SEcure Neighbor Discovery (SEND)
RFC 3971

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from Pekka.Nikander@nomadiclab.com, kempf@docomolabs-usa.com to (None)
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Thomas Narten
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Steven Bellovin
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ted Hardie
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2005-03-24
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2005-03-24
06 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 3971' added by Amy Vezza
2005-03-15
06 (System) RFC published
2004-08-11
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-08-10
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-08-10
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-08-10
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-08-10
06 Margaret Cullen State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Margaret Wasserman
2004-08-10
06 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] Position for Thomas Narten has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Thomas Narten
2004-08-09
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2004-08-08
06 Margaret Cullen Sent reminder to Thomas and Russ.  Latest version should address all discuss comments.
2004-07-23
06 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Steve Bellovin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Steve Bellovin
2004-07-19
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2004-07-19
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-send-ndopt-06.txt
2004-06-14
06 Ted Hardie
[Ballot comment]
Removed DISCUSS as Steve's was a superset of the issues I raised.  To
make coordination a bit easier, he will hold ...
2004-06-14
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ted Hardie
2004-06-11
06 Thomas Narten
[Ballot comment]
Editorial (more or less):

>      4.  The 32-bit ICMP header.

Would be better to make clear exactly what part of ...
2004-06-11
06 Thomas Narten
[Ballot discuss]
> 5.1.1 Processing Rules for Senders
>
>
>    The CGA option MUST be present in all Neighbor Solicitation and ...
2004-06-11
06 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] Position for Thomas Narten has been changed to Discuss from Undefined by Thomas Narten
2004-06-11
06 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-06-11
06 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-06-10
2004-06-10
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-06-10
06 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot discuss]
I'm very concerned that the authorization model used by the authors is incorrect.  Several of the following comments, including the most ...
2004-06-10
06 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-06-10
06 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2004-06-10
06 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2004-06-10
06 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
RFC 3280 uses the term "certification path," not the term "certificate
  chain." Likewise, RFC 3280 uses the term "certification authority," not
  ...
2004-06-10
06 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The protocol supports a single digital signature algorithm.  Since
  no algorithm identifiers appear in any of the protocol data units,
  ...
2004-06-10
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-06-10
06 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-06-10
06 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-06-10
06 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Michael Patton, Gen-ART.

I believe this needs a respin for other reasons. But the number of language issues identified in Patton ...
2004-06-10
06 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-06-10
06 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2004-06-09
06 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot comment]
Given that there are implementations of this spec, it would be nice to include an appendix giving typical packet lengths, especially for messages ...
2004-06-09
06 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot discuss]
I'm very concerned that the authorization model used by the authors is incorrect.  Several of the following comments, including the most ...
2004-06-09
06 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-06-08
06 Ted Hardie
[Ballot discuss]
I guess I have a fundamental design question.  The draft describes part of the
underlying logic in section 6.1 as:

  ...
2004-06-08
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-05-24
06 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-05-22
06 Margaret Cullen State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Margaret Wasserman
2004-05-22
06 Margaret Cullen Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-06-10 by Margaret Wasserman
2004-05-22
06 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman
2004-05-22
06 Margaret Cullen Ballot has been issued by Margaret Wasserman
2004-05-22
06 Margaret Cullen Created "Approve" ballot
2004-05-22
06 Margaret Cullen Note field has been cleared by Margaret Wasserman
2004-05-17
06 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2004-05-10
06 Michelle Cotton
IANA Last Call Comments:
We understand the IANA Actions to be the following:

ICMPv6 type numbers for:

Delegation Chain Solicitation message
Delegation Chain Advertisement message ...
2004-05-03
06 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2004-05-03
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2004-05-02
06 Margaret Cullen
Document submission questionnaire from James Kempf:

1) Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the ID and do
  they believe this ID is ...
2004-05-02
06 Margaret Cullen State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Margaret Wasserman
2004-05-02
06 Margaret Cullen Last Call was requested by Margaret Wasserman
2004-05-02
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-05-02
06 (System) Last call text was added
2004-05-02
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-05-02
06 Margaret Cullen State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Margaret Wasserman
2004-05-02
06 Margaret Cullen [Note]: 'Requested expert review from Security ADs and Eric Rescorla.' added by Margaret Wasserman
2004-04-27
06 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova
2004-04-16
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-send-ndopt-05.txt
2004-02-17
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-send-ndopt-04.txt
2004-01-28
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-send-ndopt-03.txt
2004-01-20
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-send-ndopt-01.txt
2003-10-17
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-send-ndopt-00.txt