Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA): Overview and Requirements
RFC 5209

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2017-05-16
07 (System) Changed document authors from "Paul Sangster" to "Paul Sangster, Hormuzd Khosravi, Kaushik Narayan, Joseph Tardo, Mahalingam Mani"
2015-10-14
07 (System) Notify list changed from nea-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-nea-requirements@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Cullen Jennings
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Magnus Westerlund
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Record position for Ronald Bonica
2008-06-30
07 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2008-06-30
07 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'RFC 5209' added by Cindy Morgan
2008-06-26
07 (System) RFC published
2008-05-22
07 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2008-05-21
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2008-05-21
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2008-05-21
07 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2008-05-21
07 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2008-05-21
07 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2008-05-21
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza
2008-05-20
07 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert
2008-04-21
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Jari Arkko
2008-04-18
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-nea-requirements-07.txt
2008-03-19
07 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Cullen Jennings
2008-02-28
07 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] Position for Magnus Westerlund has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Magnus Westerlund
2008-02-25
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2008-02-25
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-nea-requirements-06.txt
2008-01-11
07 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2008-01-10
2008-01-10
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Phillip Hallam-Baker.
2008-01-10
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2008-01-10
07 David Ward [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Ward
2008-01-10
07 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2008-01-10
07 Magnus Westerlund
[Ballot discuss]
General issue and a discuss discuss.

I think the initial architecture is lacking two entities in its discussion. The initiator, i.e. the ...
2008-01-10
07 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Sam Hartman
2008-01-10
07 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2008-01-10
07 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
Comment based on input from OPS-DIR member Kurt Eril Lindqvist:

NEA was brought to the IETF partly by 'real' network managers who said ...
2008-01-10
07 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2008-01-10
07 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ron Bonica has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Ron Bonica
2008-01-10
07 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
The draft permits an assignment to be documented in an Internet Draft
or in a RFC.  It seems to be a bad ...
2008-01-10
07 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
The draft permits an assignment to be documented in an Internet Draft
or in a RFC.  It seems to be a bad ...
2008-01-10
07 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2008-01-10
07 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley
2008-01-10
07 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I am concerned that some of the requirements on PT protocols
may not be practical. For instance, EAP is not a good transport ...
2008-01-10
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2008-01-10
07 Chris Newman
[Ballot comment]
This requirements effort is clearly excessive due to the length and
complexity of this document.  It's certainly time to start real ...
2008-01-10
07 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Chris Newman
2008-01-10
07 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
Reading section 8.3.1 ... I would like the document to be slightly more explicit about what the requirements are around MITM. Is ...
2008-01-10
07 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2008-01-08
07 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Comments are from Scott Brim's Gen-ART Review.

  Abstract

  - "evaluate the posture of a system"

    For clarity please use ...
2008-01-08
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2008-01-08
07 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Section 7., paragraph 0:
>  7. Requirements (Only Normative Section)

  This is an Informational document and hence cannot have any normative
  ...
2008-01-08
07 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
Section 5., paragraph 0:
>  5. Reference Model

  DISCUSS: I'm missing a paragraph that discusses how NEA intersect with
  multihoming ...
2008-01-08
07 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2007-12-29
07 Tim Polk Placed on agenda for telechat - 2008-01-10 by Tim Polk
2007-12-27
07 Tim Polk State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Tim Polk
2007-12-27
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Tim Polk
2007-12-27
07 Tim Polk Ballot has been issued by Tim Polk
2007-12-27
07 Tim Polk Created "Approve" ballot
2007-12-24
07 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2007-12-18
07 Amanda Baber IANA Last Call comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document
to have NO IANA Actions.
2007-12-11
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Phillip Hallam-Baker
2007-12-11
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Phillip Hallam-Baker
2007-12-10
07 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2007-12-10
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2007-12-07
07 Tim Polk Last Call was requested by Tim Polk
2007-12-07
07 Tim Polk State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Tim Polk
2007-12-07
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2007-12-07
07 (System) Last call text was added
2007-12-07
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2007-12-07
07 Tim Polk Steve Hanna is the document shepherd.
2007-12-07
07 Tim Polk Draft Added by Tim Polk in state Publication Requested
2007-11-01
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-nea-requirements-05.txt
2007-08-28
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-nea-requirements-04.txt
2007-07-11
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-nea-requirements-03.txt
2007-05-01
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-nea-requirements-02.txt
2007-03-05
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-nea-requirements-01.txt
2007-01-10
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-nea-requirements-00.txt