Drone Remote ID Protocol
charter-ietf-drip-01
Yes
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Barry Leiba)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Suresh Krishnan)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Éric Vyncke
Yes
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-01)
Not sent
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2020-02-19 for -00-01)
Sent
Two questions about this: "* Requirements: the WG is expected to provide an informational document that lists the technical requirements for applying IETF protocols to the UAS Remote Identification (UAS RID) - that is the system for identifying UA during flight by other parties. These requirements will also include those associated to the UAS Identifier that need to both meet some constraints as well as some specific properties." Is UA distinct from UAS? The last sentence doesn't parse properly for me. What is the subject of "need to"? Is this saying "requirements ... need to ... meet some constraints ... [and meet] some specific properties"? What does that mean?
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-01)
Not sent
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-01)
Not sent
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2020-02-19 for -00-01)
Sent
Are the proposed milestones for WG adoption of drafts or the WG finishing them? (March 2020 seems very optimistic for the latter.) DRIP’s goal is to specify how RID can be made available in both Internet and local-only connected scenarios, especially in emergency situations. Some UAS Also to make RID trustworthy?
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-01)
Not sent
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-01)
Not sent
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2020-02-20 for -00-01)
Sent
Is the initial drafts list really needed in the charter? Also I agree about that the milestone for March 2020 is optimistic, assuming this is the date when work is supposed to be finished and not started? Then the other milestone is really unspecific. Maybe it better to add more milestones later (with AD approval) when it more clear what exactly the work is?
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-01)
Not sent