MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection to Match the Operational Expectations of Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, Optical Transport Network, and Ethernet Transport Network Operators
RFC 7271
Document | Type |
RFC - Proposed Standard
(June 2014; No errata)
Updated by RFC 8234
Updates RFC 6378
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Jeong-dong Ryoo , Eric Gray , Huub van Helvoort , Alessandro D'Alessandro , Tae-sik Cheung , Eric Osborne | ||
Last updated | 2018-12-20 | ||
Replaces | draft-ryoogray-mpls-tp-psc-itu | ||
Stream | IETF | ||
Formats | plain text html pdf htmlized bibtex | ||
Reviews | |||
Stream | WG state | Submitted to IESG for Publication | |
Document shepherd | Loa Andersson | ||
Shepherd write-up | Show (last changed 2014-02-09) | ||
IESG | IESG state | RFC 7271 (Proposed Standard) | |
Consensus Boilerplate | Yes | ||
Telechat date | |||
Responsible AD | Adrian Farrel | ||
Send notices to | (None) | ||
IANA | IANA review state | Version Changed - Review Needed | |
IANA action state | RFC-Ed-Ack |
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) J. Ryoo, Ed. Request for Comments: 7271 ETRI Updates: 6378 E. Gray, Ed. Category: Standards Track Ericsson ISSN: 2070-1721 H. van Helvoort Huawei Technologies A. D'Alessandro Telecom Italia T. Cheung ETRI E. Osborne June 2014 MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection to Match the Operational Expectations of Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, Optical Transport Network, and Ethernet Transport Network Operators Abstract This document describes alternate mechanisms to perform some of the functions of MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) linear protection defined in RFC 6378, and also defines additional mechanisms. The purpose of these alternate and additional mechanisms is to provide operator control and experience that more closely models the behavior of linear protection seen in other transport networks. This document also introduces capabilities and modes for linear protection. A capability is an individual behavior, and a mode is a particular combination of capabilities. Two modes are defined in this document: Protection State Coordination (PSC) mode and Automatic Protection Switching (APS) mode. This document describes the behavior of the PSC protocol including priority logic and state machine when all the capabilities associated with the APS mode are enabled. This document updates RFC 6378 in that the capability advertisement method defined here is an addition to that document. Ryoo, et al. Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 7271 MPLS-TP LP for ITU-T June 2014 Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7271. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3. Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4. Capability 1: Priority Modification . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.1. Motivation for Swapping Priorities of FS and SF-P . . . . 6 4.2. Motivation for Raising the Priority of SFc . . . . . . . 7 4.3. Motivation for Introducing the Freeze Command . . . . . . 7 4.4. Procedures in Support of Priority Modification . . . . . 8 5. Capability 2: Non-revertive Behavior Modification . . . . . . 8 6. Capability 3: Support of the MS-W Command . . . . . . . . . . 8 6.1. Motivation for adding MS-W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 6.2. Terminology to Support MS-W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 6.3. Behavior of MS-P and MS-W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 6.4. Equal-Priority Resolution for MS . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 7. Capability 4: Support of Protection against SD . . . . . . . 10 7.1. Motivation for Supporting Protection against SD . . . . . 10 7.2. Terminology to Support SD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Ryoo, et al. Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 7271 MPLS-TP LP for ITU-T June 2014 7.3. Behavior of Protection against SD . . . . . . . . . . . . 11Show full document text