Internet Message Access Protocol - ANNOTATE Extension
RFC 5257
| Document | Type | RFC - Experimental (June 2008; Errata) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Cyrus Daboo , Randall Gellens | ||
| Last updated | 2018-12-20 | ||
| Stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | plain text html pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex | ||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||
| IESG | IESG state | RFC 5257 (Experimental) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | Lisa Dusseault | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
Network Working Group C. Daboo
Request for Comments: 5257 Apple Inc.
Category: Experimental R. Gellens
QUALCOMM Incorporated
June 2008
Internet Message Access Protocol - ANNOTATE Extension
Status of This Memo
This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
The ANNOTATE extension to the Internet Message Access Protocol
permits clients and servers to maintain "meta data" for messages, or
individual message parts, stored in a mailbox on the server. For
example, this can be used to attach comments and other useful
information to a message. It is also possible to attach annotations
to specific parts of a message, so that, for example, they could be
marked as seen, or important, or a comment added.
Note that this document was the product of a WG that had good
consensus on how to approach the problem. Nevertheless, the WG felt
it did not have enough information on implementation and deployment
hurdles to meet all of the requirements of a Proposed Standard. The
IETF solicits implementations and implementation reports in order to
make further progress.
Implementers should be aware that this specification may change in an
incompatible manner when going to Proposed Standard status. However,
any incompatible changes will result in a new capability name being
used to prevent problems with any deployments of the experimental
extension.
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 1]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
Table of Contents
1. Introduction and Overview .......................................3
2. Conventions Used in This Document ...............................4
3. Data Model ......................................................4
3.1. Overview ...................................................4
3.2. Namespace of Entries and Attributes ........................4
3.2.1. Entry Names .........................................5
3.2.2. Attribute Names .....................................7
3.3. Private Versus Shared ......................................7
3.4. Access Control .............................................8
3.5. Access to Standard IMAP Flags and Keywords ................11
4. IMAP Protocol Changes ..........................................11
4.1. General Considerations ....................................11
4.2. ANNOTATE Parameter with the SELECT/EXAMINE Commands .......12
4.3. ANNOTATION Message Data Item in FETCH Command .............12
4.4. ANNOTATION Message Data Item in FETCH Response ............14
4.5. ANNOTATION Message Data Item in STORE .....................16
4.6. ANNOTATION Interaction with COPY ..........................18
4.7. ANNOTATION Message Data Item in APPEND ....................18
4.8. ANNOTATION Criterion in SEARCH ............................19
4.9. ANNOTATION Key in SORT ....................................20
4.10. New ACL Rights ...........................................21
5. Formal Syntax ..................................................21
6. IANA Considerations ............................................23
6.1. Entry and Attribute Registration Template .................23
6.2. Entry Registrations .......................................24
6.2.1. /comment ...........................................24
6.2.2. /flags .............................................24
6.2.3. /altsubject ........................................25
6.2.4. /<section-part>/comment ............................25
6.2.5. /<section-part>/flags/seen .........................26
6.2.6. /<section-part>/flags/answered .....................26
6.2.7. /<section-part>/flags/flagged ......................27
6.2.8. /<section-part>/flags/forwarded ....................27
6.3. Attribute Registrations ...................................28
6.3.1. value ..............................................28
6.3.2. size ...............................................28
6.4. Capability Registration ...................................28
7. Internationalization Considerations ............................29
8. Security Considerations ........................................29
9. References .....................................................29
9.1. Normative References ......................................29
9.2. Informative References ....................................30
10. Acknowledgments ...............................................30
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 2]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
1. Introduction and Overview
The ANNOTATE extension is present in any IMAP [RFC3501]
implementation that returns "ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1" as one of the
supported capabilities in the CAPABILITY response.
This extension makes the following changes to the IMAP protocol:
a. adds a new ANNOTATION message data item for use in FETCH.
b. adds a new ANNOTATION message data item for use in STORE.
c. adds a new ANNOTATION search criterion for use in SEARCH.
d. adds a new ANNOTATION sort key for use in the SORT extension.
e. adds a new ANNOTATION data item for use in APPEND.
f. adds a new requirement on the COPY command.
g. adds a new ANNOTATE parameter for use with the SELECT/EXAMINE
commands.
h. adds two new response codes to indicate store failures of
annotations.
i. adds a new untagged response code for the SELECT or EXAMINE
commands to indicate the maximum sized annotation that can be
stored.
j. adds a new Access Control List (ACL) "bit" for use with the ACL
extensions [RFC2086] and [RFC4314].
The data model used for the storage of annotations is based on the
Application Configuration Access Protocol [RFC2244]. Note that there
is no inheritance in annotations.
If a server supports annotations, then it MUST store all annotation
data permanently, i.e., there is no concept of "session only"
annotations that would correspond to the behavior of "session" flags
as defined in the IMAP base specification.
In order to provide optimum support for a disconnected client (one
that needs to synchronize annotations for use when offline), servers
SHOULD also support the Conditional STORE [RFC4551] extension.
