Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Extension for IPv6
RFC 6156
| Document | Type |
RFC
- Proposed Standard
(April 2011)
Obsoleted by RFC 8656
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Gonzalo Camarillo , Simon Perreault , Oscar Novo | ||
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | RFC 6156 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | David Harrington | ||
| IESG note | Dan Wing (dwing@cisco.com) is the document shepherd. | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
RFC 6156
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) G. Camarillo
Request for Comments: 6156 O. Novo
Category: Standards Track Ericsson
ISSN: 2070-1721 S. Perreault, Ed.
Viagenie
April 2011
Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Extension for IPv6
Abstract
This document adds IPv6 support to Traversal Using Relays around NAT
(TURN). IPv6 support in TURN includes IPv4-to-IPv6, IPv6-to-IPv6,
and IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying. This document defines the REQUESTED-
ADDRESS-FAMILY attribute for TURN. The REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY
attribute allows a client to explicitly request the address type the
TURN server will allocate (e.g., an IPv4-only node may request the
TURN server to allocate an IPv6 address).
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6156.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Camarillo, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 6156 TURN Extension for IPv4/IPv6 Transition April 2011
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Overview of Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Creating an Allocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1. Sending an Allocate Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1.1. The REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY Attribute . . . . . . . . 4
4.2. Receiving an Allocate Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.2.1. Unsupported Address Family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.3. Receiving an Allocate Error Response . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. Refreshing an Allocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5.1. Sending a Refresh Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5.2. Receiving a Refresh Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. CreatePermission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6.1. Sending a CreatePermission Request . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6.2. Receiving a CreatePermission Request . . . . . . . . . . . 7
6.2.1. Peer Address Family Mismatch . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. Channels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7.1. Sending a ChannelBind Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7.2. Receiving a ChannelBind Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8. Packet Translations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8.1. IPv4-to-IPv6 Translations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8.2. IPv6-to-IPv6 Translations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
8.3. IPv6-to-IPv4 Translations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
9. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
9.1. Tunnel Amplification Attack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
10. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
10.1. New STUN Attribute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
10.2. New STUN Error Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
11. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
12. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
12.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
12.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Camarillo, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 6156 TURN Extension for IPv4/IPv6 Transition April 2011
1. Introduction
Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) [RFC5766] is a protocol that
allows for an element behind a NAT to receive incoming data over UDP
or TCP. It is most useful for elements behind NATs without Endpoint-
Independent Mapping [RFC4787] that wish to be on the receiving end of
a connection to a single peer.
The base specification of TURN [RFC5766] only defines IPv4-to-IPv4
relaying. This document adds IPv6 support to TURN, which includes
IPv4-to-IPv6, IPv6-to-IPv6, and IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying. This document
defines the REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY attribute, which is an extension
to TURN that allows a client to explicitly request the address type
the TURN server will allocate (e.g., an IPv4-only node may request
the TURN server to allocate an IPv6 address). This document also
defines and registers new error response codes.
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
3. Overview of Operation
When a user wishes a TURN server to allocate an address of a specific
type, it sends an Allocate request to the TURN server with a
REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY attribute. TURN can run over UDP and TCP,
and it allows for a client to request address/port pairs for
receiving both UDP and TCP.
After the request has been successfully authenticated, the TURN
server allocates a transport address of the type indicated in the
REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY attribute. This address is called the
relayed transport address.
The TURN server returns the relayed transport address in the response
to the Allocate request. This response contains an XOR-RELAYED-
ADDRESS attribute indicating the IP address and port that the server
allocated for the client.
TURN servers allocate a single relayed transport address per
allocation request. Therefore, Allocate requests cannot carry more
than one REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY attribute. Consequently, a client
that wishes to allocate more than one relayed transport address at a
TURN server (e.g., an IPv4 and an IPv6 address) needs to perform
several allocation requests (one allocation request per relayed
transport address).
Camarillo, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 6156 TURN Extension for IPv4/IPv6 Transition April 2011
A TURN server that supports a set of address families is assumed to
be able to relay packets between them. If a server does not support
the address family requested by a client, the server returns a 440
(Address Family not Supported) error response.
