Skip to main content

A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Federated Content
RFC 4198

Document Type RFC - Informational (November 2005)
Was draft-dtessman-urn-namespace-federated-content (individual in app area)
Author Dave Tessman
Last updated 2015-10-14
RFC stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
IESG Responsible AD Ted Hardie
Send notices to (None)
RFC 4198
Network Working Group                                         D. Tessman
Request for Comments: 4198                                      Zelestra
Category: Informational                                    November 2005

     A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Federated Content

Status of This Memo

   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
   not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
   memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).


   This document describes a URN (Uniform Resource Name) namespace for
   identifying content resources within federated content collections.
   A federated content collection often does not have a strong
   centralized authority but relies upon shared naming, metadata, and
   access conventions to provide interoperability among its members.

1.  Introduction

   Federated content collections are often loose constructs of both
   small and large content providers, with an active community, but
   without significant central authority.  Members are bound together by
   shared purpose and interoperate through shared naming, metadata, and
   access conventions.  Federations may also consist of other
   federations, creating complex associations and dependencies.

   A content provider may join or leave a federation at any time and may
   be part of more than one federation at the same time.  Content
   providers may also cease as organizations altogether, freeing their
   domain names for use by others.  In addition, content identifiers are
   spread throughout the members of a federation.  These identifiers are
   stored on various media, sometimes for long durations before being
   used.  Therefore, although they work well in situations without a
   strong content naming authority, URLs are insufficient as content
   identifiers within a federation because they cannot be uniquely and
   permanently tied to a specific content resource.

Tessman                      Informational                      [Page 1]
RFC 4198          URN Namespace for Federated Content      November 2005

   This URN namespace provides a mechanism whereby a central naming
   authority is not required.  Providers maintain naming authority over
   their own content within guidelines that guarantee URNs to be unique
   and permanent.

   A simple identifier resolution convention is also recommended to
   provide a consistent URN resolver interface across all providers.

   This namespace specification is for a formal namespace.

2.  Terminology

   In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED",
   and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [1].

3.  Specification Template

   Namespace ID:


   Registration Information:

      Registration Version Number: 1
      Registration Date: 2005-04-25

   Declared registrant of the namespace:

      Name:       Zelestra
      Address:    2314 Henrietta Avenue
                  La Crescenta, CA 91214-3007

      Contact:    Dave Tessman

   Declaration of syntactic structure:

      The NSS has the following ABNF [2] specification:

      NSS         = ProviderId ":" DateId ":" ResourceId
      ProviderId  = 1*(label ".") toplabel
      DateId      = (CCYY [MM [DD]]) / 1*3(DIGIT)
      ResourceId  = 1*(alphanum / other / ("%" hex hex))
      label       = alphanum / alphanum *(alphanum / "-") alphanum
      toplabel    = ALPHA / ALPHA *(alphanum / "-") alphanum
      CCYY        = 4(DIGIT)

Tessman                      Informational                      [Page 2]
RFC 4198          URN Namespace for Federated Content      November 2005

      MM          = ("0" %x31-39) / ("1" %x30-32)
      DD          = ("0" %x31-39) / (%x31-32 DIGIT) / "30" / "31"
      alphanum    = ALPHA / DIGIT
      hex         = DIGIT / %x41-46 / %x61-66
      other       = "(" / ")" / "+" / "," / "-" / "." / ":" / "=" /
                    "@" / ";" / "$" / "_" / "!" / "*" / "'"

      ProviderId is the content provider's identifier.  ProviderId MUST
      be an Internet domain name and MUST be owned by the organization
      creating the resource and allocating the URN to the resource.

      DateId is a date in ISO 8601 Basic Format (CCYY[MM[DD]]), and MUST
      correspond to a specific day on which the organization allocating
      the URN owned the domain name specified in the ProviderId.  If not
      included, the default value for MM and DD is "01".  DateIds of 1
      to 3 digits are reserved.

