Quality of Service (QoS) Signaling in a Nested Virtual Private Network
RFC 4923

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
02 (System) Notify list changed from tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org, fred@cisco.com,pratik.bose@lmco.com to (None)
2012-08-22
02 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
02 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sam Hartman
2012-08-22
02 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Mark Townsley
2007-08-17
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2007-08-17
02 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4923' added by Amy Vezza
2007-08-15
02 (System) RFC published
2007-04-04
02 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2007-04-04
02 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2007-04-02
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2007-03-28
02 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2007-03-28
02 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2007-03-28
02 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2007-03-28
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza
2007-03-19
02 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Mark Townsley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Mark Townsley
2007-02-06
02 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2007-02-06
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tsvwg-vpn-signaled-preemption-02.txt
2007-02-01
02 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
My Discuss was resolved through text that Patrik Bose
sent in an e-mail on Jan 24, 2007. I expect the text
to appear ...
2007-02-01
02 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Jari Arkko
2006-11-08
02 (System) Request for Early review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Tom Yu.
2006-10-13
02 Magnus Westerlund State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Magnus Westerlund
2006-10-12
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2006-10-12
02 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2006-10-12
02 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Bill Fenner
2006-10-11
02 Sam Hartman [Ballot comment]
Mark's discuss completely covers mine so I have removed it.
2006-10-11
02 Sam Hartman [Ballot comment]
Mark's discuss completely overlaps mine so I have removed it.
2006-10-11
02 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sam Hartman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Sam Hartman
2006-10-11
02 Mark Townsley
[Ballot discuss]
I received the following from L3VPN Chair, Ron Bonica. I think that the separation of "nested" networks Ron points to is important. What ...
2006-10-11
02 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Mark Townsley
2006-10-11
02 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2006-10-11
02 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot comment]
It might be worth mentioning in the security section about how this leaks information about priorities levels and the cases where it would ...
2006-10-11
02 Sam Hartman
[Ballot discuss]
This document requires that a security association contain traffic of
only one priority/precedence (I've lost track of what term means what ...
2006-10-11
02 (System) State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation - Defer by system
2006-10-09
02 Brian Carpenter
[Ballot comment]
I'd be pleased to see an update responding to the points raised
in the Gen-ART review by Sharon Chisholm:
http://www1.ietf ...
2006-10-09
02 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Brian Carpenter
2006-09-29
02 Sam Hartman
[Ballot discuss]
Hi.  I believe it is inappropriate to consider this document before
draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-ipsec comes to the IESG.  As I understand it,
the ...
2006-09-29
02 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sam Hartman has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Sam Hartman
2006-09-29
02 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2006-09-28
2006-09-28
02 Mark Townsley State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation by Mark Townsley
2006-09-27
02 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Kessens
2006-09-27
02 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sam Hartman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Sam Hartman
2006-09-27
02 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Sam Hartman
2006-09-27
02 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
> This means that the
> Guard must somehow receive and respond to, on behalf of the VPN
> Router, messages that are ...
2006-09-27
02 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2006-09-27
02 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2006-09-27
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tsvwg-vpn-signaled-preemption-01.txt
2006-09-27
02 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2006-09-26
02 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Section 1., paragraph 10:
>    interface; a priority scheduler always chooses a datagram from the
>    highest priority class (queue) that ...
2006-09-26
02 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2006-09-25
02 Magnus Westerlund State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Magnus Westerlund
2006-09-25
02 Magnus Westerlund Placed on agenda for telechat - 2006-09-28 by Magnus Westerlund
2006-09-25
02 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Magnus Westerlund
2006-09-25
02 Magnus Westerlund Ballot has been issued by Magnus Westerlund
2006-09-25
02 Magnus Westerlund Created "Approve" ballot
2006-09-21
02 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2006-09-15
02 Yoshiko Fong IANA Last Call Comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand
this document to have no IANA Actions.
2006-09-07
02 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2006-09-07
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2006-09-07
02 Magnus Westerlund State Change Notice email list have been change to tsvwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org, fred@cisco.com,pratik.bose@lmco.com from tsvwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org
2006-09-07
02 Magnus Westerlund State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Magnus Westerlund
2006-09-07
02 Magnus Westerlund Last Call was requested by Magnus Westerlund
2006-09-07
02 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2006-09-07
02 (System) Last call text was added
2006-09-07
02 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2006-07-21
02 Lars Eggert Magnus is AD for this one.
2006-07-21
02 Lars Eggert Shepherding AD has been changed to Magnus Westerlund from Lars Eggert
2006-07-21
02 Dinara Suleymanova
PROTO Write-up

1.a) Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the Internet
Draft (ID), and in particular, do they believe this ID is ...
2006-07-21
02 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested
2006-02-28
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tsvwg-vpn-signaled-preemption-00.txt