4. Creating an Allocation
The behavior specified here affects the processing defined in Section
6 of [RFC5766].
4.1. Sending an Allocate Request
A client that wishes to obtain a relayed transport address of a
specific address type includes a REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY attribute,
which is defined in Section 4.1.1, in the Allocate request that it
sends to the TURN server. Clients MUST NOT include more than one
REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY attribute in an Allocate request. The
mechanisms to formulate an Allocate request are described in Section
6.1 of [RFC5766].
Clients MUST NOT include a REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY attribute in an
Allocate request that contains a RESERVATION-TOKEN attribute.
4.1.1. The REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY Attribute
The REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY attribute is used by clients to request
the allocation of a specific address type from a server. The
following is the format of the REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY attribute.
Note that TURN attributes are TLV (Type-Length-Value) encoded, with a
16-bit type, a 16-bit length, and a variable-length value.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Family | Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: Format of REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY Attribute
Type: the type of the REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY attribute is 0x0017.
As specified in [RFC5389], attributes with values between 0x0000
and 0x7FFF are comprehension-required, which means that the client
or server cannot successfully process the message unless it
understands the attribute.
Camarillo, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 6156 TURN Extension for IPv4/IPv6 Transition April 2011
Length: this 16-bit field contains the length of the attribute in
bytes. The length of this attribute is 4 bytes.
Family: there are two values defined for this field and specified in
[RFC5389], Section 15.1: 0x01 for IPv4 addresses and 0x02 for IPv6
addresses.
Reserved: at this point, the 24 bits in the Reserved field MUST be
set to zero by the client and MUST be ignored by the server.
The REQUEST-ADDRESS-TYPE attribute MAY only be present in Allocate
requests.
4.2. Receiving an Allocate Request
Once a server has verified that the request is authenticated and has
not been tampered with, the TURN server processes the Allocate
request. If it contains both a RESERVATION-TOKEN and a REQUESTED-
ADDRESS-FAMILY, the server replies with a 400 (Bad Request) Allocate
error response. Following the rules in [RFC5389], if the server does
not understand the REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY attribute, it generates
an Allocate error response, which includes an ERROR-CODE attribute
with 420 (Unknown Attribute) response code. This response will
contain an UNKNOWN-ATTRIBUTE attribute listing the unknown REQUESTED-
ADDRESS-FAMILY attribute.
If the server can successfully process the request, it allocates a
transport address for the TURN client, called the relayed transport
address, and returns it in the response to the Allocate request.
As specified in [RFC5766], the Allocate response contains the same
transaction ID contained in the Allocate request, and the XOR-
RELAYED-ADDRESS attribute is set to the relayed transport address.
The XOR-RELAYED-ADDRESS attribute indicates the allocated IP address
and port. It is encoded in the same way as the XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS
[RFC5389].
If the REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY attribute is absent, the server MUST
allocate an IPv4-relayed transport address for the TURN client. If
allocation of IPv4 addresses is disabled by local policy, the server
returns a 440 (Address Family not Supported) Allocate error response.
If the server does not support the address family requested by the
client, it MUST generate an Allocate error response, and it MUST
include an ERROR-CODE attribute with the 440 (Address Family not
Supported) response code, which is defined in Section 4.2.1.
Camarillo, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 6156 TURN Extension for IPv4/IPv6 Transition April 2011
4.2.1. Unsupported Address Family
This document defines the following new error response code:
440 (Address Family not Supported): The server does not support the
address family requested by the client.
4.3. Receiving an Allocate Error Response
If the client receives an Allocate error response with the 440
(Unsupported Address Family) error code, the client MUST NOT retry
its request.
5. Refreshing an Allocation
The behavior specified here affects the processing defined in Section
7 of [RFC5766].
5.1. Sending a Refresh Request
To perform an allocation refresh, the client generates a Refresh
Request as described in Section 7.1 of [RFC5766]. The client MUST
NOT include any REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY attribute in its Refresh
Request.