      ResourceId MUST be unique among all ResourceIds emanating from the
      same provider and having the same DateId.

   Relevant ancillary documentation:


   Identifier uniqueness considerations:

      The combination of ProviderId and DateId serves to uniquely
      identify the organization that is allocating the URN.  That
      organization is responsible for ensuring the uniqueness of the

   Identifier persistence considerations:

      A URN of this namespace may only be allocated by an organization
      that owns an Internet domain name.  The URN identifies a date on
      which the organization owned that domain name.  The combination of
      domain name and date will serve to uniquely identify that
      organization for all time.

   Process of identifier assignment:

     The organization identified by the ProviderId/DateId combination is
     responsible for allocating a ResourceId that is unique among all
     those that it allocates with that DateId.

Tessman                      Informational                      [Page 3]
RFC 4198          URN Namespace for Federated Content      November 2005

   Process of identifier resolution:

     Content providers are responsible for the provision of a URN
     resolution service, if any, for URNs they have assigned with a
     valid ProviderId/DateId combination.

     Content providers SHOULD support URN resolution by using the HTTP
     protocol convention described in RFC 2169 [3].  The ProviderId
     SHOULD be used as the HTTP server location.

   Rules for Lexical Equivalence:

      In addition to the rules defined in RFC 2141 [4], normalize the
      case of the ProviderId to lower case before comparison.

   Conformance with URN Syntax:

      There are no additional characters reserved.

   Validation mechanism:

      None additional to resolution specified.



4.  Examples

   The following examples are representative of URNs in this namespace,
   but may not refer to actual resources.

5.  Security Considerations

   There are no additional security considerations other than those
   normally associated with the use and resolution of URNs in general.

6.  Namespace Considerations

   Distribution of naming authority, identifier flexibility, and a
   recommended URN resolution mechanism make this namespace a unique and
   valuable tool to meet the URN requirements of small content providers
   and federated content collections.

Tessman                      Informational                      [Page 4]
RFC 4198          URN Namespace for Federated Content      November 2005

7.  Community Considerations

   By establishing a simple, flexible, and efficient means for smaller
   content providers to uniquely identify and publish their content,
   this namespace reduces the effort required for these providers to
   participate in federated collections.  A consistent identifier format
   and resolution mechanism also increases the ability of federations to
   accept content references from smaller providers and to aggregate
   themselves into federations of federations.  Increased participation
   and aggregation results in a larger selection of distinctive content
   that is more accessible to the community.

   To make use of this namespace, a content provider should further
   decompose the ResourceId portion of the namespace syntactic structure
   to meet their internal content identification needs and establish an
   internal governance mechanism to ensure that all identifiers created
   follow the requirements of this namespace.  It is also recommended
   that the identifier resolution mechanism described in RFC 2169 [3] be
   provisioned within an HTTP server designated by the ProviderId
   portion of the namespace syntactic structure.

8.  IANA Considerations

   This document includes a URN NID registration that conforms to RFC
   3406 [5] and has been entered into the IANA registry of URN NIDs.

Normative References

   [1]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
        Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [2]  Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
        Specifications: ABNF", RFC 4234, October 2005.

   [3]  Daniel, R., "A Trivial Convention for using HTTP in URN
        Resolution", RFC 2169, June 1997.

   [4]  Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997.

Informative References

   [5]  Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom,
        "Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespace Definition Mechanisms",
        BCP 66, RFC 3406, October 2002.

Tessman                      Informational                      [Page 5]
RFC 4198          URN Namespace for Federated Content      November 2005

Author's Address

   Dave Tessman
   2314 Henrietta Avenue
   La Crescenta, California 91214-3007

   Phone: +1 818 249 8906

Tessman                      Informational                      [Page 6]
RFC 4198          URN Namespace for Federated Content      November 2005

Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an

Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-


   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.

Tessman                      Informational                      [Page 7]