Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)
RFC 5880
| Document | Type |
RFC
- Proposed Standard
(June 2010)
Errata
IPR
Was
draft-ietf-bfd-base
(bfd WG)
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Dave Katz , David Ward | ||
| Last updated | 2020-01-21 | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | RFC 5880 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Adrian Farrel | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
RFC 5880
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) D. Katz
Request for Comments: 5880 D. Ward
Category: Standards Track Juniper Networks
ISSN: 2070-1721 June 2010
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)
Abstract
This document describes a protocol intended to detect faults in the
bidirectional path between two forwarding engines, including
interfaces, data link(s), and to the extent possible the forwarding
engines themselves, with potentially very low latency. It operates
independently of media, data protocols, and routing protocols.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5880.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................3
1.1. Conventions Used in This Document ..........................4
2. Design ..........................................................4
3. Protocol Overview ...............................................5
3.1. Addressing and Session Establishment .......................5
3.2. Operating Modes ............................................5
4. BFD Control Packet Format .......................................7
4.1. Generic BFD Control Packet Format ..........................7
4.2. Simple Password Authentication Section Format .............11
4.3. Keyed MD5 and Meticulous Keyed MD5 Authentication
Section Format ............................................11
4.4. Keyed SHA1 and Meticulous Keyed SHA1
Authentication Section Format .............................13
5. BFD Echo Packet Format .........................................14
6. Elements of Procedure ..........................................14
6.1. Overview ..................................................14
6.2. BFD State Machine .........................................16
6.3. Demultiplexing and the Discriminator Fields ...............17
6.4. The Echo Function and Asymmetry ...........................18
6.5. The Poll Sequence .........................................19
6.6. Demand Mode ...............................................19
6.7. Authentication ............................................21
6.7.1. Enabling and Disabling Authentication ..............21
6.7.2. Simple Password Authentication .....................22
6.7.3. Keyed MD5 and Meticulous Keyed MD5 Authentication ..23
6.7.4. Keyed SHA1 and Meticulous Keyed SHA1
Authentication .....................................25
6.8. Functional Specifics ......................................27
6.8.1. State Variables ....................................27
6.8.2. Timer Negotiation ..................................30
6.8.3. Timer Manipulation .................................31
6.8.4. Calculating the Detection Time .....................32
6.8.5. Detecting Failures with the Echo Function ..........33
6.8.6. Reception of BFD Control Packets ...................33
6.8.7. Transmitting BFD Control Packets ...................36
6.8.8. Reception of BFD Echo Packets ......................39
6.8.9. Transmission of BFD Echo Packets ...................39
6.8.10. Min Rx Interval Change ............................40
6.8.11. Min Tx Interval Change ............................40
6.8.12. Detect Multiplier Change ..........................40
6.8.13. Enabling or Disabling The Echo Function ...........40
6.8.14. Enabling or Disabling Demand Mode .................40
6.8.15. Forwarding Plane Reset ............................41
6.8.16. Administrative Control ............................41
6.8.17. Concatenated Paths ................................41
6.8.18. Holding Down Sessions .............................42
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
7. Operational Considerations .....................................43
8. IANA Considerations ............................................44
9. Security Considerations ........................................45
10. References ....................................................46
10.1. Normative References .....................................46
10.2. Informative References ...................................47
Appendix A. Backward Compatibility (Non-Normative) ................48
Appendix B. Contributors ..........................................48
Appendix C. Acknowledgments .......................................49
1. Introduction
An increasingly important feature of networking equipment is the
rapid detection of communication failures between adjacent systems,
in order to more quickly establish alternative paths. Detection can
come fairly quickly in certain circumstances when data link hardware
comes into play (such as Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) alarms).
However, there are media that do not provide this kind of signaling
(such as Ethernet), and some media may not detect certain kinds of
failures in the path, for example, failing interfaces or forwarding
engine components.
Networks use relatively slow "Hello" mechanisms, usually in routing
protocols, to detect failures when there is no hardware signaling to
help out. The time to detect failures ("Detection Times") available
in the existing protocols are no better than a second, which is far
too long for some applications and represents a great deal of lost
data at gigabit rates. Furthermore, routing protocol Hellos are of
no help when those routing protocols are not in use, and the
semantics of detection are subtly different -- they detect a failure
in the path between the two routing protocol engines.
The goal of Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) is to provide
low-overhead, short-duration detection of failures in the path
between adjacent forwarding engines, including the interfaces, data
link(s), and, to the extent possible, the forwarding engines
themselves.
An additional goal is to provide a single mechanism that can be used
for liveness detection over any media, at any protocol layer, with a
wide range of Detection Times and overhead, to avoid a proliferation
of different methods.
This document specifies the details of the base protocol. The use of
some mechanisms are application dependent and are specified in a
separate series of application documents. These issues are so noted.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
Note that many of the exact mechanisms are implementation dependent
and will not affect interoperability, and are thus outside the scope
of this specification. Those issues are so noted.
1.1. Conventions Used in This Document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [KEYWORDS].
2. Design
BFD is designed to detect failures in communication with a forwarding
plane next hop. It is intended to be implemented in some component
of the forwarding engine of a system, in cases where the forwarding
and control engines are separated. This not only binds the protocol
more to the forwarding plane, but decouples the protocol from the
fate of the routing protocol engine, making it useful in concert with
various "graceful restart" mechanisms for those protocols. BFD may
also be implemented in the control engine, though doing so may
preclude the detection of some kinds of failures.
BFD operates on top of any data protocol (network layer, link layer,
tunnels, etc.) being forwarded between two systems. It is always
run in a unicast, point-to-point mode. BFD packets are carried as
the payload of whatever encapsulating protocol is appropriate for the
medium and network. BFD may be running at multiple layers in a
system. The context of the operation of any particular BFD session
is bound to its encapsulation.
BFD can provide failure detection on any kind of path between
systems, including direct physical links, virtual circuits, tunnels,
MPLS Label Switched Paths (LSPs), multihop routed paths, and
unidirectional links (so long as there is some return path, of
course). Multiple BFD sessions can be established between the same
pair of systems when multiple paths between them are present in at
least one direction, even if a lesser number of paths are available
in the other direction (multiple parallel unidirectional links or
MPLS LSPs, for example).
The BFD state machine implements a three-way handshake, both when
establishing a BFD session and when tearing it down for any reason,
to ensure that both systems are aware of the state change.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
BFD can be abstracted as a simple service. The service primitives
provided by BFD are to create, destroy, and modify a session, given
the destination address and other parameters. BFD in return provides
a signal to its clients indicating when the BFD session goes up or
down.
3. Protocol Overview
BFD is a simple Hello protocol that, in many respects, is similar to
the detection components of well-known routing protocols. A pair of
systems transmit BFD packets periodically over each path between the
two systems, and if a system stops receiving BFD packets for long
enough, some component in that particular bidirectional path to the
neighboring system is assumed to have failed. Under some conditions,
systems may negotiate not to send periodic BFD packets in order to
reduce overhead.
A path is only declared to be operational when two-way communication
has been established between systems, though this does not preclude
the use of unidirectional links.
A separate BFD session is created for each communications path and
data protocol in use between two systems.
Each system estimates how quickly it can send and receive BFD packets
in order to come to an agreement with its neighbor about how rapidly
detection of failure will take place. These estimates can be
modified in real time in order to adapt to unusual situations. This
design also allows for fast systems on a shared medium with a slow
system to be able to more rapidly detect failures between the fast
systems while allowing the slow system to participate to the best of
its ability.
3.1. Addressing and Session Establishment
A BFD session is established based on the needs of the application
that will be making use of it. It is up to the application to
determine the need for BFD, and the addresses to use -- there is no
discovery mechanism in BFD. For example, an OSPF [OSPF]
implementation may request a BFD session to be established to a
neighbor discovered using the OSPF Hello protocol.
3.2. Operating Modes
BFD has two operating modes that may be selected, as well as an
additional function that can be used in combination with the two
modes.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
The primary mode is known as Asynchronous mode. In this mode, the
systems periodically send BFD Control packets to one another, and if
a number of those packets in a row are not received by the other
system, the session is declared to be down.
The second mode is known as Demand mode. In this mode, it is assumed
that a system has an independent way of verifying that it has
connectivity to the other system. Once a BFD session is established,
such a system may ask the other system to stop sending BFD Control
packets, except when the system feels the need to verify connectivity
explicitly, in which case a short sequence of BFD Control packets is
exchanged, and then the far system quiesces. Demand mode may operate
independently in each direction, or simultaneously.
An adjunct to both modes is the Echo function. When the Echo
function is active, a stream of BFD Echo packets is transmitted in
such a way as to have the other system loop them back through its
forwarding path. If a number of packets of the echoed data stream
are not received, the session is declared to be down. The Echo
function may be used with either Asynchronous or Demand mode. Since
the Echo function is handling the task of detection, the rate of
periodic transmission of Control packets may be reduced (in the case
of Asynchronous mode) or eliminated completely (in the case of Demand
mode).
Pure Asynchronous mode is advantageous in that it requires half as
many packets to achieve a particular Detection Time as does the Echo
function. It is also used when the Echo function cannot be supported
for some reason.
The Echo function has the advantage of truly testing only the
forwarding path on the remote system. This may reduce round-trip
jitter and thus allow more aggressive Detection Times, as well as
potentially detecting some classes of failure that might not
otherwise be detected.
The Echo function may be enabled individually in each direction. It
is enabled in a particular direction only when the system that loops
the Echo packets back signals that it will allow it, and when the
system that sends the Echo packets decides it wishes to.
