Cloud Data Management Interface (CDMI) Media Types
RFC 6208
| Document | Type |
RFC - Informational
(April 2011; No errata)
Was draft-cdmi-mediatypes (individual in app area)
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Krishna Sankar , Arnold Jones | ||
| Last updated | 2018-12-20 | ||
| Stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | plain text html pdf htmlized bibtex | ||
| Reviews | |||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||
| IESG | IESG state | RFC 6208 (Informational) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | Peter Saint-Andre | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) K. Sankar, Ed.
Request for Comments: 6208 Cisco
Category: Informational A. Jones
ISSN: 2070-1721 SNIA
April 2011
Cloud Data Management Interface (CDMI) Media Types
Abstract
This document describes several Internet media types defined for the
Cloud Data Management Interface (CDMI) by the Storage Networking
Industry Association (SNIA). The media types are:
o application/cdmi-object
o application/cdmi-container
o application/cdmi-domain
o application/cdmi-capability
o application/cdmi-queue
Status of This Memo
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for informational purposes.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents
approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet
Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6208.
Sankar & Jones Informational [Page 1]
RFC 6208 CDMI Media Types April 2011
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................3
1.1. Requirements Language ......................................3
2. Cloud Data Management Domain and Its Relevance ..................3
3. Processing Guidelines ...........................................4
3.1. Media Type: application/cdmi-object ........................4
3.2. Media Type: application/cdmi-container .....................4
3.3. Media Type: application/cdmi-domain ........................5
3.4. Media Type: application/cdmi-capability ....................5
3.5. Media Type: application/cdmi-queue .........................5
4. Transport Considerations ........................................6
5. IANA Considerations .............................................6
5.1. Media Type: application/cdmi-object ........................6
5.2. Media Type: application/cdmi-container .....................7
5.3. Media Type: application/cdmi-domain ........................8
5.4. Media Type: application/cdmi-capability ....................9
5.5. Media Type: application/cdmi-queue ........................10
6. Security Considerations ........................................11
6.1. Confidentiality and Integrity .............................11
6.2. Access Control ............................................11
6.3. Audit .....................................................12
6.4. JSON Security Considerations ..............................12
6.5. Executable/Active Content .................................12
7. Acknowledgements ...............................................12
8. References .....................................................12
8.1. Normative References ......................................12
8.2. Informative References ....................................13
Sankar & Jones Informational [Page 2]
RFC 6208 CDMI Media Types April 2011
1. Introduction
The Cloud Data Management Interface (CDMI) [CDMI-1], developed by the
Storage Networking Industry Association (SNIA), is the functional
interface that applications will use to create, retrieve, update, and
delete data elements from the cloud. As part of this interface, the
client will be able to discover the capabilities of the cloud storage
offering and use this interface to manage containers and the data
that is placed in them. In addition, metadata can be set on
containers and their contained data elements through this interface.
1.1. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
2. Cloud Data Management Domain and Its Relevance
A storage cloud is a storage service hosted either on premise or off
premise, across a network. An important part of the cloud model, in
general, is the concept of a pool of resources that are drawn from,
on demand, in small increments (smaller than what one would typically
purchase by buying equipment). By abstracting data storage behind a
set of service interfaces and delivering it on demand, a wide range
of actual offerings and implementations are possible. The only type
of storage that is excluded from this definition is that which is
delivered based on fixed capacity increments rather than on demand.
The CDMI defines a set of functional interfaces (data paths) and
management interfaces (control paths) to create, retrieve, update,
and delete data elements from a storage cloud. Another important
concept in this standard is that of metadata. When managing large
amounts of data with differing requirements, metadata is a convenient
mechanism to express those requirements in such a way that underlying
data services can differentiate their treatment of the data to meet
those requirements. CDMI also defines an extensible metadata system
for storage clouds.
As part of the CDMI interface, the client will be able to discover
the capabilities of the cloud storage offering and to use this
interface to manage containers and the data that is placed in them.
In addition, system metadata can be added to containers and their
contained data elements through this interface.
Sankar & Jones Informational [Page 3]
RFC 6208 CDMI Media Types April 2011
The hierarchy that CDMI defines is as follows:
o The basic element of storage is an object.
o Objects are stored in a container hierarchy.
o CDMI also defines an object, called a queue, which has special
properties for in-order, first-in, first-out creation and fetching
of queue objects, similar to a container of data objects.
o A cloud offering can also support domains, which allow
administrative ownership to be associated with stored objects.
