Skip to main content

Update to the IANA SSH Protocol Parameters Registry Requirements
RFC 9519

Document Type RFC - Proposed Standard (January 2024) Errata
Was draft-yee-ssh-iana-requirements (individual in sec area)
Author Peter E. Yee
Last updated 2024-10-04
RFC stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Formats
IESG Responsible AD Roman Danyliw
Send notices to (None)
RFC 9519


Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                            P. Yee
Request for Comments: 9519                                        AKAYLA
Updates: 4250, 4716, 4819, 8308                             January 2024
Category: Standards Track                                               
ISSN: 2070-1721

    Update to the IANA SSH Protocol Parameters Registry Requirements

Abstract

   This specification updates the registration policies for adding new
   entries to registries within the IANA "Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol
   Parameters" group of registries.  Previously, the registration policy
   was generally IETF Review, as defined in RFC 8126, although a few
   registries require Standards Action.  This specification changes it
   from IETF Review to Expert Review.  This document updates RFCs 4250,
   4716, 4819, and 8308.

Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9519.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the
   Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described
   in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction
     1.1.  Requirements Language
   2.  SSH Protocol Parameters Affected
   3.  Designated Expert Pool
   4.  IANA Considerations
   5.  Security Considerations
   6.  References
     6.1.  Normative References
     6.2.  Informative References
   Acknowledgements
   Author's Address

1.  Introduction

   The IANA "Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol Parameters" registry was
   populated by several RFCs including [RFC4250], [RFC4716], [RFC4819],
   and [RFC8308].  Outside of some narrow value ranges that require
   Standards Action in order to add new values or that are marked for
   Private Use, the registration policy for other portions of the
   registry was IETF Review [RFC8126].  This specification changes the
   policy from IETF Review to Expert Review.  This change is in line
   with similar changes undertaken for certain IPsec and TLS registries.

1.1.  Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

2.  SSH Protocol Parameters Affected

   The following table lists the "Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol
   Parameters" registries whose registration policy has changed from
   IETF Review to Expert Review.  Where this change applied to a
   specific range of values within the particular parameter, that range
   is given in the notes column.  Affected registries now list this
   document as a reference.

   +===============================+===========+=======================+
   |         Parameter Name        |    RFC    |         Notes         |
   +===============================+===========+=======================+
   |     Authentication Method     | [RFC4250] |                       |
   |             Names             |           |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |       Channel Connection      | [RFC4250] | 0x00000001-0xFDFFFFFF |
   |      Failure Reason Codes     |           |      (inclusive)      |
   |        and Descriptions       |           |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |     Compression Algorithm     | [RFC4250] |                       |
   |             Names             |           |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |      Connection Protocol      | [RFC4250] |                       |
   |     Channel Request Names     |           |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |      Connection Protocol      | [RFC4250] |                       |
   |         Channel Types         |           |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |      Connection Protocol      | [RFC4250] |                       |
   |      Global Request Names     |           |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |      Connection Protocol      | [RFC4250] |                       |
   |        Subsystem Names        |           |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |     Disconnection Messages    | [RFC4250] | 0x00000001-0xFDFFFFFF |
   |        Reason Codes and       |           |      (inclusive)      |
   |          Descriptions         |           |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |      Encryption Algorithm     | [RFC4250] |                       |
   |             Names             |           |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |     Extended Channel Data     | [RFC4250] | 0x00000001-0xFDFFFFFF |
   |    Transfer data_type_code    |           |      (inclusive)      |
   |            and Data           |           |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |        Extension Names        | [RFC8308] |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |      Key Exchange Method      | [RFC4250] |                       |
   |             Names             |           |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |      MAC Algorithm Names      | [RFC4250] |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |    Pseudo-Terminal Encoded    | [RFC4250] |                       |
   |         Terminal Modes        |           |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |      Public Key Algorithm     | [RFC4250] |                       |
   |             Names             |           |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |      Publickey Subsystem      | [RFC4819] |                       |
   |           Attributes          |           |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |      Publickey Subsystem      | [RFC4819] |                       |
   |         Request Names         |           |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |      Publickey Subsystem      | [RFC4819] |                       |
   |         Response Names        |           |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |         Service Names         | [RFC4250] |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |          Signal Names         | [RFC4250] |                       |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+
   |      SSH Public-Key File      | [RFC4716] | Excluding header-tags |
   |          Header Tags          |           |   beginning with x-   |
   +-------------------------------+-----------+-----------------------+