Demand mode is useful in situations where the overhead of a periodic
protocol might prove onerous, such as a system with a very large
number of BFD sessions. It is also useful when the Echo function is
being used symmetrically. Demand mode has the disadvantage that
Detection Times are essentially driven by the heuristics of the
system implementation and are not known to the BFD protocol. Demand
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
mode may not be used when the path round-trip time is greater than
the desired Detection Time, or the protocol will fail to work
properly. See section 6.6 for more details.
4. BFD Control Packet Format
4.1. Generic BFD Control Packet Format
BFD Control packets are sent in an encapsulation appropriate to the
environment. The specific encapsulation is outside of the scope of
this specification. See the appropriate application document for
encapsulation details.
The BFD Control packet has a Mandatory Section and an optional
Authentication Section. The format of the Authentication Section, if
present, is dependent on the type of authentication in use.
The Mandatory Section of a BFD Control packet has the following
format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Vers | Diag |Sta|P|F|C|A|D|M| Detect Mult | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| My Discriminator |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Your Discriminator |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Desired Min TX Interval |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Required Min RX Interval |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Required Min Echo RX Interval |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
An optional Authentication Section MAY be present:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Auth Type | Auth Len | Authentication Data... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Version (Vers)
The version number of the protocol. This document defines
protocol version 1.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
Diagnostic (Diag)
A diagnostic code specifying the local system's reason for the
last change in session state. Values are:
0 -- No Diagnostic
1 -- Control Detection Time Expired
2 -- Echo Function Failed
3 -- Neighbor Signaled Session Down
4 -- Forwarding Plane Reset
5 -- Path Down
6 -- Concatenated Path Down
7 -- Administratively Down
8 -- Reverse Concatenated Path Down
9-31 -- Reserved for future use
This field allows remote systems to determine the reason that the
previous session failed, for example.
State (Sta)
The current BFD session state as seen by the transmitting system.
Values are:
0 -- AdminDown
1 -- Down
2 -- Init
3 -- Up
Poll (P)
If set, the transmitting system is requesting verification of
connectivity, or of a parameter change, and is expecting a packet
with the Final (F) bit in reply. If clear, the transmitting
system is not requesting verification.
Final (F)
If set, the transmitting system is responding to a received BFD
Control packet that had the Poll (P) bit set. If clear, the
transmitting system is not responding to a Poll.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
Control Plane Independent (C)
If set, the transmitting system's BFD implementation does not
share fate with its control plane (in other words, BFD is
implemented in the forwarding plane and can continue to function
through disruptions in the control plane). If clear, the
transmitting system's BFD implementation shares fate with its
control plane.
The use of this bit is application dependent and is outside the
scope of this specification. See specific application
specifications for details.
Authentication Present (A)
If set, the Authentication Section is present and the session is
to be authenticated (see section 6.7 for details).
Demand (D)
If set, Demand mode is active in the transmitting system (the
system wishes to operate in Demand mode, knows that the session is
Up in both directions, and is directing the remote system to cease
the periodic transmission of BFD Control packets). If clear,
Demand mode is not active in the transmitting system.
Multipoint (M)
This bit is reserved for future point-to-multipoint extensions to
BFD. It MUST be zero on both transmit and receipt.
Detect Mult
Detection time multiplier. The negotiated transmit interval,
multiplied by this value, provides the Detection Time for the
receiving system in Asynchronous mode.
Length
Length of the BFD Control packet, in bytes.
My Discriminator
A unique, nonzero discriminator value generated by the
transmitting system, used to demultiplex multiple BFD sessions
between the same pair of systems.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
Your Discriminator
The discriminator received from the corresponding remote system.
This field reflects back the received value of My Discriminator,
or is zero if that value is unknown.
Desired Min TX Interval
This is the minimum interval, in microseconds, that the local
system would like to use when transmitting BFD Control packets,
less any jitter applied (see section 6.8.2). The value zero is
reserved.
Required Min RX Interval
This is the minimum interval, in microseconds, between received
BFD Control packets that this system is capable of supporting,
less any jitter applied by the sender (see section 6.8.2). If
this value is zero, the transmitting system does not want the
remote system to send any periodic BFD Control packets.
Required Min Echo RX Interval
This is the minimum interval, in microseconds, between received
BFD Echo packets that this system is capable of supporting, less
any jitter applied by the sender (see section 6.8.9). If this
value is zero, the transmitting system does not support the
receipt of BFD Echo packets.
Auth Type
The authentication type in use, if the Authentication Present (A)
bit is set.
0 - Reserved
1 - Simple Password
2 - Keyed MD5
3 - Meticulous Keyed MD5
4 - Keyed SHA1
5 - Meticulous Keyed SHA1
6-255 - Reserved for future use
Auth Len
The length, in bytes, of the authentication section, including the
Auth Type and Auth Len fields.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
4.2. Simple Password Authentication Section Format
If the Authentication Present (A) bit is set in the header, and the
Authentication Type field contains 1 (Simple Password), the
Authentication Section has the following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Auth Type | Auth Len | Auth Key ID | Password... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Auth Type
The Authentication Type, which in this case is 1 (Simple
Password).
Auth Len
The length of the Authentication Section, in bytes. For Simple
Password authentication, the length is equal to the password
length plus three.
Auth Key ID
The authentication key ID in use for this packet. This allows
multiple keys to be active simultaneously.
Password
The simple password in use on this session. The password is a
binary string, and MUST be from 1 to 16 bytes in length. The
password MUST be encoded and configured according to section
6.7.2.
4.3. Keyed MD5 and Meticulous Keyed MD5 Authentication Section Format
The use of MD5-based authentication is strongly discouraged.
However, it is documented here for compatibility with existing
implementations.
If the Authentication Present (A) bit is set in the header, and the
Authentication Type field contains 2 (Keyed MD5) or 3 (Meticulous
Keyed MD5), the Authentication Section has the following format:
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Auth Type | Auth Len | Auth Key ID | Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Sequence Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Auth Key/Digest... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Auth Type
The Authentication Type, which in this case is 2 (Keyed MD5) or 3
(Meticulous Keyed MD5).
Auth Len
The length of the Authentication Section, in bytes. For Keyed MD5
and Meticulous Keyed MD5 authentication, the length is 24.
Auth Key ID
The authentication key ID in use for this packet. This allows
multiple keys to be active simultaneously.
Reserved
This byte MUST be set to zero on transmit, and ignored on receipt.
Sequence Number
The sequence number for this packet. For Keyed MD5
Authentication, this value is incremented occasionally. For
Meticulous Keyed MD5 Authentication, this value is incremented for
each successive packet transmitted for a session. This provides
protection against replay attacks.
Auth Key/Digest
This field carries the 16-byte MD5 digest for the packet. When
the digest is calculated, the shared MD5 key is stored in this
field, padded to 16 bytes with trailing zero bytes if needed. The
shared key MUST be encoded and configured to section 6.7.3.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
4.4. Keyed SHA1 and Meticulous Keyed SHA1 Authentication Section Format
If the Authentication Present (A) bit is set in the header, and the
Authentication Type field contains 4 (Keyed SHA1) or 5 (Meticulous
Keyed SHA1), the Authentication Section has the following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Auth Type | Auth Len | Auth Key ID | Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Sequence Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Auth Key/Hash... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Auth Type
The Authentication Type, which in this case is 4 (Keyed SHA1) or 5
(Meticulous Keyed SHA1).
Auth Len
The length of the Authentication Section, in bytes. For Keyed
SHA1 and Meticulous Keyed SHA1 authentication, the length is 28.
Auth Key ID
The authentication key ID in use for this packet. This allows
multiple keys to be active simultaneously.
Reserved
This byte MUST be set to zero on transmit and ignored on receipt.
Sequence Number
The sequence number for this packet. For Keyed SHA1
Authentication, this value is incremented occasionally. For
Meticulous Keyed SHA1 Authentication, this value is incremented
for each successive packet transmitted for a session. This
provides protection against replay attacks.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
Auth Key/Hash
This field carries the 20-byte SHA1 hash for the packet. When the
hash is calculated, the shared SHA1 key is stored in this field,
padded to a length of 20 bytes with trailing zero bytes if needed.
The shared key MUST be encoded and configured to section 6.7.4.
5. BFD Echo Packet Format
BFD Echo packets are sent in an encapsulation appropriate to the
environment. See the appropriate application documents for the
specifics of particular environments.
The payload of a BFD Echo packet is a local matter, since only the
sending system ever processes the content. The only requirement is
that sufficient information is included to demultiplex the received
packet to the correct BFD session after it is looped back to the
sender. The contents are otherwise outside the scope of this
specification.
Some form of authentication SHOULD be included, since Echo packets
may be spoofed.
6. Elements of Procedure
This section discusses the normative requirements of the protocol in
order to achieve interoperability. It is important for implementors
to enforce only the requirements specified in this section, as
misguided pedantry has been proven by experience to affect
interoperability adversely.
Remember that all references of the form "bfd.Xx" refer to internal
state variables (defined in section 6.8.1), whereas all references to
"the Xxx field" refer to fields in the protocol packets themselves
(defined in section 4).
6.1. Overview
A system may take either an Active role or a Passive role in session
initialization. A system taking the Active role MUST send BFD
Control packets for a particular session, regardless of whether it
has received any BFD packets for that session. A system taking the
Passive role MUST NOT begin sending BFD packets for a particular
session until it has received a BFD packet for that session, and thus
has learned the remote system's discriminator value. At least one
system MUST take the Active role (possibly both). The role that a
system takes is specific to the application of BFD, and is outside
the scope of this specification.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
A session begins with the periodic, slow transmission of BFD Control
packets. When bidirectional communication is achieved, the BFD
session becomes Up.