The rest of this document describes the data model and protocol
changes more rigorously.
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 3]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
2. Conventions Used in This Document
The examples in this document use "C:" and "S:" to indicate lines
sent by the client and server, respectively.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
3. Data Model
3.1. Overview
The data model for annotations in ANNOTATE uses a uniquely named
entry that contains a set of standard attributes. Thus, a single
coherent unit of "meta data" for a message is stored as a single
entry, made up of several attributes.
For example, a comment annotation added to a message has an entry
name of "/comment". This entry is composed of several attributes
such as "value", "size", etc., that contain the properties and data
of the entry.
The protocol changes to IMAP, described below, allow a client to
access or change the values of any attribute in any entry in a
message annotation, assuming it has sufficient access rights to do so
(see Section 3.4 for specifics).
3.2. Namespace of Entries and Attributes
A message may contain zero or more annotations, each of which is a
single uniquely named entry. Each entry has a hierarchical name,
with each component of the name separated by a slash ("/"). An entry
name MUST NOT contain two consecutive "/" characters and MUST NOT end
with a "/" character.
Each entry is made up of a set of attributes. Each attribute has a
hierarchical name, with each component of the name separated by a
period ("."). An attribute name MUST NOT contain two consecutive "."
characters and MUST NOT end with a "." character.
The value of an attribute is "NIL" (has no value), or is a string of
zero or more octets.
Entry and attribute names MUST NOT contain asterisk ("*") or percent
("%") characters, and MUST NOT contain non-ASCII characters or the
NULL octet. Invalid entry or attribute names result in a BAD
response in any IMAP commands where they are used.
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 4]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
Attribute names MUST NOT contain any hierarchical components with the
names "priv" or "shared", as those have special meaning (see Section
3.3).
Entry and attribute names are case-sensitive.
Use of control or punctuation characters in entry and attribute names
is strongly discouraged.
This specification defines an initial set of entry and attribute
names available for use in message annotations. In addition, an
extension mechanism is described to allow additional names to be
added as needed.
3.2.1. Entry Names
Entry names MUST be specified in a standards track or IESG approved
experimental RFC, or fall under the vendor namespace. See Section
6.1 for the registration template.
/
Defines the top-level of entries associated with an entire
message. This entry itself does not contain any attributes. All
entries that start with a numeric character ("0" - "9") refer to
an annotation on a specific body part. All other entries are for
annotations on the entire message.
/comment
Defines a comment or note associated with an entire message.
/flags
This entry hierarchy is reserved for future use.
/altsubject
Contains text supplied by the message recipient to be used by the
client, instead of the original message Subject.
/vendor/<vendor-token>
Defines the top-level of entries associated with an entire message
as created by a particular product of some vendor. These sub-
entries can be used by vendors to provide client-specific
annotations. The vendor-token MUST be registered with IANA, using
the [RFC2244] vendor subtree registry.
/<section-part>
Defines the top-level of entries associated with a specific body
part of a message. This entry itself does not contain any
attributes. The section-part is a numeric part specifier. Its
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 5]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
syntax is the same as the section-part ABNF element defined in
[RFC3501]. The server MUST return a BAD response if the client
uses an incorrect part specifier (either incorrect syntax or a
specifier referring to a non-existent part). The server MUST
return a BAD response if the client uses an empty part specifier
(which is used in IMAP to represent the entire message).
/<section-part>/comment
Defines a comment or note associated with a specific body part of
a message.
/<section-part>/flags
Defines the top-level of entries associated with the flag state
for a specific body part of a message. All sub-entries are
maintained entirely by the client. There is no implicit change to
any flag by the server.
/<section-part>/flags/seen
This is similar to the IMAP \Seen flag, except it applies
to only the body part referenced by the entry.
/<section-part>/flags/answered
This is similar to the IMAP \Answered flag, except it
applies to only the body part referenced by the entry.
/<section-part>/flags/flagged
This is similar to the IMAP \Flagged flag, except it
applies to only the body part referenced by the entry.
/<section-part>/flags/forwarded
This is similar to the IMAP $Forwarded keyword, except it
applies to only the body part referenced by the entry.
Defines flags for a specific body part of a message. The "value"
attribute of each of the entries described above must be either
"1", "0", or "NIL". "1" corresponds to the flag being set.
/<section-part>/vendor/<vendor-token>
Defines the top-level of entries associated with a specific body
part of a message as created by a particular product of some
vendor. This entry can be used by vendors to provide client
specific annotations. The vendor-token MUST be registered with
IANA.
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 6]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
3.2.2. Attribute Names
Attribute names MUST be specified in a standards track or IESG
approved experimental RFC. See Section 6.1 for the registration
template.
All attribute names implicitly have a ".priv" and a ".shared" suffix
that maps to private and shared versions of the entry. Searching or
fetching without using either suffix will include both. The client
MUST specify either a ".priv" or ".shared" suffix when storing an
annotation or sorting on annotations.
value
A string or binary data representing the value of the annotation.