5.2. Receiving a Refresh Request
If a server receives a Refresh Request with a REQUESTED-ADDRESS-
FAMILY attribute, and the attribute's value doesn't match the address
family of the allocation, the server MUST reply with a 443 (Peer
Address Family Mismatch) Refresh error response.
6. CreatePermission
The behavior specified here affects the processing defined in Section
9 of [RFC5766].
6.1. Sending a CreatePermission Request
The client MUST only include XOR-PEER-ADDRESS attributes with
addresses of the same address family as that of the relayed transport
address for the allocation.
Camarillo, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 6156 TURN Extension for IPv4/IPv6 Transition April 2011
6.2. Receiving a CreatePermission Request
If an XOR-PEER-ADDRESS attribute contains an address of an address
family different than that of the relayed transport address for the
allocation, the server MUST generate an error response with the 443
(Peer Address Family Mismatch) response code, which is defined in
Section 6.2.1.
6.2.1. Peer Address Family Mismatch
This document defines the following new error response code:
443 (Peer Address Family Mismatch): A peer address was of a
different address family than that of the relayed transport
address of the allocation.
7. Channels
The behavior specified here affects the processing defined in Section
11 of [RFC5766].
7.1. Sending a ChannelBind Request
The client MUST only include an XOR-PEER-ADDRESS attribute with an
address of the same address family as that of the relayed transport
address for the allocation.
7.2. Receiving a ChannelBind Request
If the XOR-PEER-ADDRESS attribute contains an address of an address
family different than that of the relayed transport address for the
allocation, the server MUST generate an error response with the 443
(Peer Address Family Mismatch) response code, which is defined in
Section 6.2.1.
8. Packet Translations
The TURN specification [RFC5766] describes how TURN relays should
relay traffic consisting of IPv4 packets (i.e., IPv4-to-IPv4
translations). The relay translates the IP addresses and port
numbers of the packets based on the allocation's state data. How to
translate other header fields is also specified in [RFC5766]. This
document addresses IPv4-to-IPv6, IPv6-to-IPv4, and IPv6-to-IPv6
translations.
Camarillo, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 6156 TURN Extension for IPv4/IPv6 Transition April 2011
TURN relays performing any translation MUST translate the IP
addresses and port numbers of the packets based on the allocation's
state information as specified in [RFC5766]. The following sections
specify how to translate other header fields.
As discussed in Section 2.6 of [RFC5766], translations in TURN are
designed so that a TURN server can be implemented as an application
that runs in "user-land" under commonly available operating systems
and that does not require special privileges. The translations
specified in the following sections follow this principle.
The descriptions below have two parts: a preferred behavior and an
alternate behavior. The server SHOULD implement the preferred
behavior. Otherwise, the server MUST implement the alternate
behavior and MUST NOT do anything else.
8.1. IPv4-to-IPv6 Translations
Traffic Class
Preferred behavior: as specified in Section 4 of [RFC6145].
Alternate behavior: the relay sets the Traffic Class to the
default value for outgoing packets.
Flow Label
Preferred behavior: the relay sets the Flow label to 0. The relay
can choose to set the Flow label to a different value if it
supports the IPv6 Flow Label field [RFC3697].
Alternate behavior: the relay sets the Flow label to the default
value for outgoing packets.
Hop Limit
Preferred behavior: as specified in Section 4 of [RFC6145].
Alternate behavior: the relay sets the Hop Limit to the default
value for outgoing packets.
Fragmentation
Preferred behavior: as specified in Section 4 of [RFC6145].
Alternate behavior: the relay assembles incoming fragments. The
relay follows its default behavior to send outgoing packets.
Camarillo, et al. Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 6156 TURN Extension for IPv4/IPv6 Transition April 2011
For both preferred and alternate behavior, the DONT-FRAGMENT
attribute ([RFC5766], Section 14.8) MUST be ignored by the server.
Extension Headers
Preferred behavior: the relay sends the outgoing packet without
any IPv6 extension headers, with the exception of the Fragment
Header as described above.
Alternate behavior: same as preferred.