Once the BFD session is Up, a system can choose to start the Echo
function if it desires and the other system signals that it will
allow it. The rate of transmission of Control packets is typically
kept low when the Echo function is active.
If the Echo function is not active, the transmission rate of Control
packets may be increased to a level necessary to achieve the
Detection Time requirements for the session.
Once the session is Up, a system may signal that it has entered
Demand mode, and the transmission of BFD Control packets by the
remote system ceases. Other means of implying connectivity are used
to keep the session alive. If either system wishes to verify
bidirectional connectivity, it can initiate a short exchange of BFD
Control packets (a "Poll Sequence"; see section 6.5) to do so.
If Demand mode is not active, and no Control packets are received in
the calculated Detection Time (see section 6.8.4), the session is
declared Down. This is signaled to the remote end via the State
(Sta) field in outgoing packets.
If sufficient Echo packets are lost, the session is declared Down in
the same manner. See section 6.8.5.
If Demand mode is active and no appropriate Control packets are
received in response to a Poll Sequence, the session is declared Down
in the same manner. See section 6.6.
If the session goes Down, the transmission of Echo packets (if any)
ceases, and the transmission of Control packets goes back to the slow
rate.
Once a session has been declared Down, it cannot come back up until
the remote end first signals that it is down (by leaving the Up
state), thus implementing a three-way handshake.
A session MAY be kept administratively down by entering the AdminDown
state and sending an explanatory diagnostic code in the Diagnostic
field.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
6.2. BFD State Machine
The BFD state machine is quite straightforward. There are three
states through which a session normally proceeds: two for
establishing a session (Init and Up) and one for tearing down a
session (Down). This allows a three-way handshake for both session
establishment and session teardown (assuring that both systems are
aware of all session state changes). A fourth state (AdminDown)
exists so that a session can be administratively put down
indefinitely.
Each system communicates its session state in the State (Sta) field
in the BFD Control packet, and that received state, in combination
with the local session state, drives the state machine.
Down state means that the session is down (or has just been created).
A session remains in Down state until the remote system indicates
that it agrees that the session is down by sending a BFD Control
packet with the State field set to anything other than Up. If that
packet signals Down state, the session advances to Init state; if
that packet signals Init state, the session advances to Up state.
Semantically, Down state indicates that the forwarding path is
unavailable, and that appropriate actions should be taken by the
applications monitoring the state of the BFD session. A system MAY
hold a session in Down state indefinitely (by simply refusing to
advance the session state). This may be done for operational or
administrative reasons, among others.
Init state means that the remote system is communicating, and the
local system desires to bring the session up, but the remote system
does not yet realize it. A session will remain in Init state until
either a BFD Control Packet is received that is signaling Init or Up
state (in which case the session advances to Up state) or the
Detection Time expires, meaning that communication with the remote
system has been lost (in which case the session advances to Down
state).
Up state means that the BFD session has successfully been
established, and implies that connectivity between the systems is
working. The session will remain in the Up state until either
connectivity fails or the session is taken down administratively. If
either the remote system signals Down state or the Detection Time
expires, the session advances to Down state.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
AdminDown state means that the session is being held administratively
down. This causes the remote system to enter Down state, and remain
there until the local system exits AdminDown state. AdminDown state
has no semantic implications for the availability of the forwarding
path.
The following diagram provides an overview of the state machine.
Transitions involving AdminDown state are deleted for clarity (but
are fully specified in sections 6.8.6 and 6.8.16). The notation on
each arc represents the state of the remote system (as received in
the State field in the BFD Control packet) or indicates the
expiration of the Detection Timer.
+--+
| | UP, ADMIN DOWN, TIMER
| V
DOWN +------+ INIT
+------------| |------------+
| | DOWN | |
| +-------->| |<--------+ |
| | +------+ | |
| | | |
| | ADMIN DOWN,| |
| |ADMIN DOWN, DOWN,| |
| |TIMER TIMER| |
V | | V
+------+ +------+
+----| | | |----+
DOWN| | INIT |--------------------->| UP | |INIT, UP
+--->| | INIT, UP | |<---+
+------+ +------+
6.3. Demultiplexing and the Discriminator Fields
Since multiple BFD sessions may be running between two systems, there
needs to be a mechanism for demultiplexing received BFD packets to
the proper session.
Each system MUST choose an opaque discriminator value that identifies
each session, and which MUST be unique among all BFD sessions on the
system. The local discriminator is sent in the My Discriminator
field in the BFD Control packet, and is echoed back in the Your
Discriminator field of packets sent from the remote end.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
Once the remote end echoes back the local discriminator, all further
received packets are demultiplexed based on the Your Discriminator
field only (which means that, among other things, the source address
field can change or the interface over which the packets are received
can change, but the packets will still be associated with the proper
session).
The method of demultiplexing the initial packets (in which Your
Discriminator is zero) is application dependent, and is thus outside
the scope of this specification.
Note that it is permissible for a system to change its discriminator
during a session without affecting the session state, since only that
system uses its discriminator for demultiplexing purposes (by having
the other system reflect it back). The implications on an
implementation for changing the discriminator value is outside the
scope of this specification.
6.4. The Echo Function and Asymmetry
The Echo function can be run independently in each direction between
a pair of systems. For whatever reason, a system may advertise that
it is willing to receive (and loop back) Echo packets, but may not
wish to ever send any. The fact that a system is sending Echo
packets is not directly signaled to the system looping them back.
When a system is using the Echo function, it is advantageous to
choose a sedate reception rate for Control packets, since liveness
detection is being handled by the Echo packets. This can be
controlled by manipulating the Required Min RX Interval field (see
section 6.8.3).
If the Echo function is only being run in one direction, the system
not running the Echo function will more likely wish to receive fairly
rapid Control packets in order to achieve its desired Detection Time.
Since BFD allows independent transmission rates in each direction,
this is easily accomplished.
A system SHOULD otherwise advertise the lowest value of Required Min
RX Interval and Required Min Echo RX Interval that it can under the
circumstances, to give the other system more freedom in choosing its
transmission rate. Note that a system is committing to be able to
receive both streams of packets at the rate it advertises, so this
should be taken into account when choosing the values to advertise.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
6.5. The Poll Sequence
A Poll Sequence is an exchange of BFD Control packets that is used in
some circumstances to ensure that the remote system is aware of
parameter changes. It is also used in Demand mode (see section 6.6)
to validate bidirectional connectivity.
A Poll Sequence consists of a system sending periodic BFD Control
packets with the Poll (P) bit set. When the other system receives a
Poll, it immediately transmits a BFD Control packet with the Final
(F) bit set, independent of any periodic BFD Control packets it may
be sending (see section 6.8.7). When the system sending the Poll
sequence receives a packet with Final, the Poll Sequence is
terminated, and any subsequent BFD Control packets are sent with the
Poll bit cleared. A BFD Control packet MUST NOT have both the Poll
(P) and Final (F) bits set.
If periodic BFD Control packets are already being sent (the remote
system is not in Demand mode), the Poll Sequence MUST be performed by
setting the Poll (P) bit on those scheduled periodic transmissions;
additional packets MUST NOT be sent.
After a Poll Sequence is terminated, the system requesting the Poll
Sequence will cease the periodic transmission of BFD Control packets
if the remote end is in Demand mode; otherwise, it will return to the
periodic transmission of BFD Control packets with the Poll (P) bit
clear.
Typically, the entire sequence consists of a single packet in each
direction, though packet losses or relatively long packet latencies
may result in multiple Poll packets to be sent before the sequence
terminates.
6.6. Demand Mode
Demand mode is requested independently in each direction by virtue of
a system setting the Demand (D) bit in its BFD Control packets. The
system receiving the Demand bit ceases the periodic transmission of
BFD Control packets. If both systems are operating in Demand mode,
no periodic BFD Control packets will flow in either direction.
Demand mode requires that some other mechanism is used to imply
continuing connectivity between the two systems. The mechanism used
does not have to be the same in both directions, and is outside of
the scope of this specification. One possible mechanism is the
receipt of traffic from the remote system; another is the use of the
Echo function.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
When a system in Demand mode wishes to verify bidirectional
connectivity, it initiates a Poll Sequence (see section 6.5). If no
response is received to a Poll, the Poll is repeated until the
Detection Time expires, at which point the session is declared to be
Down. Note that if Demand mode is operating only on the local
system, the Poll Sequence is performed by simply setting the Poll (P)
bit in regular periodic BFD Control packets, as required by section
6.5.
The Detection Time in Demand mode is calculated differently than in
Asynchronous mode; it is based on the transmit rate of the local
system, rather than the transmit rate of the remote system. This
ensures that the Poll Sequence mechanism works properly. See section
6.8.4 for more details.
Note that the Poll mechanism will always fail unless the negotiated
Detection Time is greater than the round-trip time between the two
systems. Enforcement of this constraint is outside the scope of this
specification.
Demand mode MAY be enabled or disabled at any time, independently in
each direction, by setting or clearing the Demand (D) bit in the BFD
Control packet, without affecting the BFD session state. Note that
the Demand bit MUST NOT be set unless both systems perceive the
session to be Up (the local system thinks the session is Up, and the
remote system last reported Up state in the State (Sta) field of the
BFD Control packet).
When the transmitted value of the Demand (D) bit is to be changed,
the transmitting system MUST initiate a Poll Sequence in conjunction
with changing the bit in order to ensure that both systems are aware
of the change.