Domains can also be hierarchical, allowing for corporate domains
with multiple children domains for departments or individuals.
The domain concept is also used to map Access Control Lists (ACLs)
to principals as well as to aggregate usage data that is used to
bill, meter, and monitor cloud usage. (Note: The CDMI "domain"
defined here is not a DNS domain name as specified in [RFC1076]
and [RFC1024]).
o Finally, a capabilities resource and associated URI [RFC3986]
allows a client to discover the capabilities of the offering and
its implementation of CDMI.
3. Processing Guidelines
This section summarizes the processing of each media type. This
document provides only the essential information. The CDMI
specification [CDMI-1], which has more details and appropriate
examples, is the final authority on the processing aspects.
3.1. Media Type: application/cdmi-object
A CDMI object is the basic storage element in a CDMI system and is
analogous to a file within a filesystem. The object is represented
in the CDMI interface in JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) format
[RFC4627]. (See the JSON web site at [JSON-1] for general
information about JSON). Each data object has a set of well-defined
fields that includes a single value and optional metadata. The
implementations are free to store the data in any form they choose,
but the application/cdmi-object SHOULD be represented in the CDMI
interface as defined in Section 8 of the CDMI specification [CDMI-1].
3.2. Media Type: application/cdmi-container
A container object is the fundamental grouping of stored data within
CDMI and is analogous to a directory within a filesystem. Each
container has zero or more child objects and a set of well-defined
Sankar & Jones Informational [Page 4]
RFC 6208 CDMI Media Types April 2011
fields that includes standardized and custom metadata. A container
can include other containers similar to sub-directories in a
filesystem. The implementations are free to represent the container
in any form they choose, but the application/cdmi-container SHOULD be
represented in the CDMI interface as defined in Section 9 of the CDMI
specification [CDMI-1].
3.3. Media Type: application/cdmi-domain
Domain objects represent the concept of administrative ownership of
stored data within a CDMI storage system. A CDMI offering may
include a hierarchy of domains that provide access to domain-related
information within a CDMI context. This domain hierarchy is a series
of CDMI objects that correspond to parent and child domains, with
each domain corresponding to logical groupings of objects that are to
be managed together. Section 10 of the CDMI specification [CDMI-1]
details the information content, representation, and processing of
domain objects.
3.4. Media Type: application/cdmi-capability
Capability objects form a special class of container objects that
allows a CDMI client to discover what subset of the CDMI standard is
implemented by a CDMI provider. For each URI in a CDMI system, the
set of interactions that the system is capable of performing against
that URI is described by the presence of named "capabilities". Each
capability present for a given URI indicates what functionality the
cloud storage system will allow against that URI. Capabilities are
always static. Section 12 of the CDMI specification [CDMI-1] details
the representation and processing of capability objects.
3.5. Media Type: application/cdmi-queue
Queues are a special class of container object and are used to
provide first-in, first-out access when storing and retrieving data.
A queue writer PUTs objects in the queue, and a queue reader GETs
objects from the queue, acknowledging the receipt of the last object
that it received. Queuing provides a simple mechanism for one or
more writers to send data to a single reader in a reliable way. If
queues are supported by the cloud storage system, cloud clients
create the queue objects by using the same mechanism used to create
data objects. Section 11 of the CDMI specification [CDMI-1] details
the operations and processing of queue objects.
Sankar & Jones Informational [Page 5]
RFC 6208 CDMI Media Types April 2011
4. Transport Considerations
The CDMI operates over HTTP [RFC2616] and does not make sense outside
the HTTP realm. We do not expect the CDMI to operate over other
protocols nor to use a transport protocol, such as TCP [RFC793],
directly.