To delete an annotation, the client can store "NIL" into the
value. If the client requests the value attribute for a non-
existent entry, then the server MUST return "NIL" for the value.
The content represented by the string is determined by the
content-type used to register the entry (see Section 6.1 for entry
registration templates). Where applicable, the registered
content-type MUST include a charset parameter. Text values SHOULD
use the utf-8 [RFC3629] character set. Note that binary data
(data which may contain the NULL octet) is allowed (e.g., for
storing images), and this extension uses the "literal8" syntax
element [RFC4466] to allow such data to be written to or read from
the server.
size
The size of the value, in octets. Set automatically by the
server, read-only to clients. If the client requests the size
attribute for a non-existent entry, then the server MUST return
"0" (zero) for the size.
3.3. Private Versus Shared
Some IMAP mailboxes are private, accessible only to the owning user.
Other mailboxes are not, either because the owner has set an ACL
[RFC4314] that permits access by other users, or because it is a
shared mailbox.
This raises the issue of shared versus private annotations.
If all annotations are private, it is then impossible to have
annotations in a shared or otherwise non-private mailbox be visible
to other users. This eliminates what could be a useful aspect of
annotations in a shared environment. An example of such use is a
shared IMAP folder containing bug reports. Engineers may want to use
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 7]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
annotations to add information to existing messages, indicate
assignments, status, etc. This use requires shared annotations.
If all annotations are shared, it is impossible to use annotations
for private notes on messages in shared mailboxes. Also, modifying
an ACL to permit access to a mailbox by other users may
unintentionally expose private information.
There are also situations in which both shared and private
annotations are useful. For example, an administrator may want to
set shared annotations on messages in a shared folder, which
individual users may wish to supplement with additional notes.
If shared and private annotations are to coexist, we need a clear way
to differentiate them. Also, it should be as easy as possible for a
client to access both and not overlook either. There is also a
danger in allowing a client to store an annotation without knowing if
it is shared or private.
This document proposes two standard suffixes for all attributes:
".shared" and ".priv". A SEARCH or FETCH command that specifies
neither, uses both. STORE, APPEND, and SORT commands MUST explicitly
use ".priv" or ".shared" suffixes.
If the ANNOTATE extension is present, support for shared annotations
in servers is REQUIRED, while support for private annotations in
servers is OPTIONAL. This recognizes the fact that support for
private annotations may introduce a significant increase in
complexity to a server in terms of tracking ownership of the
annotations, how quota is determined for users based on their own
annotations, etc. Clients that support the ANNOTATE extension MUST
handle both shared and private annotations.
3.4. Access Control
A user needs to have appropriate rights in order to read or write
".priv" or ".shared" annotation values. How those rights are
calculated depends on whether or not the ACL [RFC2086] extension or
its update [RFC4314] is present. If a client attempts to store or
fetch an annotation to which they do not have the appropriate rights,
the server MUST respond with a NO response.
When the ACL extension is not present, access to annotation values is
governed by the nature of the selected state, in particular whether
the mailbox was SELECTED or EXAMINED in READ-ONLY or READ-WRITE mode.
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 8]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
When the ACL extension is present, the server MUST recognize the new
ACL "n" right, in addition to the ones defined by the ACL extension
itself.
For ".priv" annotation values, the "r" right controls both read and
write access. When it is on, access to ".priv" annotations is
allowed; when it is off, access to ".priv" annotations is disallowed.
For ".shared" annotation values, the "r" right controls read access.
When it is on, ".shared" annotations can be read; when it is off,
".shared" annotations cannot be read.
For ".shared" annotation values, the "n" right controls write access.
When it is on, ".shared" annotations can be changed or created
through either a STORE or APPEND command; when it is off, ".shared"
annotations cannot be changed or created. The "n" right constitutes
a "shared flag right" as defined in Section 6.2 of [RFC4314].
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 9]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
A summary of all the access control restrictions is tabulated below
+---------------+---------------+-----------------------------------+
| Server Type | Action on | Type of mailbox |
| | annotation | |
+===============+===============+===================================+
| | | |
| | read .priv | Any mailbox that can be SELECTED |
| | values | or EXAMINED. |
| | | |
| +---------------+-----------------------------------+
| | | |
| | write .priv | Any SELECTED [READ-WRITE] mailbox.|
| | values | SELECTED [READ-ONLY] mailboxes MAY|
| Server | | also permit writes. |
| without | | |
| ACL Extension +---------------+-----------------------------------+
| | | |
| | read .shared | Any mailbox that can be SELECTED |
| | values | or EXAMINED. |
| | | |
| +---------------+-----------------------------------+
| | | |
| | write .shared | Any mailbox that can be SELECTED |
| | values | or EXAMINED and is [READ-WRITE]. |
| | | |
+---------------+---------------+-----------------------------------+
| | | |
| | read .priv | Any mailbox with the "r" |
| | values | ACL right. |
| | | |
| +---------------+-----------------------------------+
| | | |
| | write .priv | Any mailbox with the "r" |
| Server | values | ACL right. |
| with | | |
| ACL Extension +---------------+-----------------------------------+
| | | |
| | read .shared | Any mailbox with the "r" |
| | values | ACL right. |
| | | |
| +---------------+-----------------------------------+
| | | |
| | write .shared | Any mailbox with the "n" |
| | values | ACL right. |
| | | |
+---------------+---------------+-----------------------------------+
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 10]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
3.5. Access to Standard IMAP Flags and Keywords
Due to the ambiguity of how private and shared values would map to
the base IMAP flag and keyword values, the ANNOTATE extension does
not expose IMAP flags or keywords as entries. However, the /flags
annotation entry is reserved for future use and MUST NOT be used by
clients or servers supporting this extension.
Clients that need to implement shared and private "flags" can create
their own annotation entries for those, completely bypassing the base
IMAP flag/keyword behavior.
4. IMAP Protocol Changes
4.1. General Considerations
Servers may be able to offer only a limited level of support for
annotations in mailboxes, and it is useful for clients to be able to
know what level of support is available. Servers MUST return an
ANNOTATIONS response code during the SELECT or EXAMINE command for a
mailbox to indicate the level of support. Possible data items used
with the ANNOTATIONS response code are:
"NONE" - this indicates that the mailbox being selected does not
support annotations at all. Clients MUST NOT attempt to use
annotation extensions in commands for this mailbox.
"READ-ONLY" - this indicates that the annotations supported by the
mailbox cannot be changed by the client. Clients MUST NOT attempt
to store annotations on any messages in a mailbox with this
response code.
"NOPRIVATE" - this indicates that the server does not support
private annotations on the mailbox. Only shared annotations are
supported. Clients SHOULD only attempt to read or store
annotations attributes with the ".shared" suffix. If a client
uses an attribute with the ".priv" suffix in a FETCH command, then
servers should return the attribute value in the FETCH response as
"NIL". If a client uses an attribute with the ".priv" suffix in a
STORE command (or an APPEND command targeted at the mailbox), then
the server MUST return a NO response.
numeric values - if servers support writable annotations, then the
server MUST indicate the maximum size in octets for an annotation
value by providing the maximum size value in the response code.
Clients MUST NOT store annotation values of a size greater than
the amount indicated by the server. Servers MUST accept a minimum
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 11]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
annotation data size of at least 1024 octets if annotations can be
written.
In addition, the server MAY limit the total number of annotations for
a single message. However, the server MUST provide a minimum
annotation count per message of at least 10.
4.2. ANNOTATE Parameter with the SELECT/EXAMINE Commands
The ANNOTATE extension defines a single optional SELECT parameter
[RFC4466] "ANNOTATE", which is used to turn on unsolicited responses
for annotations as described in Section 4.4. This optional parameter
results in a per-mailbox state change, i.e., it must be used in each
SELECT/EXAMINE command in order to be effective, irrespective of
whether it was used in a previous SELECT/EXAMINE during the same
session.
Example:
C: a SELECT INBOX (ANNOTATE)
S: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen)
S: * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft
\Deleted \Seen \*)]
S: * 10268 EXISTS
S: * 1 RECENT
S: * OK [UNSEEN 10268]
S: * OK [UIDVALIDITY 890061587]
S: * OK [UIDNEXT 34643]
S: * OK [ANNOTATIONS 20480 NOPRIVATE]
S: a OK [READ-WRITE] Completed
In the above example, a SELECT command with the ANNOTATE parameter
is issued. The response from the server includes the required
ANNOTATIONS response that indicates that the server supports
annotations up to a maximum size of 20480 octets, and does not
support private annotations (only shared).
4.3. ANNOTATION Message Data Item in FETCH Command
This extension adds an ANNOTATION message data item to the FETCH
command. This allows clients to retrieve annotations for a range of
messages in the currently selected mailbox.
ANNOTATION <entry-specifier> <attribute-specifier>
The ANNOTATION message data item, when used by the client in the
FETCH command, takes an entry specifier and an attribute
specifier.
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 12]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
Example:
C: a FETCH 1 (ANNOTATION (/comment value))
S: * 1 FETCH (ANNOTATION (/comment
(value.priv "My comment"
value.shared "Group note")))
S: a OK Fetch complete
In the above example, the content of the "value" attribute for the
"/comment" entry is requested by the client and returned by the
server. Since neither ".shared" nor ".priv" was specified, both
are returned.
"*" and "%" wild card characters can be used in entry specifiers to
match one or more characters at that position, with the exception
that "%" does not match the "/" hierarchy delimiter. Thus, an entry
specifier of "/%" matches entries such as "/comment" and
"/altsubject", but not "/1/comment".