If Demand mode is active on either or both systems, a Poll Sequence
MUST be initiated whenever the contents of the next BFD Control
packet to be sent would be different than the contents of the
previous packet, with the exception of the Poll (P) and Final (F)
bits. This ensures that parameter changes are transmitted to the
remote system and that the remote system acknowledges these changes.
Because the underlying detection mechanism is unspecified, and may
differ between the two systems, the overall Detection Time
characteristics of the path will not be fully known to either system.
The total Detection Time for a particular system is the sum of the
time prior to the initiation of the Poll Sequence, plus the
calculated Detection Time.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
Note that if Demand mode is enabled in only one direction, continuous
bidirectional connectivity verification is lost (only connectivity in
the direction from the system in Demand mode to the other system will
be verified). Resolving the issue of one system requesting Demand
mode while the other requires continuous bidirectional connectivity
verification is outside the scope of this specification.
6.7. Authentication
An optional Authentication Section MAY be present in the BFD Control
packet. In its generic form, the purpose of the Authentication
Section is to carry all necessary information, based on the
authentication type in use, to allow the receiving system to
determine the validity of the received packet. The exact mechanism
depends on the authentication type in use, but in general the
transmitting system will put information in the Authentication
Section that vouches for the packet's validity, and the receiving
system will examine the Authentication Section and either accept the
packet for further processing or discard it.
The same authentication type, and any keys or other necessary
information, obviously must be in use by the two systems. The
negotiation of authentication type, key exchange, etc., are all
outside the scope of this specification and are expected to be
performed by means outside of the protocol.
Note that in the subsections below, to "accept" a packet means only
that the packet has passed authentication; it may in fact be
discarded for other reasons as described in the general packet
reception rules described in section 6.8.6.
Implementations supporting authentication MUST support both types of
SHA1 authentication. Other forms of authentication are optional.
6.7.1. Enabling and Disabling Authentication
It may be desirable to enable or disable authentication on a session
without disturbing the session state. The exact mechanism for doing
so is outside the scope of this specification. However, it is useful
to point out some issues in supporting this mechanism.
In a simple implementation, a BFD session will fail when
authentication is either turned on or turned off, because the packet
acceptance rules essentially require the local and remote machines to
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
do so in a more or less synchronized fashion (within the Detection
Time) -- a packet with authentication will only be accepted if
authentication is "in use" (and likewise packets without
authentication).
One possible approach is to build an implementation such that
authentication is configured, but not considered "in use" until the
first packet containing a matching authentication section is received
(providing the necessary synchronization). Likewise, authentication
could be configured off, but still considered "in use" until the
receipt of the first packet without the authentication section.
In order to avoid security risks, implementations using this method
SHOULD only allow the authentication state to be changed at most once
without some form of intervention (so that authentication cannot be
turned on and off repeatedly simply based on the receipt of BFD
Control packets from remote systems). Unless it is desired to enable
or disable authentication, an implementation SHOULD NOT allow the
authentication state to change based on the receipt of BFD Control
packets.
6.7.2. Simple Password Authentication
The most straightforward (and weakest) form of authentication is
Simple Password Authentication. In this method of authentication,
one or more Passwords (with corresponding Key IDs) are configured in
each system and one of these Password/ID pairs is carried in each BFD
Control packet. The receiving system accepts the packet if the
Password and Key ID matches one of the Password/ID pairs configured
in that system.
Transmission Using Simple Password Authentication
The currently selected password and Key ID for the session MUST be
stored in the Authentication Section of each outgoing BFD Control
packet. The Auth Type field MUST be set to 1 (Simple Password).
The Auth Len field MUST be set to the proper length (4 to 19
bytes).
The password is a binary string, and MUST be 1 to 16 bytes in
length. For interoperability, the management interface by which
the password is configured MUST accept ASCII strings, and SHOULD
also allow for the configuration of any arbitrary binary string in
hexadecimal form. Other configuration methods MAY be supported.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
Reception Using Simple Password Authentication
If the received BFD Control packet does not contain an
Authentication Section, or the Auth Type is not 1 (Simple
Password), then the received packet MUST be discarded.
If the Auth Key ID field does not match the ID of a configured
password, the received packet MUST be discarded.
If the Auth Len field is not equal to the length of the password
selected by the key ID, plus three, the packet MUST be discarded.
If the Password field does not match the password selected by the
key ID, the packet MUST be discarded.
Otherwise, the packet MUST be accepted.
6.7.3. Keyed MD5 and Meticulous Keyed MD5 Authentication
The Keyed MD5 and Meticulous Keyed MD5 Authentication mechanisms are
very similar to those used in other protocols. In these methods of
authentication, one or more secret keys (with corresponding key IDs)
are configured in each system. One of the keys is included in an MD5
[MD5] digest calculated over the outgoing BFD Control packet, but the
Key itself is not carried in the packet. To help avoid replay
attacks, a sequence number is also carried in each packet. For Keyed
MD5, the sequence number is occasionally incremented. For Meticulous
Keyed MD5, the sequence number is incremented on every packet.
The receiving system accepts the packet if the key ID matches one of
the configured Keys, an MD5 digest including the selected key matches
that carried in the packet, and the sequence number is greater than
or equal to the last sequence number received (for Keyed MD5), or
strictly greater than the last sequence number received (for
Meticulous Keyed MD5).
Transmission Using Keyed MD5 and Meticulous Keyed MD5 Authentication
The Auth Type field MUST be set to 2 (Keyed MD5) or 3 (Meticulous
Keyed MD5). The Auth Len field MUST be set to 24. The Auth Key
ID field MUST be set to the ID of the current authentication key.
The Sequence Number field MUST be set to bfd.XmitAuthSeq.
The authentication key value is a binary string of up to 16 bytes,
and MUST be placed into the Auth Key/Digest field, padded with
trailing zero bytes as necessary. For interoperability, the
management interface by which the key is configured MUST accept
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
ASCII strings, and SHOULD also allow for the configuration of any
arbitrary binary string in hexadecimal form. Other configuration
methods MAY be supported.
An MD5 digest MUST be calculated over the entire BFD Control
packet. The resulting digest MUST be stored in the Auth
Key/Digest field prior to transmission (replacing the secret key,
which MUST NOT be carried in the packet).
For Keyed MD5, bfd.XmitAuthSeq MAY be incremented in a circular
fashion (when treated as an unsigned 32-bit value).
bfd.XmitAuthSeq SHOULD be incremented when the session state
changes, or when the transmitted BFD Control packet carries
different contents than the previously transmitted packet. The
decision as to when to increment bfd.XmitAuthSeq is outside the
scope of this specification. See the section titled "Security
Considerations" below for a discussion.
For Meticulous Keyed MD5, bfd.XmitAuthSeq MUST be incremented in a
circular fashion (when treated as an unsigned 32-bit value).
Receipt Using Keyed MD5 and Meticulous Keyed MD5 Authentication
If the received BFD Control packet does not contain an
Authentication Section, or the Auth Type is not correct (2 for
Keyed MD5 or 3 for Meticulous Keyed MD5), then the received packet
MUST be discarded.
If the Auth Key ID field does not match the ID of a configured
authentication key, the received packet MUST be discarded.
If the Auth Len field is not equal to 24, the packet MUST be
discarded.
If bfd.AuthSeqKnown is 1, examine the Sequence Number field. For
Keyed MD5, if the sequence number lies outside of the range of
bfd.RcvAuthSeq to bfd.RcvAuthSeq+(3*Detect Mult) inclusive (when
treated as an unsigned 32-bit circular number space), the received
packet MUST be discarded. For Meticulous Keyed MD5, if the
sequence number lies outside of the range of bfd.RcvAuthSeq+1 to
bfd.RcvAuthSeq+(3*Detect Mult) inclusive (when treated as an
unsigned 32-bit circular number space) the received packet MUST be
discarded.
Otherwise (bfd.AuthSeqKnown is 0), bfd.AuthSeqKnown MUST be set to
1, and bfd.RcvAuthSeq MUST be set to the value of the received
Sequence Number field.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
Replace the contents of the Auth Key/Digest field with the
authentication key selected by the received Auth Key ID field. If
the MD5 digest of the entire BFD Control packet is equal to the
received value of the Auth Key/Digest field, the received packet
MUST be accepted. Otherwise (the digest does not match the Auth
Key/Digest field), the received packet MUST be discarded.
6.7.4. Keyed SHA1 and Meticulous Keyed SHA1 Authentication
The Keyed SHA1 and Meticulous Keyed SHA1 Authentication mechanisms
are very similar to those used in other protocols. In these methods
of authentication, one or more secret keys (with corresponding key
IDs) are configured in each system. One of the keys is included in a
SHA1 [SHA1] hash calculated over the outgoing BFD Control packet, but
the key itself is not carried in the packet. To help avoid replay
attacks, a sequence number is also carried in each packet. For Keyed
SHA1, the sequence number is occasionally incremented. For
Meticulous Keyed SHA1, the sequence number is incremented on every
packet.
The receiving system accepts the packet if the key ID matches one of
the configured keys, a SHA1 hash including the selected key matches
that carried in the packet, and if the sequence number is greater
than or equal to the last sequence number received (for Keyed SHA1),
or strictly greater than the last sequence number received (for
Meticulous Keyed SHA1).
Transmission Using Keyed SHA1 and Meticulous Keyed SHA1
Authentication
The Auth Type field MUST be set to 4 (Keyed SHA1) or 5 (Meticulous
Keyed SHA1). The Auth Len field MUST be set to 28. The Auth Key
ID field MUST be set to the ID of the current authentication key.
The Sequence Number field MUST be set to bfd.XmitAuthSeq.
