Link State Routing
charter-ietf-lsr-01

[Ballot comment]
OLD:
3) YANG models for IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3 and extensions

NEW:
3) YANG models for the management IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3 and extensions

This might look like a picky editorial comment, but I want to make sure that not only configuration but also operational are covered, for the full management.

[Ballot comment]
I'm sorry I didn't notice this during internal review, but

"The LSR Working Group is formed by merging the isis and ospf WGs and will take on all their existing adopted work at the time of chartering"

will seem odd after the working group is chartered, because it's present/future tense. Just guessing, but perhaps something like

"The LSR Working Group was formed by merging the isis and ospf WGs and assigning all their existing adopted work at the time of chartering to LSR"

?

[Ballot comment]
"The LSR-WG will interact with other standards bodies that have responsibility
for standardizing IS-IS."

Can these be enumerated?

"The LSR Working Group will generally manage its specific work items by
milestones agreed with the responsible Area Director."

How is that different than for any other wg?

[Ballot comment]
Need to add TEAS in this sentence:
"LSR-WG will coordinate with CCAMP and BIER on
their extensions to the LSR IGPs as applicable to LSR protocol operation and
scale."