Liaison statement
Email Correspondence Between IETF Chair and TSB Director
Additional information about IETF liaison relationships is available on the
IETF webpage
and the
Internet Architecture Board liaison webpage.
State | Posted |
---|---|
Submitted Date | 2011-11-18 |
From Group | IESG |
From Contact | Russ Housley |
To Group | ITU-T-SG-15 |
To Contacts | Greg Jones <greg.jones@itu.int> |
Cc | The IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org> The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> Malcolm Johnson <malcolm.johnson@itu.int> Yoichi Maeda <yoichi.maeda@ttc.or.jp> The IETF <ietf@ietf.org> |
Response Contact | Russ Housley <chair@ietf.org> |
Technical Contact | Eliot Lear <elear@cisco.com> |
Purpose | For information |
Attachments | (None) |
Body |
The IESG would like to draw your attention to an email from the IETF Chair, Mr. Russ Housley, to the TSB Director, Mr. Malcolm Johnson. The email is fully supported by the IESG, and reads as follows: From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Date: November 15, 2011 5:23:15 AM EST To: Malcolm Johnson <Malcolm.Johnson@itu.int> Subject: Re: MPLS Dear Malcolm: http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/newslog/Statement+Ahead+Of+IETF+Meeting.aspx Thanks for getting this posted. It has already gotten a lot of visibility. Just to make sure that we are on the same page, I'd like to repeat two things that came up while we were drafting the newslog article. These also reflect the IETF's understanding of the newslog article. I'll forward this note to the IETF participants to be sure that we're all in sync here. First, the text of the newslog article re-affirms the JWT agreement from 2008 as captured in RFC 5317. In particular, the IETF standards process will continue to be used for all MPLS-TP architecture and protocol documents. Second, since G.8113.1 contains a protocol that is not a product of the IETF standards process, it cannot be a part of MPLS-TP according to the conditions of the JWT agreement and the newslog article. The IETF anticipates one of the following actions will be taken to conform to this agreement. Either (1) G.8113.1 will be withdrawn, or (2) the title of G.8113.1 will be changed, and the content will be revised to reflect that it is not included as part of MPLS or MPLS-TP protocol suite.. Also, thanks for sending me the TD527/P document from the SG15 Chairman. I note that it proposes the progression of both G.8113.1 and G.8113.2 as MPLS standards. This approach is not consistent with the JWT agreement or the newslog article. I believe this is a constructive step forward. I look forward to a resolution that fully respects the JWT agreement and moves our two organizations further toward collaborative standards development. Russ |