          Table 1: Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol Parameters Affected

   The only IANA SSH protocol parameter registries not affected are
   "Message Numbers" and "Publickey Subsystem Status Codes", as these
   remain Standards Action due to their limited resources as one-byte
   registry values.

3.  Designated Expert Pool

   Expert Review [RFC8126] registry requests are registered after a
   three-week review period on the <ssh-reg-review@ietf.org> mailing
   list, and on the advice of one or more designated experts.  However,
   to allow for the allocation of values prior to publication, the
   designated experts may approve registration once they are satisfied
   that such a specification will be published.

   Registration requests sent to the mailing list for review SHOULD use
   an appropriate subject (e.g., "Request to register value in SSH
   protocol parameters <specific parameter> registry").

   Within the review period, the designated experts will either approve
   or deny the registration request, communicating this decision to the
   review list and IANA.  Denials MUST include an explanation and, if
   applicable, suggestions as to how to make the request successful.
   Registration requests that are undetermined for a period longer than
   21 days can be brought to the IESG's attention (using the
   <iesg@ietf.org> mailing list) for resolution.

   Criteria that SHOULD be applied by the designated experts includes
   determining whether the proposed registration duplicates existing
   functionality (which is not permitted), whether it is likely to be of
   general applicability or useful only for a single application, and
   whether the registration description is clear.

   IANA MUST only accept registry updates from the designated experts
   and the IESG.  It SHOULD direct all requests for registration from
   other sources to the review mailing list.

   It is suggested that multiple designated experts be appointed who are
   able to represent the perspectives of different applications using
   this specification, in order to enable broadly informed review of
   registration decisions.  In cases where a registration decision could
   be perceived as creating a conflict of interest for a particular
   expert, that expert SHOULD defer to the judgment of the other
   experts.

4.  IANA Considerations

   This memo is entirely about updating the IANA "Secure Shell (SSH)
   Protocol Parameters" registry.

5.  Security Considerations

   This memo does not change the Security Considerations for any of the
   updated RFCs.

6.  References

6.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC4250]  Lehtinen, S. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH)
              Protocol Assigned Numbers", RFC 4250,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4250, January 2006,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4250>.

   [RFC4819]  Galbraith, J., Van Dyke, J., and J. Bright, "Secure Shell
              Public Key Subsystem", RFC 4819, DOI 10.17487/RFC4819,
              March 2007, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4819>.

   [RFC8126]  Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
              Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
              RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

   [RFC8308]  Bider, D., "Extension Negotiation in the Secure Shell
              (SSH) Protocol", RFC 8308, DOI 10.17487/RFC8308, March
              2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8308>.

6.2.  Informative References

   [CURDLE-MA]
              Turner, S., "Subject: [Curdle] Time to Review IANA SSH
              Registries Policies?", message to the Curdle mailing list,
              February 2021,
              <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/
              gdiOlZr9bnrZv8umVyguGG3woIM/>.

   [RFC4716]  Galbraith, J. and R. Thayer, "The Secure Shell (SSH)
              Public Key File Format", RFC 4716, DOI 10.17487/RFC4716,
              November 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4716>.

Acknowledgements

   The impetus for this specification was a February 2021 discussion on
   the CURDLE mailing list [CURDLE-MA].

Author's Address

   Peter E. Yee
   AKAYLA
   Mountain View, CA 94043
   United States of America
   Email: peter@akayla.com