[Ballot discuss]
In draft-ietf-lemonade-urlauth-07, Status of this Memo, the document
  says:
  >
  > A revised version of this document will be submitted to the RFC
  > editor as an Informational Document for the Internet Community.
  >
  This document is being recommended for standards-track.  Do the
  authors have other expectations?

  In draft-ietf-lemonade-urlauth-07, section 2, the definition of
  "access identifiers" is unclear.  In my COMMENT, I have suggested a
  clarification based on my reading of the document.  I could easily
  have gotten something wrong, and I will accept any rewording that
  makes the meaning clear.

  In draft-ietf-lemonade-urlauth-07, section 2, the document says:
  >
  > The "submit+" access identifier, followed by a userid, indicates ...
  >
  and
  >
  > The "user+" access identifier, followed by a userid, indicates ...
  >
  Neither "submit+" and "user+" are authorized access identifiers, as
  they are not a complete <access> portion of the URLAUTH.  Perhaps
  these should be called authorized access identifiers prefixes.

IANA Last Call Comments:
Upon approval of this document the IANA will register the "BURL" SMTP extension in the SMTP Service Extensions registry found at the following:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/mail-parameters

In the IANA Considerations section there is the following statement:
"This registration will be marked for use by message submission [11] only in the registry."

We are not clear how this should be marked in the registry.