Example:
C: a UID FETCH 1123 (UID ANNOTATION
(/* (value.priv size.priv)))
S: * 12 FETCH (UID 1123 ANNOTATION
(/comment (value.priv "My comment"
size.priv "10")
/altsubject (value.priv "Rhinoceroses!"
size.priv "13")
/vendor/foobar/label.priv
(value.priv "label43"
size.priv "7")
/vendor/foobar/personality
(value.priv "Tallulah Bankhead"
size.priv "17")))
S: a OK Fetch complete
In the above example, the contents of the private "value" and
"size" attributes for any entries in the "/" hierarchy are
requested by the client and returned by the server.
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 13]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
Example:
C: a FETCH 1 (ANNOTATION (/% value.shared))
S: * 1 FETCH (ANNOTATION
(/comment (value.shared "Patch Mangler")
/altsubject (value.shared "Patches? We don't
need no steenkin patches!")))
S: a OK Fetch complete
In the above example, the contents of the shared "value"
attributes for entries at the top level only of the "/" hierarchy
are requested by the client and returned by the server.
Entry and attribute specifiers can be lists of atomic specifiers, so
that multiple items of each type may be returned in a single FETCH
command.
Example:
C: a FETCH 1 (ANNOTATION
((/comment /altsubject) value.priv))
S: * 1 FETCH (ANNOTATION
(/comment (value.priv "What a chowder-head")
/altsubject (value.priv "How to crush beer cans")))
S: a OK Fetch complete
In the above example, the contents of the private "value"
attributes for the two entries "/comment" and "/altsubject" are
requested by the client and returned by the server.
4.4. ANNOTATION Message Data Item in FETCH Response
The ANNOTATION message data item in the FETCH response displays
information about annotations in a message.
ANNOTATION parenthesized list
The response consists of a list of entries, each of which have a
list of attribute-value pairs.
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 14]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
Example:
C: a FETCH 1 (ANNOTATION (/comment value))
S: * 1 FETCH (ANNOTATION (/comment
(value.priv "My comment"
value.shared NIL)))
S: a OK Fetch complete
In the above example, a single entry with a single attribute-value
pair is returned by the server. Since the client did not specify
a ".shared" or ".priv" suffix, both are returned. Only the
private attribute has a value (the shared value is "NIL").
Example:
C: a FETCH 1 (ANNOTATION
((/comment /altsubject) value))
S: * 1 FETCH (ANNOTATION
(/comment (value.priv "My comment"
value.shared NIL)
/altsubject (value.priv "My subject"
value.shared NIL)))
S: a OK Fetch complete
In the above example, two entries, each with a single attribute-
value pair, are returned by the server. Since the client did not
specify a ".shared" or ".priv" suffix, both are returned. Only
the private attributes have values; the shared attributes are
"NIL".
Example:
C: a FETCH 1 (ANNOTATION
(/comment (value size)))
S: * 1 FETCH (ANNOTATION
(/comment
(value.priv "My comment"
value.shared NIL
size.priv "10"
size.shared "0")))
S: a OK Fetch complete
In the above example, a single entry with two attribute-value
pairs is returned by the server. Since the client did not specify
a ".shared" or ".priv" suffix, both are returned. Only the
private attributes have values; the shared attributes are "NIL".
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 15]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
Servers SHOULD send ANNOTATION message data items in unsolicited
FETCH responses if an annotation entry is changed by a third-party,
and the ANNOTATE select parameter was used. This allows servers to
keep clients updated with changes to annotations by other clients.
Unsolicited ANNOTATION responses MUST NOT include ANNOTATION data
values -- only the entry name of the ANNOTATION that has changed.
This restriction avoids sending ANNOTATION data values (which may be
large) to a client unless the client explicitly asks for the value.
Example:
C: a STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen)
S: * 1 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen))
ANNOTATION (/comment))
S: a OK STORE complete
In the above example, an unsolicited ANNOTATION response is
returned during a STORE command. The unsolicited response
contains only the entry name of the annotation that changed, and
not its value.
4.5. ANNOTATION Message Data Item in STORE
ANNOTATION <parenthesized entry-attribute-value list>
Sets the specified list of entries by adding or replacing the
specified attributes with the values provided. Clients can use
"NIL" for values of attributes it wants to remove from entries.
The ANNOTATION message data item used with the STORE command has an
implicit ".SILENT" behavior. This means the server does not generate
an untagged FETCH in response to the STORE command and assumes that
the client updates its own cache if the command succeeds. Though
note, that if the Conditional STORE extension [RFC4551] is present,
then an untagged FETCH response with a MODSEQ data item will be
returned by the server as required by [RFC4551].
If the server is unable to store an annotation because the size of
its value is too large, the server MUST return a tagged NO response
with a "[ANNOTATE TOOBIG]" response code.
If the server is unable to store a new annotation because the maximum
number of allowed annotations has already been reached, the server
MUST return a tagged NO response with a "[ANNOTATE TOOMANY]" response
code.
