Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions
charter-ietf-cbor-03
Yes
No Objection
Erik Kline
Éric Vyncke
(Alissa Cooper)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Martin Duke)
(Martin Vigoureux)
- Ready for external review (00-01)
- Approve (00-03)
- Ready for external review (01-01)
- Approve (01-05)
- Ready for external review (02-00)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
Erik Kline
No Objection
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Comment
(2020-09-29 for -02-00)
Sent
The fourth paragraph contains a copy-pasta: "... part of a a second ..."
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment
(2020-10-07 for -02-01)
Not sent
+SACM as a CBOR consumer.
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2020-09-23 for -02-00)
Sent
The purpose of this recharter is to change "add to a second edition of the specification" to "progress them either in a standalone document or as part of a a second edition of the specification", giving the working group flexibility in document organization. (There are also minor editorial changes to the last paragraph of the charter.) I do not think this needs External Review.
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02-01)
Not sent
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2020-10-05 for -02-00)
Sent
It would be nice to see milestones for the remaining work.
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2020-10-06 for -02-01)
Not sent
The lists of consumers could be greatly expanded (DOTS, TEEP, SUIT, ...) if desired.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02-00)
Not sent
Martin Duke Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02-00)
Not sent
Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02-01)
Not sent
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
No Objection