IPR Search

Document search

IPR search

This search string must contain at least three characters, including at least one digit, and include punctuation marks. For best results, please enter the entire string, or as much of it as possible.

The material posted as IPR disclosures should be viewed as originating from the source of that information, and any issue or question related to the material should be directed to the source rather than the IETF. There is no implied endorsement or agreement by the IETF, the IESG or any other IETF entities with any of the material.

Back

Document IPR search results
rfc6247

Total number of IPR disclosures found: 0.

Total number of documents searched: 10.

Date ID Statement
Results for RFC 1106 ("TCP big window and NAK options")
No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on RFC 1106.
Results for RFC 1072 ("TCP extensions for long-delay paths"), which was obsoleted by RFC 6247 ("Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693 to Historic Status")
No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on RFC 1072.
Results for RFC 1110 ("Problem with the TCP big window option"), which was obsoleted by RFC 6247 ("Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693 to Historic Status")
No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on RFC 1110.
Results for draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize ("Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693 to Historic Status"), which was became rfc draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize ("Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693 to Historic Status")
No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize.
Results for RFC 6247 ("Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693 to Historic Status")
No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on RFC 6247.
Results for RFC 1693 ("An Extension to TCP : Partial Order Service"), which was obsoleted by RFC 6247 ("Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693 to Historic Status")
No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on RFC 1693.
Results for RFC 1379 ("Extending TCP for Transactions -- Concepts"), which was obsoleted by RFC 6247 ("Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693 to Historic Status")
No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on RFC 1379.
Results for RFC 1644 ("T/TCP -- TCP Extensions for Transactions Functional Specification"), which was obsoleted by RFC 6247 ("Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693 to Historic Status")
No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on RFC 1644.
Results for RFC 1145 ("TCP alternate checksum options"), which was obsoleted by RFC 1146 ("TCP alternate checksum options")
No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on RFC 1145.
Results for RFC 1146 ("TCP alternate checksum options"), which was obsoleted by RFC 6247 ("Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693 to Historic Status")
No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on RFC 1146.

Back