Drone Remote ID Protocol
charter-ietf-drip-01

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

Éric Vyncke Yes

Deborah Brungard No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

Comment (2020-02-19 for -00-01)
Two questions about this:

"* Requirements: the WG is expected to provide an informational document that
lists the technical requirements for applying IETF protocols to the UAS Remote
Identification (UAS RID) - that is the system for identifying UA during flight
by other parties. These requirements will also include those associated to the
UAS Identifier that need to both meet some constraints as well as some specific
properties."

Is UA distinct from UAS?

The last sentence doesn't parse properly for me. What is the subject of "need to"? Is this saying "requirements ... need to ... meet some constraints ... [and meet] some specific properties"? What does that mean?

Roman Danyliw No Objection

Benjamin Kaduk No Objection

Comment (2020-02-19 for -00-01)
Are the proposed milestones for WG adoption of drafts or the WG finishing them?
(March 2020 seems very optimistic for the latter.)

   DRIP’s goal is to specify how RID can be made available in both Internet and
   local-only connected scenarios, especially in emergency situations. Some UAS

Also to make RID trustworthy?

(Suresh Krishnan) No Objection

(Mirja Kühlewind) No Objection

Comment (2020-02-20 for -00-01)
Is the initial drafts list really needed in the charter? 

Also I agree about that the milestone for March 2020 is optimistic, assuming this is the date when work is supposed to be finished and not started? 

Then the other milestone is really unspecific. Maybe it better to add more milestones later (with AD approval) when it more clear what exactly the work is?

Barry Leiba No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov) No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection