Active Queue Management and Packet Scheduling (aqm) Concluded WG
Note: The data for concluded WGs is occasionally incorrect.
|WG||Name||Active Queue Management and Packet Scheduling|
|Area||Transport Area (tsv)|
|Dependencies||Document dependency graph (SVG)|
Charter for Working Group
Internet routers, lower-layer switches, end-host operating
systems, device drivers, and many types of additional
middleboxes include memory buffers in which they implement
queues to hold packets that require processing or otherwise
need to wait for forwarding to the next hop.
The queues are intended to absorb bursts of traffic that may
naturally occur, and avoid unneccessary losses. However, queues
also cause latency and jitter in the eventual arrival times of
packets. This can create issues and complications for interactive
Extremely large unmanaged buffers have been noticed in some
software and equipment. When these buffers start to fill,
interactive applications and other traffic can be severely
impacted or completely broken, due to high and potentially
The Active Queue Management and Packet Scheduling working group
(AQM) works on algorithms for managing queues in order to:
(1) minimize the length of standing queues, helping
to reduce delay for interactive applications
(2) help flow sources control their sending rates without
unnecessary losses, e.g., through Explicit Congestion
(3) consider the merits of various techniques to protect flows
from negative impacts of other more aggressive or misbehaving
(4) help avoid global synchronization of flows sharing a
The AQM working group will produce documents that cover the
design, use, configuration, and monitoring of algorithms for
managing queues in Internet devices and software. The scope
includes both how to best configure existing equipment and
software, as well as recommendations on designing new equipment
The AQM working group will also publish algorithm specifications
that are found to be broadly applicable and beneficial. Evaluating
these algorithms shall be done in coordination with the Internet
Congestion Control Research Group (ICCRG), and related IETF Working
Groups, such as the RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques Working
Group (RMCAT), in order to select and assess the relevant criteria,
scenarios, and metrics.
The working group will also explore the merits of whether to
isolate flows, and mechanisms for performing this function. Note
that isolation and potentially policing of flows implies some policy
beyond what is required to simply minimize queues. This topic
requires significant attention in the working group.
AQM algorithms do not have to be implemented universally in order
to be effective. Specifications will aid in producing proper
implementations that avoid potential ambiguities and corner cases.
"Interoperability" of algorithms and implementations of them is
not the reason for creating these specifications; correctness is
the primary motivation.
The working group will not make changes to existing IETF protocols,
but the working group may use Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN),
Diffserv, and other mechanisms maintained by the TSVWG working group.
Since the implementation of these mechanisms is likely to be entwined
with AQM algorithms, there is expected to be close coordination
between the TSVWG and AQM groups.
Many AQM algorithms have been proposed in academic literature, but
a smaller number are widely implemented and deployed. The goal of the
working group is to produce recommendations that will actually be used,
and algorithms that will actually be implemented, deployed in equipment,
and enabled. Towards these ends, the group actively encourages
participation from operators and implementers. Furthermore, the group
will jointly work with the Routing and Internet Area in order to
involve vendors of networking equipment in the development of the
Wider research and evaluation of AQM mechanisms shall be
coordinated with the IRTF/ICCRG, and significant participation in this
WG from the academic and research community is highly desirable, when
it is directly relevant to implementation and deployment.
Combined Queue Management / Packet Scheduling algorithms are in-scope,
provided their benefits have been evaluated against the established
requirements for an AQM algorithm. It is expected that some classes of
algorithms will focus on software implementations, while others on
existing or new hardware deployments, and algorithms may be specific
to distinct scenarios.
Submit first algorithm specification to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard
Submit AQM algorithm evaluation guidelines to IESG for publication as Informational
Submit AQM recommendations to IESG for publication, obsoleting RFC 2309