datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.3.0, 2014-04-12
Report a bug

Liaison Statement: OMA MWG-MEM SWG Liaison to the IETF LEMONADE WG

Submission Date: 2007-07-26
From: OMA (Dean Willis)
To: IETF LEMONADE Working Group (eburger@bea.com, gparsons@nortel.com)
Cc:lisa@osafoundation.org
chris.newman@sun.com
lemonade@ietf.org
Response Contact: Hubert Segond
Technical Contact: Hubert Segond
Purpose: In response
Attachments: PDF of original LS
Body:
1	Overview

This liaison is to update IETF LEMONADE on the progress in OMA MWG-MEM.
The
Liaison Statement sent by the IETF LEMONADE was presented to the OMA
MWG-MEM at
the Frankfurt OMA meeting in April, 2007. 

2	Proposal

The OMA MWG-MEM sub-working group would like to update you on our
progress. 
Please find below the status and links to the latest versions of the
relevant 
documents in the OMA MWG-MEM sub-working group:

-	The Requirements Document (MEM RD) has been approved as
“Candidate�.

http://www.openmobilealliance.org/ftp/Public_documents/REQ/Permanent_documents/OMA-RD-MobileEmail-V1_0-20051018-C.zip

-	The Architecture Document (MEM AD) is complete and in the process of
final review with the OMA Architecture working group.
	http://www.openmobilealliance.org/ftp/Public_documents/MWG/MEM/Permanent_documents/OMA-AD-Mobile_Email-V1_0_0-20070614-D.zip

-	The Technical Specification (MEM TS) development work has started.
	http://www.openmobilealliance.org/ftp/Public_documents/MWG/MEM/Permanent_documents/OMA-TS-Mobile_Email-V1_0-20070110-D.zip

A presentation on the current MEM AD and TS status will be made at the
upcoming 
IETF LEMONADE WG meeting in July 2007. 

Regarding ‘out-of-band’ notification on OMA Mobile Email, our
understanding is 
that there is no current plan to extend OMA Email Notification (EMN).
We are 
considering other options offered by the OMA Content Delivery (CD)
working 
group and other SDOs.

We are also in the process of rationalizing a limited mandatory set of
STI 
parameters for transcoding, and are currently looking at character set
translation into Universal Unicode format.


We are interested in the LEMONADE interoperability test cases and
results, and 
will gladly socialize them with the OMA IOP working group.

Finally, we are looking forward to updating you on our MEM AD and TS
work 
progress at the upcoming IETF LEMONADE meeting, July 2007, in Chicago.


3	Requested Action(s)

This Liaison Statement is in response to the previous Liaison Statement
sent by 
IETF LEMONADE WG to MWG-MEM SWG.  We would appreciate feedback on the
possible 
relevance of IETF LEMONADE work.

OMA MWG-MEM is happy to collaborate with the IETF LEMONADE WG in any
matter 
related to the Mobile Email activity.

4	Conclusion

OMA MWG-MEM would like to thank the IETF LEMONADE WG for their kind 
consideration of the present Liaison Statement and looks forward for
continued 
collaboration in the future.