The authentication key value is a binary string of up to 20 bytes,
and MUST be placed into the Auth Key/Hash field, padding with
trailing zero bytes as necessary. For interoperability, the
management interface by which the key is configured MUST accept
ASCII strings, and SHOULD also allow for the configuration of any
arbitrary binary string in hexadecimal form. Other configuration
methods MAY be supported.
A SHA1 hash MUST be calculated over the entire BFD control packet.
The resulting hash MUST be stored in the Auth Key/Hash field prior
to transmission (replacing the secret key, which MUST NOT be
carried in the packet).
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
For Keyed SHA1, bfd.XmitAuthSeq MAY be incremented in a circular
fashion (when treated as an unsigned 32-bit value).
bfd.XmitAuthSeq SHOULD be incremented when the session state
changes, or when the transmitted BFD Control packet carries
different contents than the previously transmitted packet. The
decision as to when to increment bfd.XmitAuthSeq is outside the
scope of this specification. See the section titled "Security
Considerations" below for a discussion.
For Meticulous Keyed SHA1, bfd.XmitAuthSeq MUST be incremented in
a circular fashion (when treated as an unsigned 32-bit value).
Receipt Using Keyed SHA1 and Meticulous Keyed SHA1 Authentication
If the received BFD Control packet does not contain an
Authentication Section, or the Auth Type is not correct (4 for
Keyed SHA1 or 5 for Meticulous Keyed SHA1), then the received
packet MUST be discarded.
If the Auth Key ID field does not match the ID of a configured
authentication key, the received packet MUST be discarded.
If the Auth Len field is not equal to 28, the packet MUST be
discarded.
If bfd.AuthSeqKnown is 1, examine the Sequence Number field. For
Keyed SHA1, if the sequence number lies outside of the range of
bfd.RcvAuthSeq to bfd.RcvAuthSeq+(3*Detect Mult) inclusive (when
treated as an unsigned 32-bit circular number space), the received
packet MUST be discarded. For Meticulous Keyed SHA1, if the
sequence number lies outside of the range of bfd.RcvAuthSeq+1 to
bfd.RcvAuthSeq+(3*Detect Mult) inclusive (when treated as an
unsigned 32-bit circular number space, the received packet MUST be
discarded.
Otherwise (bfd.AuthSeqKnown is 0), bfd.AuthSeqKnown MUST be set to
1, bfd.RcvAuthSeq MUST be set to the value of the received
Sequence Number field, and the received packet MUST be accepted.
Replace the contents of the Auth Key/Hash field with the
authentication key selected by the received Auth Key ID field. If
the SHA1 hash of the entire BFD Control packet is equal to the
received value of the Auth Key/Hash field, the received packet
MUST be accepted. Otherwise (the hash does not match the Auth
Key/Hash field), the received packet MUST be discarded.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
6.8. Functional Specifics
The following section of this specification is normative. The means
by which this specification is achieved is outside the scope of this
specification.
When a system is said to have "the Echo function active" it means
that the system is sending BFD Echo packets, implying that the
session is Up and the other system has signaled its willingness to
loop back Echo packets.
When the local system is said to have "Demand mode active," it means
that bfd.DemandMode is 1 in the local system (see section 6.8.1), the
session is Up, and the remote system is signaling that the session is
in state Up.
When the remote system is said to have "Demand mode active," it means
that bfd.RemoteDemandMode is 1 (the remote system set the Demand (D)
bit in the last received BFD Control packet), the session is Up, and
the remote system is signaling that the session is in state Up.
6.8.1. State Variables
A minimum amount of information about a session needs to be tracked
in order to achieve the elements of procedure described here. The
following is a set of state variables that are helpful in describing
the mechanisms of BFD. Any means of tracking this state may be used
so long as the protocol behaves as described.
When the text refers to initializing a state variable, this takes
place only at the time that the session (and the corresponding state
variables) is created. The state variables are subsequently
manipulated by the state machine and are never reinitialized, even if
the session fails and is reestablished.
Once session state is created, and at least one BFD Control packet is
received from the remote end, it MUST be preserved for at least one
Detection Time (see section 6.8.4) subsequent to the receipt of the
last BFD Control packet, regardless of the session state. This
preserves timing parameters in case the session flaps. A system MAY
preserve session state longer than this. The preservation or
destruction of session state when no BFD Control packets for this
session have been received from the remote system is outside the
scope of this specification.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 27]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
All state variables in this specification are of the form "bfd.Xx"
and should not be confused with fields carried in the protocol
packets, which are always spelled out to match the names in section
4.
bfd.SessionState
The perceived state of the session (Init, Up, Down, or AdminDown).
The exact action taken when the session state changes is outside
the scope of this specification, though it is expected that this
state change (particularly, to and from Up state) is reported to
other components of the system. This variable MUST be initialized
to Down.
bfd.RemoteSessionState
The session state last reported by the remote system in the State
(Sta) field of the BFD Control packet. This variable MUST be
initialized to Down.
bfd.LocalDiscr
The local discriminator for this BFD session, used to uniquely
identify it. It MUST be unique across all BFD sessions on this
system, and nonzero. It SHOULD be set to a random (but still
unique) value to improve security. The value is otherwise outside
the scope of this specification.
bfd.RemoteDiscr
The remote discriminator for this BFD session. This is the
discriminator chosen by the remote system, and is totally opaque
to the local system. This MUST be initialized to zero. If a
period of a Detection Time passes without the receipt of a valid,
authenticated BFD packet from the remote system, this variable
MUST be set to zero.
bfd.LocalDiag
The diagnostic code specifying the reason for the most recent
change in the local session state. This MUST be initialized to
zero (No Diagnostic).
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 28]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
bfd.DesiredMinTxInterval
The minimum interval, in microseconds, between transmitted BFD
Control packets that this system would like to use at the current
time, less any jitter applied (see section 6.8.2). The actual
interval is negotiated between the two systems. This MUST be
initialized to a value of at least one second (1,000,000
microseconds) according to the rules described in section 6.8.3.
The setting of this variable is otherwise outside the scope of
this specification.
bfd.RequiredMinRxInterval
The minimum interval, in microseconds, between received BFD
Control packets that this system requires, less any jitter applied
by the sender (see section 6.8.2). The setting of this variable
is outside the scope of this specification. A value of zero means
that this system does not want to receive any periodic BFD Control
packets. See section 6.8.18 for details.
bfd.RemoteMinRxInterval
The last value of Required Min RX Interval received from the
remote system in a BFD Control packet. This variable MUST be
initialized to 1.
bfd.DemandMode
Set to 1 if the local system wishes to use Demand mode, or 0 if
not.
bfd.RemoteDemandMode
Set to 1 if the remote system wishes to use Demand mode, or 0 if
not. This is the value of the Demand (D) bit in the last received
BFD Control packet. This variable MUST be initialized to zero.
bfd.DetectMult
The desired Detection Time multiplier for BFD Control packets on
the local system. The negotiated Control packet transmission
interval, multiplied by this variable, will be the Detection Time
for this session (as seen by the remote system). This variable
MUST be a nonzero integer, and is otherwise outside the scope of
this specification. See section 6.8.4 for further information.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 29]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
bfd.AuthType
The authentication type in use for this session, as defined in
section 4.1, or zero if no authentication is in use.
bfd.RcvAuthSeq
A 32-bit unsigned integer containing the last sequence number for
Keyed MD5 or SHA1 Authentication that was received. The initial
value is unimportant.
bfd.XmitAuthSeq
A 32-bit unsigned integer containing the next sequence number for
Keyed MD5 or SHA1 Authentication to be transmitted. This variable
MUST be initialized to a random 32-bit value.
bfd.AuthSeqKnown
Set to 1 if the next sequence number for Keyed MD5 or SHA1
authentication expected to be received is known, or 0 if it is not
known. This variable MUST be initialized to zero.
This variable MUST be set to zero after no packets have been
received on this session for at least twice the Detection Time.
This ensures that the sequence number can be resynchronized if the
remote system restarts.
6.8.2. Timer Negotiation
The time values used to determine BFD packet transmission intervals
and the session Detection Time are continuously negotiated, and thus
may be changed at any time. The negotiation and time values are
independent in each direction for each session.
Each system reports in the BFD Control packet how rapidly it would
like to transmit BFD packets, as well as how rapidly it is prepared
to receive them. This allows either system to unilaterally determine
the maximum packet rate (minimum interval) in both directions.
See section 6.8.7 for the details of packet transmission timing and
negotiation.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 30]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
6.8.3. Timer Manipulation
The time values used to determine BFD packet transmission intervals
and the session Detection Time may be modified at any time without
affecting the state of the session. When the timer parameters are
changed for any reason, the requirements of this section apply.
If either bfd.DesiredMinTxInterval is changed or
bfd.RequiredMinRxInterval is changed, a Poll Sequence MUST be
initiated (see section 6.5). If the timing is such that a system
receiving a Poll Sequence wishes to change the parameters described
in this paragraph, the new parameter values MAY be carried in packets
with the Final (F) bit set, even if the Poll Sequence has not yet
been sent.
If bfd.DesiredMinTxInterval is increased and bfd.SessionState is Up,
the actual transmission interval used MUST NOT change until the Poll
Sequence described above has terminated. This is to ensure that the
remote system updates its Detection Time before the transmission
interval increases.
If bfd.RequiredMinRxInterval is reduced and bfd.SessionState is Up,
the previous value of bfd.RequiredMinRxInterval MUST be used when
calculating the Detection Time for the remote system until the Poll
Sequence described above has terminated. This is to ensure that the
remote system is transmitting packets at the higher rate (and those
packets are being received) prior to the Detection Time being
reduced.
