Liaison statement
Re: ENUM and e164 domain management

State Posted
Posted Date 2006-08-30
From Group IAB
From Contact Leslie Daigle
To Group ITU-T-SG-2
To Contacts SG2 Counsellor
CcGary Richenaker
Scott Bradner
IAB
Response Contact Leslie Daigle
Purpose In response
Attachments (None)
Body
Richard,

The IAB would like to thank Q.1/2 for its input and reiterate
our commitment to coordinate with ITU-T TSB if there are
material changes planned that would affect e164.arpa .

For ourselves, we anticipate better coordination with ICANN
in the future, with respect to changes affecting .arpa (see
our correspondance to ICANN, from December 2005 [1]).

For your interest, we  have also enquired as to the state
of deployment of DNSSEC on .arpa zone (see [2]). For e164.arpa
we are about to send a similar enquiry to the RIPE NCC.

We remain happy to hear any comment Q.1/2 might have on these
or other topics.

Best regards,

Leslie.

Leslie Daigle
Chair, IAB.

[1] http://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence/2005-12-22-dot-arpa.html
[2]
http://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence/2006-05-15-IAB-request-to-IANA-to-sign-DNSSEC-zones.html

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: New Liaison Statement, "ENUM and e164 domain management"
> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 06:03:36 -0400
> From: Richard Hill "(ITU-T SG 2)" <tsbsg2@itu.int>
> Reply-To: SG2 Counsellor <richard.hill@itu.int>
> To: IAB Chair <iab-chair@iab.org>
> CC: SG2 Counsellor <richard.hill@itu.int>,      Gary Richenaker
<grichena@telcordia.com> > > > Title: ENUM and e164 domain management >
Submission Date: 2006-05-17 > URL of the IETF Web page:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/liaison_detail.cgi?detail_id=223 > Please
reply by 2007-01-15 > > From: Richard Hill(ITU-T SG 2) <tsbsg2@itu.int> > To:
IAB(IAB Chair <iab-chair@iab.org>) > Cc: > Reponse Contact: SG2 Counsellor
<richard.hill@itu.int> > Technical Contact: Gary Richenaker
<grichena@telcordia.com> > Purpose: For action > Body: As you are aware, the
issue of ENUM and the e164 domain management are of extreme importance to our
membership and Q.1/2 wants to express its appreciation for the liaison
regarding the update to the contact information in WHOIS for e164.arpa. > >
Q.1/2 wants to point out that we were made aware of the proposed settlement
agreement between ICANN and Verisign involving the management of .arpa TLD from
the ICANN website.  We understand that active negotiations are underway between
the contracting parties, but SG2 would like to be kept abreast of activities
that deal with the management of .arpa domain following a more formal liaison
notification process. > > We want to thank you for your consideration in this
matter and look forward to our continued cooperation. > Attachment(s): > No
document has been attached > > >