IP Authentication Header
RFC 4302

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Bert Wijnen
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Jon Peterson
2005-12-27
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2005-12-27
11 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4302' added by Amy Vezza
2005-12-22
11 (System) RFC published
2005-03-21
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-11.txt
2005-01-12
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2005-01-10
11 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2005-01-10
11 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2005-01-10
11 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2005-01-07
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2005-01-07
11 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-01-06
2005-01-06
11 (System) [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie
2005-01-06
11 (System) [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin
2005-01-06
11 Sam Hartman
[Ballot comment]
The security considerations section is weak.  Ideally it would be
better.  However I cannot think of things that need to be added that ...
2005-01-06
11 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman
2005-01-06
11 Harald Alvestrand
Review by Elwyn Davies, Gen-ART

Summary: This document is essentially ready for recycling at Proposed
Standard.  There are a small number of nits that need ...
2005-01-06
11 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Elwyn Davies, Gen-ART

Review in document comments; they seem as if they would have made the document better if addressed, but ...
2005-01-05
11 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2005-01-05
11 Michelle Cotton IANA Comments:
We understand this document to have NO IANA Actions.
2005-01-03
11 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jon Peterson has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Jon Peterson
2005-01-03
11 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-12-22
11 Russ Housley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-01-06 by Russ Housley
2004-12-22
11 Russ Housley State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation::Point Raised - writeup needed by Russ Housley
2004-12-08
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-10.txt
2004-10-27
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-09.txt
2004-10-06
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-08.txt
2004-03-24
11 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Bert Wijnen
2004-03-02
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-07.txt
2004-02-16
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-06.txt
2003-10-02
11 Amy Vezza [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Amy Vezza
2003-10-02
11 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-10-02 by Amy Vezza
2003-10-02
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2003-10-02
11 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2003-10-02
11 Margaret Cullen
[Ballot comment]
There is a normative reference to the IPv6 specification (presumably
because this document references the IPv6 header fields), but there
is no normative ...
2003-10-02
11 Jon Peterson [Ballot discuss]
See my Comment - since the "algorithms" document is not currently available, we should block this document until algorithms becomes available.
2003-10-02
11 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] Position has been changed to Discuss from Yes by Jon Peterson
2003-10-02
11 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] Position has been changed to Yes from No Objection by Jon Peterson
2003-10-02
11 Ned Freed [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ned Freed
2003-10-02
11 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Thomas Narten
2003-10-02
11 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Allison Mankin
2003-10-02
11 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Margaret Wasserman
2003-10-02
11 Randy Bush [Ballot Position Update] Position has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Randy Bush
2003-10-02
11 Randy Bush [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded by Randy Bush
2003-10-02
11 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Bill Fenner
2003-10-02
11 Amy Vezza [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Amy Vezza
2003-10-02
11 Steven Bellovin [Ballot discuss]
Section 6 can't be evaluated until 2401bis shows up.
2003-10-02
11 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot discuss]
- Is this a doc going to OBSOLETE 2402? If so, then I believe
  we want the abstract to say so (so ...
2003-10-02
11 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position has been changed to Discuss from Undefined by Bert Wijnen
2003-10-02
11 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded by Bert Wijnen
2003-10-02
11 Amy Vezza [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Amy Vezza
2003-10-02
11 Jon Peterson
[Ballot comment]
If mandatory-to-implement algorithms have been moved out of 2402bis into a
separate RFC (per Section 7 and the 2nd paragraph of Section 5), ...
2003-10-02
11 Amy Vezza [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Amy Vezza
2003-10-02
11 Amy Vezza [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Amy Vezza
2003-10-02
11 Amy Vezza Ballot has been issued by Amy Vezza
2003-10-02
11 Amy Vezza Created "Approve" ballot
2003-10-02
11 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2003-10-02
11 (System) Last call text was added
2003-10-02
11 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2003-09-26
11 Russ Housley State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Russ Housley
2003-09-26
11 Russ Housley Status date has been changed to 2003-09-26 from 2003-08-04
2003-09-26
11 Russ Housley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2003-10-02 by Russ Housley
2003-09-25
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-05.txt
2003-09-22
11 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2003-09-08
11 Michael Lee Last call sent
2003-09-08
11 Michael Lee State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Michael Lee
2003-08-18
11 Russ Housley State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Russ Housley
2003-08-04
11 Russ Housley State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Russ Housley
2003-08-04
11 Russ Housley Draft Added by Russ Housley
2003-07-25
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-04.txt
2003-04-08
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-03.txt
2003-03-05
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-02.txt
2002-07-02
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-01.txt
2002-03-05
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-00.txt