IAB Charter Update for RFC Editor Model
draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-09

Yes

Erik Kline
(Lars Eggert)

No Objection

Francesca Palombini
John Scudder
Murray Kucherawy
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
(Alvaro Retana)
(Benjamin Kaduk)
(Martin Duke)
(Robert Wilton)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

Erik Kline
Yes
Comment (2022-03-07 for -06) Not sent 
* Thanks to Bob Halley and Samita Chakrabarti for their INT and IOT
  directorate reviews, respectively.
Francesca Palombini
No Objection
Comment (2022-04-07) Not sent 
Thank you for this document.

Many thanks to Paul Kyzivat for his ART ART review: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/w8c6ThJ3wqShfjYbYPASaJg2W4k/, and
thanks to Brian for the reply including the context behind its track.

Francesca
John Scudder
No Objection
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Comment (2022-03-09 for -06) Sent 
I think the "Approval" chapter is unnecessary.
Paul Wouters
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2022-03-08 for -06) Not sent 
Thank you to Yoav Nir for the SECDIR review.
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Objection
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes) Yes
Yes (for -06) Not sent 

                            

                        
                    

                
            
        
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2022-03-07 for -06)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
It should be indicated somewhere that this document should be part of BCP 39.  My preference would be as an RFC Editor Note in the ballot/IESG Writeup.

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            (was Discuss)
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2022-03-13 for -07)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Sent for earlier
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
Clearing my DISCUSS in light of the RFC Editor note indicating that ISOC Board approval is necessary prior to publication.

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Martin Duke Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (for -06)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Not sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Robert Wilton Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2022-03-07 for -06)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
Hi,

   Note that RFC 2850 states that the RFC Editor appoints a liaison
   member to the IAB.  This does not change, but refers to the RFC
   Editor function as described in [I-D.iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model].

It isn't entirely clear to me exactly who (as in which person or body) is actually responsible for appointing a liaison member to the IAB (given, as per draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model, the RFC editor function responsibilities are split up into multiple entities).  My assumption is that this would be RSAB, but perhaps I mistaken.  Would it be helpful to clarify this - perhaps in draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model?

Rob