When bfd.SessionState is not Up, the system MUST set
bfd.DesiredMinTxInterval to a value of not less than one second
(1,000,000 microseconds). This is intended to ensure that the
bandwidth consumed by BFD sessions that are not Up is negligible,
particularly in the case where a neighbor may not be running BFD.
If the local system reduces its transmit interval due to
bfd.RemoteMinRxInterval being reduced (the remote system has
advertised a reduced value in Required Min RX Interval), and the
remote system is not in Demand mode, the local system MUST honor the
new interval immediately. In other words, the local system cannot
wait longer than the new interval between the previous packet
transmission and the next one. If this interval has already passed
since the last transmission (because the new interval is
significantly shorter), the local system MUST send the next periodic
BFD Control packet as soon as practicable.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 31]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
When the Echo function is active, a system SHOULD set
bfd.RequiredMinRxInterval to a value of not less than one second
(1,000,000 microseconds). This is intended to keep received BFD
Control traffic at a negligible level, since the actual detection
function is being performed using BFD Echo packets.
In any case other than those explicitly called out above, timing
parameter changes MUST be effected immediately (changing the
transmission rate and/or the Detection Time).
Note that the Poll Sequence mechanism is ambiguous if more than one
parameter change is made that would require its use, and those
multiple changes are spread across multiple packets (since the
semantics of the returning Final are unclear). Therefore, if
multiple changes are made that require the use of a Poll Sequence,
there are three choices: 1) they MUST be communicated in a single BFD
Control packet (so the semantics of the Final reply are clear), or 2)
sufficient time must have transpired since the Poll Sequence was
completed to disambiguate the situation (at least a round trip time
since the last Poll was transmitted) prior to the initiation of
another Poll Sequence, or 3) an additional BFD Control packet with
the Final (F) bit *clear* MUST be received after the Poll Sequence
has completed prior to the initiation of another Poll Sequence (this
option is not available when Demand mode is active).
6.8.4. Calculating the Detection Time
The Detection Time (the period of time without receiving BFD packets
after which the session is determined to have failed) is not carried
explicitly in the protocol. Rather, it is calculated independently
in each direction by the receiving system based on the negotiated
transmit interval and the detection multiplier. Note that there may
be different Detection Times in each direction.
The calculation of the Detection Time is slightly different when in
Demand mode versus Asynchronous mode.
In Asynchronous mode, the Detection Time calculated in the local
system is equal to the value of Detect Mult received from the remote
system, multiplied by the agreed transmit interval of the remote
system (the greater of bfd.RequiredMinRxInterval and the last
received Desired Min TX Interval). The Detect Mult value is (roughly
speaking, due to jitter) the number of packets that have to be missed
in a row to declare the session to be down.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 32]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
If Demand mode is not active, and a period of time equal to the
Detection Time passes without receiving a BFD Control packet from the
remote system, and bfd.SessionState is Init or Up, the session has
gone down -- the local system MUST set bfd.SessionState to Down and
bfd.LocalDiag to 1 (Control Detection Time Expired).
In Demand mode, the Detection Time calculated in the local system is
equal to bfd.DetectMult, multiplied by the agreed transmit interval
of the local system (the greater of bfd.DesiredMinTxInterval and
bfd.RemoteMinRxInterval). bfd.DetectMult is (roughly speaking, due
to jitter) the number of packets that have to be missed in a row to
declare the session to be down.
If Demand mode is active, and a period of time equal to the Detection
Time passes after the initiation of a Poll Sequence (the transmission
of the first BFD Control packet with the Poll bit set), the session
has gone down -- the local system MUST set bfd.SessionState to Down,
and bfd.LocalDiag to 1 (Control Detection Time Expired).
(Note that a packet is considered to have been received, for the
purposes of Detection Time expiration, only if it has not been
"discarded" according to the rules of section 6.8.6).
6.8.5. Detecting Failures with the Echo Function
When the Echo function is active and a sufficient number of Echo
packets have not arrived as they should, the session has gone down --
the local system MUST set bfd.SessionState to Down and bfd.LocalDiag
to 2 (Echo Function Failed).
The means by which the Echo function failures are detected is outside
of the scope of this specification. Any means that will detect a
communication failure are acceptable.
6.8.6. Reception of BFD Control Packets
When a BFD Control packet is received, the following procedure MUST
be followed, in the order specified. If the packet is discarded
according to these rules, processing of the packet MUST cease at that
point.
If the version number is not correct (1), the packet MUST be
discarded.
If the Length field is less than the minimum correct value (24 if
the A bit is clear, or 26 if the A bit is set), the packet MUST be
discarded.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 33]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
If the Length field is greater than the payload of the
encapsulating protocol, the packet MUST be discarded.
If the Detect Mult field is zero, the packet MUST be discarded.
If the Multipoint (M) bit is nonzero, the packet MUST be
discarded.
If the My Discriminator field is zero, the packet MUST be
discarded.
If the Your Discriminator field is nonzero, it MUST be used to
select the session with which this BFD packet is associated. If
no session is found, the packet MUST be discarded.
If the Your Discriminator field is zero and the State field is not
Down or AdminDown, the packet MUST be discarded.
If the Your Discriminator field is zero, the session MUST be
selected based on some combination of other fields, possibly
including source addressing information, the My Discriminator
field, and the interface over which the packet was received. The
exact method of selection is application specific and is thus
outside the scope of this specification. If a matching session is
not found, a new session MAY be created, or the packet MAY be
discarded. This choice is outside the scope of this
specification.
If the A bit is set and no authentication is in use (bfd.AuthType
is zero), the packet MUST be discarded.
If the A bit is clear and authentication is in use (bfd.AuthType
is nonzero), the packet MUST be discarded.
If the A bit is set, the packet MUST be authenticated under the
rules of section 6.7, based on the authentication type in use
(bfd.AuthType). This may cause the packet to be discarded.
Set bfd.RemoteDiscr to the value of My Discriminator.
Set bfd.RemoteState to the value of the State (Sta) field.
Set bfd.RemoteDemandMode to the value of the Demand (D) bit.
Set bfd.RemoteMinRxInterval to the value of Required Min RX
Interval.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 34]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
If the Required Min Echo RX Interval field is zero, the
transmission of Echo packets, if any, MUST cease.
If a Poll Sequence is being transmitted by the local system and
the Final (F) bit in the received packet is set, the Poll Sequence
MUST be terminated.
Update the transmit interval as described in section 6.8.2.
Update the Detection Time as described in section 6.8.4.
If bfd.SessionState is AdminDown
Discard the packet
If received state is AdminDown
If bfd.SessionState is not Down
Set bfd.LocalDiag to 3 (Neighbor signaled
session down)
Set bfd.SessionState to Down
Else
If bfd.SessionState is Down
If received State is Down
Set bfd.SessionState to Init
Else if received State is Init
Set bfd.SessionState to Up
Else if bfd.SessionState is Init
If received State is Init or Up
Set bfd.SessionState to Up
Else (bfd.SessionState is Up)
If received State is Down
Set bfd.LocalDiag to 3 (Neighbor signaled
session down)
Set bfd.SessionState to Down
Check to see if Demand mode should become active or not (see
section 6.6).
If bfd.RemoteDemandMode is 1, bfd.SessionState is Up, and
bfd.RemoteSessionState is Up, Demand mode is active on the remote
system and the local system MUST cease the periodic transmission
of BFD Control packets (see section 6.8.7).
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 35]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
If bfd.RemoteDemandMode is 0, or bfd.SessionState is not Up, or
bfd.RemoteSessionState is not Up, Demand mode is not active on the
remote system and the local system MUST send periodic BFD Control
packets (see section 6.8.7).
If the Poll (P) bit is set, send a BFD Control packet to the
remote system with the Poll (P) bit clear, and the Final (F) bit
set (see section 6.8.7).
If the packet was not discarded, it has been received for purposes
of the Detection Time expiration rules in section 6.8.4.
6.8.7. Transmitting BFD Control Packets
With the exceptions listed in the remainder of this section, a system
MUST NOT transmit BFD Control packets at an interval less than the
larger of bfd.DesiredMinTxInterval and bfd.RemoteMinRxInterval, less
applied jitter (see below). In other words, the system reporting the
slower rate determines the transmission rate.
The periodic transmission of BFD Control packets MUST be jittered on
a per-packet basis by up to 25%, that is, the interval MUST be
reduced by a random value of 0 to 25%, in order to avoid self-
synchronization with other systems on the same subnetwork. Thus, the
average interval between packets will be roughly 12.5% less than that
negotiated.
If bfd.DetectMult is equal to 1, the interval between transmitted BFD
Control packets MUST be no more than 90% of the negotiated
transmission interval, and MUST be no less than 75% of the negotiated
transmission interval. This is to ensure that, on the remote system,
the calculated Detection Time does not pass prior to the receipt of
the next BFD Control packet.
The transmit interval MUST be recalculated whenever
bfd.DesiredMinTxInterval changes, or whenever bfd.RemoteMinRxInterval
changes, and is equal to the greater of those two values. See
sections 6.8.2 and 6.8.3 for details on transmit timers.
A system MUST NOT transmit BFD Control packets if bfd.RemoteDiscr is
zero and the system is taking the Passive role.
A system MUST NOT periodically transmit BFD Control packets if
bfd.RemoteMinRxInterval is zero.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 36]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
A system MUST NOT periodically transmit BFD Control packets if Demand
mode is active on the remote system (bfd.RemoteDemandMode is 1,
bfd.SessionState is Up, and bfd.RemoteSessionState is Up) and a Poll
Sequence is not being transmitted.