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 16]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
Example:
C: a STORE 1 ANNOTATION (/comment
(value.priv "My new comment"))
S: a OK Store complete
In the above example, the entry "/comment" is created (if not
already present). Its private attribute "value" is created if not
already present, or replaced if it exists. "value.priv" is set to
"My new comment".
Example:
C: a STORE 1 ANNOTATION (/comment
(value.shared NIL))
S: a OK Store complete
In the above example, the shared "value" attribute of the entry
"/comment" is removed by storing "NIL" into the attribute.
Multiple entries can be set in a single STORE command by listing
entry-attribute-value pairs in the list.
Example:
C: a STORE 1 ANNOTATION (/comment
(value.priv "Get tix Tuesday")
/altsubject
(value.priv "Wots On"))
S: a OK Store complete
In the above example, the entries "/comment" and "/altsubject" are
created (if not already present) and the private attribute "value"
is created or replaced for each entry.
Multiple attributes can be set in a single STORE command by listing
multiple attribute-value pairs in the entry list.
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 17]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
Example:
C: a STORE 1 ANNOTATION (/comment
(value.priv "My new comment"
value.shared "foo's bar"))
S: a OK Store complete
In the above example, the entry "/comment" is created (if not
already present) and the private and shared "value" attributes are
created if not already present, or replaced if they exist.
4.6. ANNOTATION Interaction with COPY
The COPY command can be used to move messages from one mailbox to
another on the same server. Servers that support the ANNOTATION
extension MUST, for each message being copied, copy all ".priv"
annotation data for the current user only, and all ".shared"
annotation data along with the message to the new mailbox. The only
exceptions to this are if the destination mailbox permissions are
such that either the ".priv" or ".shared" annotations are not
allowed, or if the destination mailbox is of a type that does not
support annotations or does not support storing of annotations (a
mailbox that returns a "NONE" or "READ-ONLY" response code in its
ANNOTATIONS response), or if the destination mailbox cannot support
the size of an annotation because it exceeds the ANNOTATIONS value.
Servers MUST NOT copy ".priv" annotation data for users other than
the current user.
4.7. ANNOTATION Message Data Item in APPEND
ANNOTATION <parenthesized entry-attribute-value list>
Sets the specified list of entries and attributes in the resulting
message.
The APPEND command can include annotations for the message being
appended via the addition of a new append data item [RFC4466]. The
new data item can also be used with the multi-append [RFC3502]
extension that allows multiple messages to be appended via a single
APPEND command.
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 18]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
Example:
C: a APPEND drafts ANNOTATION (/comment
(value.priv "Don't send until I say so")) {310}
S: + Ready for literal data
C: MIME-Version: 1.0
...
C:
S: a OK APPEND completed
In the above example, a comment with a private value is added to a
new message appended to the mailbox. The ellipsis represents the
bulk of the message.
4.8. ANNOTATION Criterion in SEARCH
ANNOTATION <entry-name> <attribute-name> <value>
The ANNOTATION criterion for the SEARCH command allows a client to
search for a specified string in the value of an annotation entry of
a message.
Messages that have annotations with entries matching <entry-name>,
attributes matching <attribute-name>, and the specified string
<value> in their values are returned in the SEARCH results. The "*"
character can be used in the entry name field to match any content in
those items. The "%" character can be used in the entry name field
to match a single level of hierarchy only.
Only the "value", "value.priv", and "value.shared" attributes can be
searched. Clients MUST NOT specify an attribute other than either
"value", "value.priv", or "value.shared". Servers MUST return a BAD
response if the client tries to search any other attribute.
Example:
C: a SEARCH ANNOTATION /comment value "IMAP4"
S: * SEARCH 2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23
S: a OK Search complete
In the above example, the message numbers of any messages
containing the string "IMAP4" in the shared or private "value"
attribute of the "/comment" entry are returned in the search
results.
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 19]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
Example:
C: a SEARCH ANNOTATION * value.priv "IMAP4"
S: * SEARCH 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34
S: a OK Search complete
In the above example, the message numbers of any messages
containing the string "IMAP4" in the private "value" attribute of
any entry are returned in the search results.
4.9. ANNOTATION Key in SORT
ANNOTATION <entry-name> <attribute-name>
The ANNOTATION criterion for the SORT command [RFC5256] instructs the
server to return the sequence numbers or Unique Identifiers (UIDs) of
messages in a mailbox, sorted using the values of the specified
annotations. The ANNOTATION criterion is available if the server
returns both ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1 and SORT as supported capabilities
in the CAPABILITY command response.
Messages are sorted using the values of the <attribute-name>
attributes in the <entry-name> entries.
Clients MUST provide either the ".priv" or ".shared" suffix to the
attribute name to ensure that the server knows which specific value
to sort on.
Only the "value.priv" and "value.shared" attributes can be used for
sorting. Clients MUST NOT specify an attribute other than either
"value.priv" or "value.shared". Servers MUST return a BAD response
if the client tries to sort on any other attribute.
