Liaison Statement to IETF PCE WG
|From||ITU-T SG 15 (Greg Jones)|
|To||IETF PCE WG (firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com)|
|Ccfirstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Response email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Attachments||Liaison Statement to IETF PCE WG|
Thank you for your positive response to our previous liaison statement. We look forward to continued cooperation on this work. As a result of the comments in your liaison statement we have drafted text to modify G.8080 that we plan to consent at the February 2006 meeting of SG 15. We have added a second route query interface to the routing controller component. This allows a routing controller to consult other routing controllers to resolve a route. We have also indicated that a routing controller component can contain either a path computation function, a routing database or both. These constructs were already present in G.7715.1. We believe that the ASON architecture is now aligned with your work on PCE. We would appreciate being kept informed on this topic.