If a BFD Control packet is received with the Poll (P) bit set to 1,
the receiving system MUST transmit a BFD Control packet with the Poll
(P) bit clear and the Final (F) bit set as soon as practicable,
without respect to the transmission timer or any other transmission
limitations, without respect to the session state, and without
respect to whether Demand mode is active on either system. A system
MAY limit the rate at which such packets are transmitted. If rate
limiting is in effect, the advertised value of Desired Min TX
Interval MUST be greater than or equal to the interval between
transmitted packets imposed by the rate limiting function.
A system MUST NOT set the Demand (D) bit unless bfd.DemandMode is 1,
bfd.SessionState is Up, and bfd.RemoteSessionState is Up.
A BFD Control packet SHOULD be transmitted during the interval
between periodic Control packet transmissions when the contents of
that packet would differ from that in the previously transmitted
packet (other than the Poll and Final bits) in order to more rapidly
communicate a change in state.
The contents of transmitted BFD Control packets MUST be set as
follows:
Version
Set to the current version number (1).
Diagnostic (Diag)
Set to bfd.LocalDiag.
State (Sta)
Set to the value indicated by bfd.SessionState.
Poll (P)
Set to 1 if the local system is sending a Poll Sequence, or 0 if
not.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 37]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
Final (F)
Set to 1 if the local system is responding to a Control packet
received with the Poll (P) bit set, or 0 if not.
Control Plane Independent (C)
Set to 1 if the local system's BFD implementation is independent
of the control plane (it can continue to function through a
disruption of the control plane).
Authentication Present (A)
Set to 1 if authentication is in use on this session (bfd.AuthType
is nonzero), or 0 if not.
Demand (D)
Set to bfd.DemandMode if bfd.SessionState is Up and
bfd.RemoteSessionState is Up. Otherwise, it is set to 0.
Multipoint (M)
Set to 0.
Detect Mult
Set to bfd.DetectMult.
Length
Set to the appropriate length, based on the fixed header length
(24) plus any Authentication Section.
My Discriminator
Set to bfd.LocalDiscr.
Your Discriminator
Set to bfd.RemoteDiscr.
Desired Min TX Interval
Set to bfd.DesiredMinTxInterval.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 38]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
Required Min RX Interval
Set to bfd.RequiredMinRxInterval.
Required Min Echo RX Interval
Set to the minimum required Echo packet receive interval for this
session. If this field is set to zero, the local system is
unwilling or unable to loop back BFD Echo packets to the remote
system, and the remote system will not send Echo packets.
Authentication Section
Included and set according to the rules in section 6.7 if
authentication is in use (bfd.AuthType is nonzero). Otherwise,
this section is not present.
6.8.8. Reception of BFD Echo Packets
A received BFD Echo packet MUST be demultiplexed to the appropriate
session for processing. A means of detecting missing Echo packets
MUST be implemented, which most likely involves processing of the
Echo packets that are received. The processing of received Echo
packets is otherwise outside the scope of this specification.
6.8.9. Transmission of BFD Echo Packets
BFD Echo packets MUST NOT be transmitted when bfd.SessionState is not
Up. BFD Echo packets MUST NOT be transmitted unless the last BFD
Control packet received from the remote system contains a nonzero
value in Required Min Echo RX Interval.
BFD Echo packets MAY be transmitted when bfd.SessionState is Up. The
interval between transmitted BFD Echo packets MUST NOT be less than
the value advertised by the remote system in Required Min Echo RX
Interval, except as follows:
A 25% jitter MAY be applied to the rate of transmission, such that
the actual interval MAY be between 75% and 100% of the advertised
value. A single BFD Echo packet MAY be transmitted between
normally scheduled Echo transmission intervals.
The transmission of BFD Echo packets is otherwise outside the scope
of this specification.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 39]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
6.8.10. Min Rx Interval Change
When it is desired to change the rate at which BFD Control packets
arrive from the remote system, bfd.RequiredMinRxInterval can be
changed at any time to any value. The new value will be transmitted
in the next outgoing Control packet, and the remote system will
adjust accordingly. See section 6.8.3 for further requirements.
6.8.11. Min Tx Interval Change
When it is desired to change the rate at which BFD Control packets
are transmitted to the remote system (subject to the requirements of
the neighboring system), bfd.DesiredMinTxInterval can be changed at
any time to any value. The rules in section 6.8.3 apply.
6.8.12. Detect Multiplier Change
When it is desired to change the detect multiplier, the value of
bfd.DetectMult can be changed to any nonzero value. The new value
will be transmitted with the next BFD Control packet, and the use of
a Poll Sequence is not necessary. See section 6.6 for additional
requirements.
6.8.13. Enabling or Disabling The Echo Function
If it is desired to start or stop the transmission of BFD Echo
packets, this MAY be done at any time (subject to the transmission
requirements detailed in section 6.8.9).
If it is desired to enable or disable the looping back of received
BFD Echo packets, this MAY be done at any time by changing the value
of Required Min Echo RX Interval to zero or nonzero in outgoing BFD
Control packets.
6.8.14. Enabling or Disabling Demand Mode
If it is desired to start or stop Demand mode, this MAY be done at
any time by setting bfd.DemandMode to the proper value. Demand mode
will subsequently become active under the rules described in section
6.6.
If Demand mode is no longer active on the remote system, the local
system MUST begin transmitting periodic BFD Control packets as
described in section 6.8.7.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 40]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
6.8.15. Forwarding Plane Reset
When the forwarding plane in the local system is reset for some
reason, such that the remote system can no longer rely on the local
forwarding state, the local system MUST set bfd.LocalDiag to 4
(Forwarding Plane Reset), and set bfd.SessionState to Down.
6.8.16. Administrative Control
There may be circumstances where it is desirable to administratively
enable or disable a BFD session. When this is desired, the following
procedure MUST be followed:
If enabling session
Set bfd.SessionState to Down
Else
Set bfd.SessionState to AdminDown
Set bfd.LocalDiag to an appropriate value
Cease the transmission of BFD Echo packets
If signaling is received from outside BFD that the underlying path
has failed, an implementation MAY administratively disable the
session with the diagnostic Path Down.
Other scenarios MAY use the diagnostic Administratively Down.
BFD Control packets SHOULD be transmitted for at least a Detection
Time after transitioning to AdminDown state in order to ensure that
the remote system is aware of the state change. BFD Control packets
MAY be transmitted indefinitely after transitioning to AdminDown
state in order to maintain session state in each system (see section
6.8.18 below).
6.8.17. Concatenated Paths
If the path being monitored by BFD is concatenated with other paths
(connected end-to-end in series), it may be desirable to propagate
the indication of a failure of one of those paths across the BFD
session (providing an interworking function for liveness monitoring
between BFD and other technologies).
Two diagnostic codes are defined for this purpose: Concatenated Path
Down and Reverse Concatenated Path Down. The first propagates
forward path failures (in which the concatenated path fails in the
direction toward the interworking system), and the second propagates
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 41]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
reverse path failures (in which the concatenated path fails in the
direction away from the interworking system, assuming a bidirectional
link).
A system MAY signal one of these failure states by simply setting
bfd.LocalDiag to the appropriate diagnostic code. Note that the BFD
session is not taken down. If Demand mode is not active on the
remote system, no other action is necessary, as the diagnostic code
will be carried via the periodic transmission of BFD Control packets.
If Demand mode is active on the remote system (the local system is
not transmitting periodic BFD Control packets), a Poll Sequence MUST
be initiated to ensure that the diagnostic code is transmitted. Note
that if the BFD session subsequently fails, the diagnostic code will
be overwritten with a code detailing the cause of the failure. It is
up to the interworking agent to perform the above procedure again,
once the BFD session reaches Up state, if the propagation of the
concatenated path failure is to resume.
6.8.18. Holding Down Sessions
A system MAY choose to prevent a BFD session from being established.
One possible reason might be to manage the rate at which sessions are
established. This can be done by holding the session in Down or
AdminDown state, as appropriate.
There are two related mechanisms that are available to help with this
task. First, a system is REQUIRED to maintain session state
(including timing parameters), even when a session is down, until a
Detection Time has passed without the receipt of any BFD Control
packets. This means that a system may take down a session and
transmit an arbitrarily large value in the Required Min RX Interval
field to control the rate at which it receives packets.
Additionally, a system MAY transmit a value of zero for Required Min
RX Interval to indicate that the remote system should send no packets
whatsoever.
So long as the local system continues to transmit BFD Control
packets, the remote system is obligated to obey the value carried in
Required Min RX Interval. If the remote system does not receive any
BFD Control packets for a Detection Time, it SHOULD reset
bfd.RemoteMinRxInterval to its initial value of 1 (per section 6.8.1,
since it is no longer required to maintain previous session state)
and then can transmit at its own rate.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 42]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
7. Operational Considerations
BFD is likely to be deployed as a critical part of network
infrastructure. As such, care should be taken to avoid disruption.
Obviously, any mechanism that blocks BFD packets, such as firewalls
or other policy processes, will cause BFD to fail.
Mechanisms that control packet scheduling, such as policers, traffic
shapers, priority queueing, etc., have the potential of impacting BFD
operations if the Detection Time is similar in scale to the scheduled
packet transmit or receive rate. The delivery of BFD packets is
time-critical, relative to the magnitude of the Detection Time, so
this may need to be taken into account in implementation and
deployment, particularly when very short Detection Times are to be
used.
When BFD is used across multiple hops, a congestion control mechanism
MUST be implemented, and when congestion is detected, the BFD
implementation MUST reduce the amount of traffic it generates. The
exact mechanism used is outside the scope of this specification, and
the requirements of this mechanism may differ depending on how BFD is
deployed, and how it interacts with other parts of the system (for
example, exponential backoff may not be appropriate in cases where
routing protocols are interacting closely with BFD).