When either "value.priv" or "value.shared" is being sorted, the
server MUST use the character set value specified in the SORT command
to determine the appropriate sort order.
Example:
C: a SORT (ANNOTATION /altsubject value.shared) UTF-8 ALL
S: * SORT 2 3 4 5 1 11 10 6 7 9 8
S: a OK Sort complete
In the above example, the message numbers of all messages are
returned, sorted according to the shared "value" attribute of the
"/altsubject" entry.
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 20]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
Note that the ANNOTATION sort key must include a fully specified
entry -- wild cards are not allowed.
4.10. New ACL Rights
As discussed in Section 3.4, this extension adds a new "n" right to
the list of rights provided by the ACL extensions [RFC2086] and
[RFC4314].
5. Formal Syntax
The following syntax specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur
Form (ABNF) notation as specified in [RFC5234].
Non-terminals referenced but not defined below are as defined by
[RFC3501] with the new definitions in [RFC4466] superseding those in
[RFC3501].
Except as noted otherwise, all alphabetic characters are case-
insensitive. The use of upper or lower case characters to define
token strings is for editorial clarity only. Implementations MUST
accept these strings in a case-insensitive fashion.
ann-size = "NONE" /
(("READ-ONLY" / nz-number)
[SP "NOPRIVATE"])
; response codes indicating the level of
; support for annotations in a mailbox
append-ext =/ att-annotate
; modifies [RFC3501] extension behaviour
att-annotate = "ANNOTATION" SP
"(" entry-att *(SP entry-att) ")"
att-search = "value" / "value.priv" / "value.shared"
; the only attributes that can be searched
att-sort = "value.priv" / "value.shared"
; the only attributes that can be sorted
att-value = attrib SP value
attrib = astring
; dot-separated attribute name
; MUST NOT contain "*" or "%"
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 21]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
attribs = attrib / "(" attrib *(SP attrib) ")"
; one or more attribute specifiers
capability =/ "ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1"
; defines the capability for this extension
entries = entry-match /
"(" entry-match *(SP entry-match) ")"
entry = astring
; slash-separated path to entry
; MUST NOT contain "*" or "%"
entry-att = entry SP "(" att-value *(SP att-value) ")"
entry-match = list-mailbox
; slash-separated path to entry
; MAY contain "*" or "%" for use as wild cards
fetch-att =/ "ANNOTATION" SP "(" entries SP attribs ")"
; modifies original IMAP fetch-att
msg-att-dynamic =/ "ANNOTATION" SP
( "(" entry-att *(SP entry-att) ")" /
"(" entry *(SP entry) ")" )
; extends FETCH response with annotation data
resp-text-code =/ "ANNOTATE" SP "TOOBIG" /
"ANNOTATE" SP "TOOMANY" /
"ANNOTATIONS" SP ann-size
; new response codes
search-key =/ "ANNOTATION" SP entry-match SP att-search
SP value
; modifies original IMAP search-key
select-param =/ "ANNOTATE"
; defines the select parameter used with
; ANNOTATE extension
sort-key =/ "ANNOTATION" SP entry SP att-sort
; modifies original sort-key
store-att-flags =/ att-annotate
; modifies original IMAP STORE command
value = nstring / literal8
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 22]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
6. IANA Considerations
Entry names MUST be specified in a standards track or IESG approved
experimental RFC, or fall under the vendor namespace. Vendor names
MUST be registered.
Attribute names MUST be specified in a standards track or IESG
approved experimental RFC.
Each entry registration MUST include a content-type that is used to
indicate the nature of the annotation value. Where applicable, a
charset parameter MUST be included with the content-type.
6.1. Entry and Attribute Registration Template
To: iana@iana.org
Subject: IMAP Annotate Registration
Please register the following IMAP Annotate item:
[] Entry [] Attribute
Name: ______________________________
Description: _______________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
Content-Type:_______________________
Contact person: ____________________
email: ____________________
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 23]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
6.2. Entry Registrations
The following templates specify the IANA registrations of annotation
entries specified in this document.
6.2.1. /comment
To: iana@iana.org
Subject: IMAP Annotate Registration
Please register the following IMAP Annotate item:
[X] Entry [] Attribute
Name: /comment
Description: Defined in IMAP ANNOTATE extension document.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Contact person: Cyrus Daboo
email: cyrus@daboo.name
6.2.2. /flags
To: iana@iana.org
Subject: IMAP Annotate Registration
Please register the following IMAP Annotate item:
[X] Entry [] Attribute
Name: /flags
Description: Reserved entry hierarchy.
