Design and Application Spaces for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs)
RFC 6568

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2017-05-16
10 (System) Changed document authors from "Eunsook Kim, Dominik Kaspar, Nicolas Chevrollier, JP Vasseur" to "Eunsook Kim, Dominik Kaspar, JP Vasseur"
2016-11-30
10 (System) Closed request for Last Call review by TSVDIR with state 'Unknown'
2015-10-14
10 (System) Notify list changed from 6lowpan-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Adrian Farrel
2012-04-30
10 (System) RFC published
2012-01-26
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2012-01-25
10 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2012-01-24
10 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2012-01-24
10 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-01-24
10 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-01-24
10 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2012-01-24
10 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2012-01-24
10 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-12-19
10 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-12-19
10 Ralph Droms Ballot writeup text changed
2011-08-10
10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Thank you for addressing my Discuss with some more substantive Security text both in the Security Considertions section and splattered through the document.
2011-08-10
10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2011-07-26
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-07-26
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-10.txt
2011-03-26
10 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-26
10 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
In 3.5.1, the telematics example has a deployment parameter of "scattered, pre-
planned".  Somehow these seem in conflict.

I share ...
2011-03-26
10 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
I'm picking up Tim's discuss position.

The Security Considerations overlooks a number of very important
issues/challenges raised by the use ...
2011-03-26
10 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to Discuss from No Objection
2011-03-03
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Donald Eastlake.
2011-03-03
10 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-03-03
10 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-03-03
10 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-03
10 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-03
10 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
Some comments from Ari Keränen:

One question/comment:

3.6.2.  6LoWPAN Applicability

  Communication schedules must be set up between
  ...
2011-03-03
10 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-03
10 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-03
10 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
I support Tim's discussion.
2011-03-03
10 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-02
10 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
In 3.5.1, the telematics example has a deployment parameter of "scattered, pre-planned".  Somehow these seem in conflict.

I share Lars ...
2011-03-02
10 Tim Polk [Ballot comment]
In 3.5.1, the telematics example has a deployment parameter of "scattered, pre-planned".  Somehow these seem in conflict.
2011-03-02
10 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
The Security Considerations overlooks a number of very important issues/challenges raised by the use cases.

First, a number of the use cases ...
2011-03-02
10 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-03-02
10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-02
10 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
A splendid and useful document that is let down by the Security
Considerations section.

The applicability of 6LowPANs is significantly dependent on suitable ...
2011-03-02
10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-03-02
10 Robert Sparks [Ballot comment]
Consider clarifying whether the set of dimensions here is intended as a complete list, or is just an important set currently identified.
2011-03-02
10 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-02
10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
An interesting and well written document.

I agree with Peter that RFC2119 language does not seem appropriate.
2011-03-02
10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-01
10 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
This is a pleasant document. However, given that it discusses use cases and deployment scenarios, I doubt that it needs to use RFC ...
2011-03-01
10 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-01
10 Ralph Droms State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-03-01
10 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
I have a pretty fundamental issue with this document. Many of the described use cases make requirements on the 6lowpan architecture that I ...
2011-03-01
10 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-03-01
10 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-02-28
10 Amanda Baber We understand that this document does not require any IANA actions.
2011-02-24
10 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR is assigned to Nandita Dukkipati
2011-02-16
10 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2011-02-16
10 Ralph Droms Ballot has been issued
2011-02-16
10 Ralph Droms Created "Approve" ballot
2011-02-16
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Donald Eastlake
2011-02-15
10 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-02-15
10 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To ...
2011-02-15
10 Ralph Droms Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-03-03
2011-02-15
10 Ralph Droms Status Date has been changed to 2011-02-15 from None
2011-02-15
10 Ralph Droms Last Call was requested
2011-02-15
10 Ralph Droms State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation.
2011-02-15
10 Ralph Droms Last Call text changed
2011-02-15
10 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-02-15
10 (System) Last call text was added
2011-02-15
10 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-01-18
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-09.txt
2011-01-13
10 Ralph Droms Ballot writeup text changed
2010-11-15
10 Ralph Droms State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2010-11-09
10 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Geoff Mulligan (geoff.ietf@mulligan.com)is the document shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-11-09
10 Cindy Morgan
  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the ...
2010-11-09
10 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2010-11-09
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-08.txt
2010-11-08
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-07.txt
2010-07-28
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-06.txt
2010-05-13
10 (System) Document has expired
2009-11-09
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-05.txt
2009-10-01
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-04.txt
2009-07-09
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-03.txt
2009-03-09
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-02.txt
2008-11-03
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-01.txt
2008-10-17
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-00.txt