8.2. IPv6-to-IPv6 Translations
Flow Label
The relay should consider that it is handling two different IPv6
flows. Therefore, the Flow label [RFC3697] SHOULD NOT be copied
as part of the translation.
Preferred behavior: the relay sets the Flow label to 0. The relay
can choose to set the Flow label to a different value if it
supports the IPv6 Flow Label field [RFC3697].
Alternate behavior: the relay sets the Flow label to the default
value for outgoing packets.
Hop Limit
Preferred behavior: the relay acts as a regular router with
respect to decrementing the Hop Limit and generating an ICMPv6
error if it reaches zero.
Alternate behavior: the relay sets the Hop Limit to the default
value for outgoing packets.
Fragmentation
Preferred behavior: if the incoming packet did not include a
Fragment Header and the outgoing packet size does not exceed the
outgoing link's MTU, the relay sends the outgoing packet without a
Fragment Header.
If the incoming packet did not include a Fragment Header and the
outgoing packet size exceeds the outgoing link's MTU, the relay
drops the outgoing packet and sends an ICMP message of Type 2,
Code 0 ("Packet too big") to the sender of the incoming packet.
Camarillo, et al. Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 6156 TURN Extension for IPv4/IPv6 Transition April 2011
If the packet is being sent to the peer, the relay reduces the MTU
reported in the ICMP message by 48 bytes to allow room for the
overhead of a Data indication.
If the incoming packet included a Fragment Header and the outgoing
packet size (with a Fragment Header included) does not exceed the
outgoing link's MTU, the relay sends the outgoing packet with a
Fragment Header. The relay sets the fields of the Fragment Header
as appropriate for a packet originating from the server.
If the incoming packet included a Fragment Header and the outgoing
packet size exceeds the outgoing link's MTU, the relay MUST
fragment the outgoing packet into fragments of no more than 1280
bytes. The relay sets the fields of the Fragment Header as
appropriate for a packet originating from the server.
Alternate behavior: the relay assembles incoming fragments. The
relay follows its default behavior to send outgoing packets.
For both preferred and alternate behavior, the DONT-FRAGMENT
attribute MUST be ignored by the server.
Extension Headers
Preferred behavior: the relay sends the outgoing packet without
any IPv6 extension headers, with the exception of the Fragment
Header as described above.
Alternate behavior: same as preferred.
8.3. IPv6-to-IPv4 Translations
Type of Service and Precedence
Preferred behavior: as specified in Section 5 of [RFC6145].
Alternate behavior: the relay sets the Type of Service and
Precedence to the default value for outgoing packets.
Time to Live
Preferred behavior: as specified in Section 5 of [RFC6145].
Alternate behavior: the relay sets the Time to Live to the default
value for outgoing packets.
Camarillo, et al. Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 6156 TURN Extension for IPv4/IPv6 Transition April 2011
Fragmentation
Preferred behavior: as specified in Section 5 of [RFC6145].
Additionally, when the outgoing packet's size exceeds the outgoing
link's MTU, the relay needs to generate an ICMP error (ICMPv6
Packet Too Big) reporting the MTU size. If the packet is being
sent to the peer, the relay SHOULD reduce the MTU reported in the
ICMP message by 48 bytes to allow room for the overhead of a Data
indication.
Alternate behavior: the relay assembles incoming fragments. The
relay follows its default behavior to send outgoing packets.
For both preferred and alternate behavior, the DONT-FRAGMENT
attribute MUST be ignored by the server.
9. Security Considerations
Translation between IPv4 and IPv6 creates a new way for clients to
obtain IPv4 or IPv6 access that they did not have before. For
example, an IPv4-only client having access to a TURN server
implementing this specification is now able to access the IPv6
Internet. This needs to be considered when establishing security and
monitoring policies.
The loop attack described in [RFC5766], Section 17.1.7, may be more
easily done in cases where address spoofing is easier to accomplish
over IPv6. Mitigation of this attack over IPv6 is the same as for
IPv4.
All the security considerations applicable to STUN [RFC5389] and TURN
[RFC5766] are applicable to this document as well.