Note that "congestion" is not only a traffic phenomenon, but also a
computational one. It is possible for systems with a large number of
BFD sessions and/or very short packet intervals to become CPU-bound.
As such, a congestion control algorithm SHOULD be used even across
single hops in order to avoid the possibility of catastrophic system
collapse, as such failures have been seen repeatedly in other
periodic Hello-based protocols.
The mechanisms for detecting congestion are outside the scope of this
specification, but may include the detection of lost BFD Control
packets (by virtue of holes in the authentication sequence number
space, or by BFD session failure) or other means.
The mechanisms for reducing BFD's traffic load are the control of the
local and remote packet transmission rate via the Min RX Interval and
Min TX Interval fields.
Note that any mechanism that increases the transmit or receive
intervals will increase the Detection Time for the session.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 43]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
It is worth noting that a single BFD session does not consume a large
amount of bandwidth. An aggressive session that achieves a detection
time of 50 milliseconds, by using a transmit interval of 16.7
milliseconds and a detect multiplier of 3, will generate 60 packets
per second. The maximum length of each packet on the wire is on the
order of 100 bytes, for a total of around 48 kilobits per second of
bandwidth consumption in each direction.
8. IANA Considerations
This document defines two registries administered by IANA. The first
is titled "BFD Diagnostic Codes" (see section 4.1). Initial values
for the BFD Diagnostic Code registry are given below. Further
assignments are to be made through Expert Review
[IANA-CONSIDERATIONS]. Assignments consist of a BFD Diagnostic Code
name and its associated value.
Value BFD Diagnostic Code Name
----- ------------------------
0 No Diagnostic
1 Control Detection Time Expired
2 Echo Function Failed
3 Neighbor Signaled Session Down
4 Forwarding Plane Reset
5 Path Down
6 Concatenated Path Down
7 Administratively Down
8 Reverse Concatenated Path Down
9-31 Unassigned
The second registry is titled "BFD Authentication Types" (see section
4.1). Initial values for the BFD Authentication Type registry are
given below. Further assignments are to be made through Expert
Review [IANA-CONSIDERATIONS]. Assignments consist of a BFD
Authentication Type Code name and its associated value.
Value BFD Authentication Type Name
----- ----------------------------
0 Reserved
1 Simple Password
2 Keyed MD5
3 Meticulous Keyed MD5
4 Keyed SHA1
5 Meticulous Keyed SHA1
6-255 Unassigned
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 44]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
9. Security Considerations
As BFD may be tied into the stability of the network infrastructure
(such as routing protocols), the effects of an attack on a BFD
session may be very serious: a link may be falsely declared to be
down, or falsely declared to be up; in either case, the effect is
denial of service.
An attacker who is in complete control of the link between the
systems can easily drop all BFD packets but forward everything else
(causing the link to be falsely declared down), or forward only the
BFD packets but nothing else (causing the link to be falsely declared
up). This attack cannot be prevented by BFD.
To mitigate threats from less capable attackers, BFD specifies two
mechanisms to prevent spoofing of BFD Control packets. The
Generalized TTL Security Mechanism [GTSM] uses the time to live (TTL)
or Hop Count to prevent off-link attackers from spoofing packets.
The Authentication Section authenticates the BFD Control packets.
These mechanisms are described in more detail below.
When a BFD session is directly connected across a single link
(physical, or a secure tunnel such as IPsec), the TTL or Hop Count
MUST be set to the maximum on transmit, and checked to be equal to
the maximum value on reception (and the packet dropped if this is not
the case). See [GTSM] for more information on this technique. If
BFD is run across multiple hops or an insecure tunnel (such as
Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)), the Authentication Section
SHOULD be utilized.
The level of security provided by the Authentication Section varies
based on the authentication type used. Simple Password
authentication is obviously only as secure as the secrecy of the
passwords used, and should be considered only if the BFD session is
guaranteed to be run over an infrastructure not subject to packet
interception. Its chief advantage is that it minimizes the
computational effort required for authentication.
Keyed MD5 Authentication is much stronger than Simple Password
Authentication since the keys cannot be discerned by intercepting
packets. It is vulnerable to replay attacks in between increments of
the sequence number. The sequence number can be incremented as
seldom (or as often) as desired, trading off resistance to replay
attacks with the computational effort required for authentication.
Meticulous Keyed MD5 authentication is stronger yet, as it requires
the sequence number to be incremented for every packet. Replay
attack vulnerability is reduced due to the requirement that the
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 45]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
sequence number must be incremented on every packet, the window size
of acceptable packets is small, and the initial sequence number is
randomized. There is still a window of attack at the beginning of
the session while the sequence number is being determined. This
authentication scheme requires an MD5 calculation on every packet
transmitted and received.
Using SHA1 is believed to have stronger security properties than MD5.
All comments about MD5 in this section also apply to SHA1.
Both Keyed MD5/SHA1 and Meticulous Keyed MD5/SHA1 use the "secret
suffix" construction (also called "append only") in which the shared
secret key is appended to the data before calculating the hash,
instead of the more common Hashed Message Authentication Code (HMAC)
construction [HMAC]. This construction is believed to be appropriate
for BFD, but designers of any additional authentication mechanisms
for BFD are encouraged to read [HMAC] and its references.
If both systems randomize their Local Discriminator values at the
beginning of a session, replay attacks may be further mitigated,
regardless of the authentication type in use. Since the Local
Discriminator may be changed at any time during a session, this
mechanism may also help mitigate attacks.
The security implications of the use of BFD Echo packets are
dependent on how those packets are defined, since their structure is
local to the transmitting system and outside the scope of this
specification. However, since Echo packets are defined and processed
only by the transmitting system, the use of cryptographic
authentication does not guarantee that the other system is actually
alive; an attacker could loop the Echo packets back (without knowing
any secret keys) and cause the link to be falsely declared to be up.
This can be mitigated by using a suitable interval for BFD Control
packets. [GTSM] could be applied to BFD Echo packets, though the
TTL/Hop Count will be decremented by 1 in the course of echoing the
packet, so spoofing is possible from one hop away.
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[GTSM] Gill, V., Heasley, J., Meyer, D., Savola, P., Ed., and C.
Pignataro, "The Generalized TTL Security Mechanism
(GTSM)", RFC 5082, October 2007.
[KEYWORDS] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 46]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
[MD5] Rivest, R., "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm", RFC 1321,
April 1992.
[SHA1] Eastlake 3rd, D. and P. Jones, "US Secure Hash Algorithm 1
(SHA1)", RFC 3174, September 2001.
10.2. Informative References
[HMAC] Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M., and R. Canetti, "HMAC: Keyed-
Hashing for Message Authentication", RFC 2104, February
1997.
[IANA-CONSIDERATIONS]
Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
May 2008.
[OSPF] Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2", STD 54, RFC 2328, April 1998.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 47]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
Appendix A. Backward Compatibility (Non-Normative)
Although version 0 of this protocol (as defined in early versions of
the Internet-Draft that became this RFC) is unlikely to have been
deployed widely, some implementors may wish to have a backward
compatibility mechanism. Note that any mechanism may be potentially
used that does not alter the protocol definition, so interoperability
should not be an issue.
The suggested mechanism described here has the property that it will
converge on version 1 if both systems implement it, even if one
system is upgraded from version 0 within a Detection Time. It will
interoperate with a system that implements only one version (or is
configured to support only one version). A system should obviously
not perform this function if it is configured to or is only capable
of using a single version.
A BFD session will enter a "negotiation holddown" if it is configured
for automatic versioning and either has just started up, or the
session has been manually cleared. The session is set to AdminDown
state and version 1. During the holddown period, which lasts for one
Detection Time, the system sends BFD Control packets as usual, but
ignores received packets. After the holddown time is complete, the
state transitions to Down and normal operation resumes.
When a system is not in holddown, if it doing automatic versioning
and is currently using version 1, if any version 0 packet is received
for the session, it switches immediately to version 0. If it is
currently using version 0 and a version 1 packet is received that
indicates that the neighbor is in state AdminDown, it switches to
version 1. If using version 0 and a version 1 packet is received
indicating a state other than AdminDown, the packet is ignored (per
spec).
If the version being used is changed, the session goes down as
appropriate for the new version (Down state for version 1 or Failing
state for version 0).
Appendix B. Contributors
Kireeti Kompella and Yakov Rekhter of Juniper Networks were also
significant contributors to this document.
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 48]
RFC 5880 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection June 2010
Appendix C. Acknowledgments
This document was inspired by (and is intended to replace) the
Protocol Liveness Protocol document, written by Kireeti Kompella.
Demand mode was inspired by "A Traffic-Based Method of Detecting Dead
Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Peers", by G. Huang, et al.
The authors would also like to thank Mike Shand, John Scudder,
Stewart Bryant, Pekka Savola, Richard Spencer, and Pasi Eronen for
their substantive input.
The authors would also like to thank Owen Wheeler for hosting
teleconferences between the authors of this specification and
multiple vendors in order address implementation and clarity issues.
Authors' Addresses
Dave Katz
Juniper Networks
1194 N. Mathilda Ave.
Sunnyvale, CA 94089-1206
USA
Phone: +1-408-745-2000
EMail: dkatz@juniper.net
Dave Ward
Juniper Networks
1194 N. Mathilda Ave.
Sunnyvale, CA 94089-1206
USA
Phone: +1-408-745-2000
EMail: dward@juniper.net
Katz & Ward Standards Track [Page 49]