Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol
RFC 4301

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from byfraser@cisco.com, tytso@mit.edu to (None)
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sam Hartman
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Russ Housley
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Abstain position for Alex Zinin
2005-12-27
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2005-12-27
06 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4301' added by Amy Vezza
2005-12-22
06 (System) RFC published
2005-04-14
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2005-04-13
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2005-04-13
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2005-04-13
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2005-04-12
06 Russ Housley State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Russ Housley
2005-04-11
06 (System) [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alex Zinin has been changed to Abstain from Discuss
2005-04-11
06 Alex Zinin
[Ballot comment]
The document attempts to cover certain VPN-related issues, but the routing-
related part is not adequate. It would take a lot of time ...
2005-04-05
06 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sam Hartman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Sam Hartman
2005-04-01
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Russ Housley
2005-04-01
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2005-04-01
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2401bis-06.txt
2005-02-08
06 Sam Hartman
To: kent@bbn.com, kseo@bbn.com
Cc: housley@vigilsec.com, hartmans-ietf@MIT.EDU
Subject: Explaining my RFC 2401bis concerns
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 15:45:24 -0500
Message-ID: <tsl6512pyqj.fsf@cz.mit.edu> ...
2005-01-07
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2005-01-07
06 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-01-06
2005-01-06
06 Sam Hartman
[Ballot comment]
Section 6.1.2 creates requirements for incoming ICMP packets on the
protected side of the IPsec boundary.  As best I can tell the attacks ...
2005-01-06
06 Sam Hartman
[Ballot discuss]
I'm updating this discuss based on discussions with Steve Kent and on
the IESG telechat.  My words have changed significantly but the issues ...
2005-01-06
06 Amy Vezza [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Amy Vezza
2005-01-06
06 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2005-01-06
06 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2005-01-06
06 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2005-01-06
06 Harald Alvestrand
Review from Brian Carpenter, Gen-ART

I think this is basically ready to go, but I have a few minor comments
and there are some nits. ...
2005-01-06
06 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Brian Carpenter, Gen-ART

There are nits and small comments (review in document log), but no show-stoppers.
2005-01-06
06 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2005-01-06
06 Alex Zinin
[Ballot discuss]
How does the in/out-bound processing model defined in section 5 work in the case
of a VPN gateway? In particular, how does presence ...
2005-01-06
06 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2005-01-05
06 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2005-01-05
06 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2005-01-05
06 Michelle Cotton IANA Comments: We understand this document to have NO IANA Actions.
2005-01-05
06 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2005-01-04
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Ted Hardie
2005-01-04
06 Ted Hardie
[Ballot comment]
This seems to have a mix of RFC 2026 and RFC 3668 boilerplates.

In Section 4.1, the draft says:

In many secure multicast ...
2005-01-04
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2005-01-04
06 Sam Hartman
[Ballot discuss]
A lot of good work has gone into this document.  I find it easier to
follow than RFC 2401 and believe it would ...
2005-01-04
06 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman
2004-12-23
06 Russ Housley State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Russ Housley
2004-12-22
06 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2004-12-22
06 Russ Housley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-01-06 by Russ Housley
2004-12-13
06 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-12-08
06 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2004-12-08
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2004-12-08
06 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Section 4.1:
  s/Memory (TCAM0 features/Memory (TCAM) features/

  Section 4.4.1:
  s/SPD-SPD-S, SPD-SPD-I, SPD-SPD-O/SPD-S, SPD-I, SPD-O/
  s/The SPD-SPD-S/The SPD-S/

  Section ...
2004-12-08
06 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
When will the module identifier be assigned for Appendix C?
  If you want IANA to do it, then it needs to be ...
2004-12-08
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to Discuss from Yes by Russ Housley
2004-12-08
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2004-12-08
06 Russ Housley Ballot has been issued by Russ Housley
2004-12-08
06 Russ Housley Created "Approve" ballot
2004-12-08
06 Russ Housley Last Call was requested by Russ Housley
2004-12-08
06 Russ Housley State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Russ Housley
2004-12-08
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-12-08
06 (System) Last call text was added
2004-12-08
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-12-08
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2004-12-08
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2401bis-05.txt
2004-11-30
06 Russ Housley State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Russ Housley
2004-11-30
06 Russ Housley Comments were provided to the authors.  A revised draft should be available in a few days.
2004-11-07
06 Russ Housley State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Russ Housley
2004-11-07
06 Russ Housley Draft Added by Russ Housley in state Publication Requested
2004-10-26
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2401bis-04.txt
2004-09-21
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2401bis-03.txt
2004-01-14
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2401bis-01.txt
2004-01-07
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2401bis-02.txt
2003-10-23
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2401bis-00.txt