5. IANA Considerations
IANA has registered the following media types:
o application/cdmi-object
o application/cdmi-container
o application/cdmi-domain
o application/cdmi-capability
o application/cdmi-queue
5.1. Media Type: application/cdmi-object
Type name: application
Subtype name: cdmi-object
Required parameters: none
Optional parameters: none
Encoding considerations: Assumes that the representation is always
UTF-8 as defined in [RFC3629] and 8bit as defined in [RFC4288]
Security considerations: See Section 6 of RFC 6208
Interoperability considerations: none
Published specification: RFC 6208
Applications that use this media type: Implementations of the Cloud
Data Management Interface (CDMI) defined by the Storage Networking
Industry Association (SNIA)
Sankar & Jones Informational [Page 6]
RFC 6208 CDMI Media Types April 2011
Additional information:
Magic number(s): n/a
File extension(s): .cdmio
Macintosh file type code(s): TEXT
Person and email address to contact for further information:
Arnold Jones, arnold.jones@snia.org
Intended usage: COMMON
Restrictions on usage: none
Author: SNIA Cloud Storage Initiative, cloudtwg@snia.org
Change controller: SNIA Cloud Storage Initiative, cloudtwg@snia.org
5.2. Media Type: application/cdmi-container
Type name: application
Subtype name: cdmi-container
Required parameters: none
Optional parameters: none
Encoding considerations: Assumes that the representation is always
UTF-8 as defined in [RFC3629] and 8bit as defined in [RFC4288]
Security considerations: See Section 6 of RFC 6208
Interoperability considerations: none
Published specification: RFC 6208
Applications that use this media type: Implementations of the Cloud
Data Management Interface (CDMI) defined by the Storage Networking
Industry Association (SNIA)
Sankar & Jones Informational [Page 7]
RFC 6208 CDMI Media Types April 2011
Additional information:
Magic number(s): n/a
File extension(s): .cdmic
Macintosh file type code(s): TEXT
Person and email address to contact for further information:
Arnold Jones, arnold.jones@snia.org
Intended usage: COMMON
Restrictions on usage: none
Author: SNIA Cloud Storage Initiative, cloudtwg@snia.org
Change controller: SNIA Cloud Storage Initiative, cloudtwg@snia.org
5.3. Media Type: application/cdmi-domain
Type name: application
Subtype name: cdmi-domain
Required parameters: none
Optional parameters: none
Encoding considerations: Assumes that the representation is always
UTF-8 as defined in [RFC3629] and 8bit as defined in [RFC4288]
Security considerations: See Section 6 of RFC 6208
Interoperability considerations: none
Published specification: RFC 6208
Applications that use this media type: Implementations of the Cloud
Data Management Interface (CDMI) defined by the Storage Networking
Industry Association (SNIA)
Sankar & Jones Informational [Page 8]
RFC 6208 CDMI Media Types April 2011
Additional information:
Magic number(s): n/a
File extension(s): .cdmid
Macintosh file type code(s): TEXT
Person and email address to contact for further information:
Arnold Jones, arnold.jones@snia.org
Intended usage: COMMON
Restrictions on usage: none
Author: SNIA Cloud Storage Initiative, cloudtwg@snia.org
Change controller: SNIA Cloud Storage Initiative, cloudtwg@snia.org
5.4. Media Type: application/cdmi-capability
Type name: application
Subtype name: cdmi-capability
Required parameters: none
Optional parameters: none
Encoding considerations: Assumes that the representation is always
UTF-8 as defined in [RFC3629] and 8bit as defined in [RFC4288]
Security considerations: See Section 6 of RFC 6208
Interoperability considerations: none
Published specification: RFC 6208
Applications that use this media type: Implementations of the Cloud
Data Management Interface (CDMI) defined by the Storage Networking
Industry Association (SNIA)
Sankar & Jones Informational [Page 9]
RFC 6208 CDMI Media Types April 2011
Additional information:
Magic number(s): n/a
File extension(s): .cdmia
Macintosh file type code(s): TEXT
Person and email address to contact for further information:
Arnold Jones, arnold.jones@snia.org
Intended usage: COMMON
Restrictions on usage: none
Author: SNIA Cloud Storage Initiative, cloudtwg@snia.org
Change controller: SNIA Cloud Storage Initiative, cloudtwg@snia.org
5.5. Media Type: application/cdmi-queue
Type name: application
Subtype name: cdmi-queue
Required parameters: none
Optional parameters: none
Encoding considerations: Assumes that the representation is always
UTF-8 as defined in [RFC3629] and 8bit as defined in [RFC4288]
Security considerations: See Section 6 of RFC 6208
Interoperability considerations: none
Published specification: RFC 6208
Applications that use this media type: Implementations of the Cloud
Data Management Interface (CDMI) defined by the Storage Networking
Industry Association (SNIA)
Sankar & Jones Informational [Page 10]
RFC 6208 CDMI Media Types April 2011
Additional information:
Magic number(s): n/a
File extension(s): .cdmiq
Macintosh file type code(s): TEXT
Person and email address to contact for further information:
Arnold Jones, arnold.jones@snia.org
Intended usage: COMMON
Restrictions on usage: none
Author: SNIA Cloud Storage Initiative, cloudtwg@snia.org
Change controller: SNIA Cloud Storage Initiative, cloudtwg@snia.org
6. Security Considerations
This section was developed with RFC 3552 [RFC3552] as a guide. CDMI
is an application interface and the relevant security considerations
include confidentiality, integrity, access control, and audit.