Content-Type: -
Contact person: Cyrus Daboo
email: cyrus@daboo.name
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 24]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
6.2.3. /altsubject
To: iana@iana.org
Subject: IMAP Annotate Registration
Please register the following IMAP Annotate item:
[X] Entry [] Attribute
Name: /altsubject
Description: Defined in IMAP ANNOTATE extension document.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Contact person: Cyrus Daboo
email: cyrus@daboo.name
6.2.4. /<section-part>/comment
To: iana@iana.org
Subject: IMAP Annotate Registration
Please register the following IMAP Annotate item:
[X] Entry [] Attribute
Name: /<section-part>/comment
Description: Defined in IMAP ANNOTATE extension document.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Contact person: Cyrus Daboo
email: cyrus@daboo.name
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 25]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
6.2.5. /<section-part>/flags/seen
To: iana@iana.org
Subject: IMAP Annotate Registration
Please register the following IMAP Annotate item:
[X] Entry [] Attribute
Name: /<section-part>/flags/seen
Description: Defined in IMAP ANNOTATE extension document.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Contact person: Cyrus Daboo
email: cyrus@daboo.name
6.2.6. /<section-part>/flags/answered
To: iana@iana.org
Subject: IMAP Annotate Registration
Please register the following IMAP Annotate item:
[X] Entry [] Attribute
Name: /<section-part>/flags/answered
Description: Defined in IMAP ANNOTATE extension document.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Contact person: Cyrus Daboo
email: cyrus@daboo.name
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 26]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
6.2.7. /<section-part>/flags/flagged
To: iana@iana.org
Subject: IMAP Annotate Registration
Please register the following IMAP Annotate item:
[X] Entry [] Attribute
Name: /<section-part>/flags/flagged
Description: Defined in IMAP ANNOTATE extension document.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Contact person: Cyrus Daboo
email: cyrus@daboo.name
6.2.8. /<section-part>/flags/forwarded
To: iana@iana.org
Subject: IMAP Annotate Registration
Please register the following IMAP Annotate item:
[X] Entry [] Attribute
Name: /<section-part>/flags/forwarded
Description: Defined in IMAP ANNOTATE extension document.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Contact person: Cyrus Daboo
email: cyrus@daboo.name
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 27]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
6.3. Attribute Registrations
The following templates specify the IANA registrations of annotation
attributes specified in this document.
6.3.1. value
To: iana@iana.org
Subject: IMAP Annotate Registration
Please register the following IMAP Annotate item:
[] Entry [X] Attribute
Name: value
Description: Defined in IMAP ANNOTATE extension document.
Contact person: Cyrus Daboo
email: cyrus@daboo.name
6.3.2. size
To: iana@iana.org
Subject: IMAP Annotate Registration
Please register the following IMAP Annotate item:
[] Entry [X] Attribute
Name: size
Description: Defined in IMAP ANNOTATE extension document.
Contact person: Cyrus Daboo
email: cyrus@daboo.name
6.4. Capability Registration
This document registers "ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1" as an IMAPEXT
capability.
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 28]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
7. Internationalization Considerations
Annotations may contain values that include text strings, and both
searching and sorting are possible with annotations. Servers MUST
follow standard IMAP text normalization, character set conversion,
and collation rules when such operations are carried out, as would be
done for other textual fields being searched or sorted on.
8. Security Considerations
Annotations whose values are intended to remain private MUST be
stored in ".priv" values instead of ".shared" values, which may be
accessible to other users.
Excluding the above issues, the ANNOTATE extension does not raise any
security considerations that are not present in the base IMAP
protocol; these issues are discussed in [RFC3501].
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC2086] Myers, J., "IMAP4 ACL extension", RFC 2086, January 1997.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2244] Newman, C. and J. Myers, "ACAP -- Application
Configuration Access Protocol", RFC 2244, November 1997.
[RFC3501] Crispin, M., "INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION
4rev1", RFC 3501, March 2003.
[RFC3502] Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) -
MULTIAPPEND Extension", RFC 3502, March 2003.
[RFC3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, November 2003.
[RFC4314] Melnikov, A., "IMAP4 Access Control List (ACL) Extension",
RFC 4314, December 2005.
[RFC4466] Melnikov, A. and C. Daboo, "Collected Extensions to IMAP4
ABNF", RFC 4466, April 2006.
[RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed., and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for
Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January
2008.
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 29]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
[RFC5256] Crispin, M. and K. Murchison, "Internet Message Access
Protocol - SORT and THREAD Extensions", RFC 5256, June
2008.
9.2. Informative References
[RFC4551] Melnikov, A. and S. Hole, "IMAP Extension for Conditional
STORE Operation or Quick Flag Changes Resynchronization",
RFC 4551, June 2006.
10. Acknowledgments
Many thanks to Chris Newman for his detailed comments on the first
draft of this document, and to the participants at the ACAP working
dinner in Pittsburgh. The participants of the IMAPext working group
made significant contributions to this work.
Authors' Addresses
Cyrus Daboo
Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
USA
EMail: cyrus@daboo.name
URI: http://www.apple.com/
Randall Gellens
QUALCOMM Incorporated
5775 Morehouse Dr.
San Diego, CA 92121-2779
USA
EMail: randy@qualcomm.com
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 30]
RFC 5257 IMAP ANNOTATE Extension June 2008
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Daboo & Gellens Experimental [Page 31]