9.1. Tunnel Amplification Attack
An attacker might attempt to cause data packets to loop numerous
times between a TURN server and a tunnel between IPv4 and IPv6. The
attack goes as follows.
Suppose an attacker knows that a tunnel endpoint will forward
encapsulated packets from a given IPv6 address (this doesn't
necessarily need to be the tunnel endpoint's address). Suppose he
then spoofs these two packets from this address:
1. An Allocate request asking for a v4 address, and
2. A ChannelBind request establishing a channel to the IPv4 address
of the tunnel endpoint
Camarillo, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 6156 TURN Extension for IPv4/IPv6 Transition April 2011
Then he has set up an amplification attack:
o The TURN relay will re-encapsulate IPv6 UDP data in v4 and send it
to the tunnel endpoint.
o The tunnel endpoint will decapsulate packets from the v4 interface
and send them to v6.
So, if the attacker sends a packet of the following form:
IPv6: src=2001:db9::1 dst=2001:db8::2
UDP: <ports>
TURN: <channel id>
IPv6: src=2001:db9::1 dst=2001:db8::2
UDP: <ports>
TURN: <channel id>
IPv6: src=2001:db9::1 dst=2001:db8::2
UDP: <ports>
TURN: <channel id>
...
Then the TURN relay and the tunnel endpoint will send it back and
forth until the last TURN header is consumed, at which point the TURN
relay will send an empty packet that the tunnel endpoint will drop.
The amplification potential here is limited by the MTU, so it's not
huge: IPv6+UDP+TURN takes 334 bytes, so you could get a four-to-one
amplification out of a 1500-byte packet. But the attacker could
still increase traffic volume by sending multiple packets or by
establishing multiple channels spoofed from different addresses
behind the same tunnel endpoint.
The attack is mitigated as follows. It is RECOMMENDED that TURN
relays not accept allocation or channel binding requests from
addresses known to be tunneled, and that they not forward data to
such addresses. In particular, a TURN relay MUST NOT accept Teredo
or 6to4 addresses in these requests.
10. IANA Considerations
IANA registered the following values under the "STUN Attributes"
registry and under the "STUN Error Codes" registry.
10.1. New STUN Attribute
0x0017: REQUESTED-ADDRESS-FAMILY
Camarillo, et al. Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 6156 TURN Extension for IPv4/IPv6 Transition April 2011
10.2. New STUN Error Codes
440 Address Family not Supported
443 Peer Address Family Mismatch
11. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Alfred E. Heggestad, Dan Wing, Magnus
Westerlund, Marc Petit-Huguenin, Philip Matthews, and Remi Denis-
Courmont for their feedback on this document.
12. References
12.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3697] Rajahalme, J., Conta, A., Carpenter, B., and S. Deering,
"IPv6 Flow Label Specification", RFC 3697, March 2004.
[RFC5389] Rosenberg, J., Mahy, R., Matthews, P., and D. Wing,
"Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)", RFC 5389,
October 2008.
[RFC5766] Mahy, R., Matthews, P., and J. Rosenberg, "Traversal Using
Relays around NAT (TURN): Relay Extensions to Session
Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)", RFC 5766, April 2010.
[RFC6145] Li, X., Bao, C., and F. Baker, "IP/ICMP Translation
Algorithm", RFC 6145, April 2011.
12.2. Informative References
[RFC4787] Audet, F. and C. Jennings, "Network Address Translation
(NAT) Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP", BCP 127,
RFC 4787, January 2007.
Camarillo, et al. Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 6156 TURN Extension for IPv4/IPv6 Transition April 2011
Authors' Addresses
Gonzalo Camarillo
Ericsson
Hirsalantie 11
Jorvas 02420
Finland
EMail: Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com
Oscar Novo
Ericsson
Hirsalantie 11
Jorvas 02420
Finland
EMail: Oscar.Novo@ericsson.com
Simon Perreault (editor)
Viagenie
2600 boul. Laurier, suite D2-630
Quebec, QC G1V 2M2
Canada
Phone: +1 418 656 9254
EMail: simon.perreault@viagenie.ca
URI: http://www.viagenie.ca
Camarillo, et al. Standards Track [Page 14]