Transport and endpoint security artifacts like Distributed Denial of
Service (DDoS) are orthogonal, and domains like non-repudiation are
left to the application that employs this interface.
6.1. Confidentiality and Integrity
The confidentiality and integrity of the CDMI exchanges are
determined by the application that uses the interface. CDMI does not
contain any specific mechanisms and relies on transport mechanisms
such as Transport Layer Security (TLS) (see [RFC2818]) for
confidentiality and integrity of the messages across the network.
6.2. Access Control
The access control of the CDMI endpoint URLs are beyond this
specification. If required, applications should use appropriate URL
authentication and authorization techniques, such as URI routers for
different classes of users and restrict access based on URI origin.
For fine-grained control of the CDMI objects, the CDMI specification
[CDMI-1] contains the Access Control Lists (ACLs) and Access Control
Entries (ACEs). These are described fully in Section 16.1 of the
CDMI specification [CDMI-1].
Sankar & Jones Informational [Page 11]
RFC 6208 CDMI Media Types April 2011
6.3. Audit
The CDMI specification [CDMI-1] has defined a set of metadata fields,
as explained in Section 16.3, to facilitate the incorporation of
access and other audit markers. The CDMI metadata system is
extensible, and the implementations can add more metadata as required
by the security posture of the domain.
6.4. JSON Security Considerations
JSON-related security considerations, described in RFC 4627
[RFC4627], apply.
6.5. Executable/Active Content
The CDMI interface does not include any directives for active
content.
7. Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the guidance and wisdom of Mark
Carlson and Peter Saint-Andre, comments from Patrick Faltstrom, and
all the insightful discussions and ideas of the SNIA CDMI Cloud
Technical Work Group.
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[CDMI-1] SNIA, "Cloud Data Management Interface Version 1.0", 2010,
<http://www.snia.org/tech_activities/standards/
curr_standards/cdmi>.
[JSON-1] JSON, "Introducing JSON", 2006, <http://www.json.org>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2616] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H.,
Masinter, L., Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext
Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999.
[RFC3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, November 2003.
[RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC
3986, January 2005.
Sankar & Jones Informational [Page 12]
RFC 6208 CDMI Media Types April 2011
[RFC4288] Freed, N. and J. Klensin, "Media Type Specifications and
Registration Procedures", BCP 13, RFC 4288, December 2005.
[RFC4627] Crockford, D., "The application/json Media Type for
JavaScript Object Notation (JSON)", RFC 4627, July 2006.
8.2. Informative References
[RFC793] Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7, RFC
793, September 1981.
[RFC1024] Partridge, C. and G. Trewitt, "HEMS variable definitions",
RFC 1024, October 1987.
[RFC1076] Trewitt, G. and C. Partridge, "HEMS monitoring and control
language", RFC 1076, November 1988.
[RFC2818] Rescorla, E., "HTTP Over TLS", RFC 2818, May 2000.
[RFC3552] Rescorla, E. and B. Korver, "Guidelines for Writing RFC
Text on Security Considerations", BCP 72, RFC 3552, July
2003.
Authors' Addresses
Krishna Sankar (editor)
Cisco
170 W. Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA 95134
USA
Phone: (408) 853 8475
EMail: ksankar@cisco.com
Arnold Jones
SNIA
4410 ArrowsWest Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80907
USA
Phone: (407) 574 7273
EMail: arnold.jones@snia.org
Sankar & Jones Informational [Page 13]