot comment]
These aren't blocking comments, but a few bits.  The TCP term should
be fixed with an RFC Editor Note.

1.3
- SOHO is ...
2004-01-22
06 Allison Mankin
[Ballot comment]
These aren't blocking comments, but a few bits.  The TCP term should
be fixed with an RFC Editor Note.

1.3
- SOHO is ...
2004-01-22
06 Allison Mankin
[Ballot discuss]
The introductory  material needs to mention that the BCP requirement on devices
is modified vis-a-vis some devices by Appendix A - edge devices ...
2004-01-22
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-01-22
06 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Allison Mankin has been changed to Discuss from Undefined by Allison Mankin
2004-01-22
06 Allison Mankin
[Ballot comment]
These aren't blocking comments, but if the document is getting a rev, some fixes:

1.3
- SOHO is unexpanded (in "SOHO devices").

1.4 ...
2004-01-22
06 Russ Housley [Ballot discuss]
The security considerations ought to say how following the practices in this
  document will improve security of the Internet.
2004-01-22
06 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Delete last sentence in Abstract.

  Replace 'insure' with 'ensure' throughtout the document.

  The document uses [PKCS.3.1993] as a reference for Diffie-Hellman.  ...
2004-01-22
06 Russ Housley [Ballot discuss]
The security considerations ought to say how following the practices in this
  document will improve security of the Internet.
2004-01-22
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-01-22
06 Allison Mankin
[Ballot comment]
- SOHO is unexpanded (in "SOHO devices").

"traffic goes where its supposed to go (availability, confidentiality)"  - why is this about
  confidentiality?  ...
2004-01-22
06 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2004-01-21
06 Margaret Cullen
[Ballot comment]
I have entered a no-obj position, because I have no technical issues with this
document.  However, given the feedback we received about the ...
2004-01-21
06 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-01-21
06 Allison Mankin
[Ballot comment]
- SOHO is unexpanded (in "SOHO devices").

"traffic goes where its supposed to go (availability, confidentiality)"  - why is this about
  confidentiality?  ...
2004-01-21
06 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2004-01-20
06 Steven Bellovin State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Steve Bellovin
2004-01-15
06 Steven Bellovin Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-01-22 by Steve Bellovin
2004-01-15
06 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Steven Bellovin
2004-01-15
06 Steven Bellovin Ballot has been issued by Steve Bellovin
2004-01-15
06 Steven Bellovin Created "Approve" ballot
2004-01-15
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-01-15
06 (System) Last call text was added
2004-01-15
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-01-14
06 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2003-12-17
06 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2003-12-17
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2003-12-16
06 Steven Bellovin State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Steve Bellovin
2003-12-16
06 Steven Bellovin State Change Notice email list have been change to gmj@pobox.com from
2003-12-16
06 Steven Bellovin Draft Added by Steve Bellovin
2003-12-16
03 (System) New version available: draft-jones-opsec-03.txt
2003-10-27
02 (System) New version available: draft-jones-opsec-02.txt
2003-08-20
01 (System) New version available: draft-jones-opsec-01.txt
2003-06-09
00 (System) New version available: draft-jones-opsec-00.txt