Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) Redirect and Reset Package
draft-foster-mgcp-redirect-05
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2004-09-15
|
05 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2004-09-10
|
05 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2004-09-10
|
05 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2004-09-10
|
05 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2004-08-20
|
05 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-08-19 |
2004-08-19
|
05 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2004-08-19
|
05 | Amy Vezza | [Note]: 'Please include this IESG note:  This document is being published for the information of the  community. It describes a non-IETF protocol that … [Note]: 'Please include this IESG note:  This document is being published for the information of the  community. It describes a non-IETF protocol that is currently being  deployed in a number of products. Implementers should be aware of  RFC 3015, which was developed in the IETF Megaco Working Group and  the ITU-T SG16, and which is considered by the IETF and the ITU-T to  be the standards-based (including reviewed security considerations)  way to meet the needs that MGCP was designed to address. ' added by Amy Vezza |
2004-08-19
|
05 | Jon Peterson | [Note]: 'Please include this IESG note: This document is being published for the information of the community. It describes a non-IETF protocol that … [Note]: 'Please include this IESG note: This document is being published for the information of the community. It describes a non-IETF protocol that is currently being deployed in a number of products. Implementers should be aware of RFC 3015, which was developed in the IETF Megaco Working Group and the ITU-T SG16, and which is considered by the IETF and the ITU-T to be the standards-based (including reviewed security considerations) way to meet the needs that MGCP was designed to address. ' added by Jon Peterson |
2004-08-19
|
05 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
2004-08-19
|
05 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Amy Vezza |
2004-08-19
|
05 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
2004-08-19
|
05 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand |
2004-08-19
|
05 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot comment] Use our MGCP IESG note rather than the RFC Editor IESG note |
2004-08-19
|
05 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin |
2004-08-19
|
05 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Margaret Wasserman has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-08-19
|
05 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-08-17
|
05 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
2004-08-16
|
05 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Russ Housley |
2004-08-16
|
05 | Russ Housley | [Ballot comment] Throughout the document: s/whatever.net/example.com/ |
2004-08-16
|
05 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
2004-08-13
|
05 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Scott Hollenbeck has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Scott Hollenbeck |
2004-08-13
|
05 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot comment] Example values provided in places like section 2.1 should use one of the example domain names described in RFC 2606. It would … |
2004-08-13
|
05 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot comment] Example values provided in places like section 2.1 should use one of the example domain names described in RFC 2606. |
2004-08-13
|
05 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
2004-08-13
|
05 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jon Peterson |
2004-08-13
|
05 | Jon Peterson | Ballot has been issued by Jon Peterson |
2004-08-13
|
05 | Jon Peterson | Created "Approve" ballot |
2004-08-13
|
05 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2004-08-13
|
05 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2004-08-13
|
05 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2004-08-13
|
05 | Jon Peterson | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-08-19 by Jon Peterson |
2004-07-31
|
05 | Jon Peterson | State Changes to Waiting for Writeup from Publication Requested by Jon Peterson |
2003-09-22
|
05 | Amy Vezza | Area acronymn has been changed to tsv from gen |
2003-09-22
|
05 | Michael Lee | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-09-18 by Michael Lee |
2003-09-18
|
05 | Jon Peterson | Shepherding AD has been changed to Jon Peterson from Harald Alvestrand |
2003-09-18
|
05 | Natalia Syracuse | Draft Added by Natalia Syracuse |
2003-07-23
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-redirect-05.txt |
2003-06-27
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-redirect-04.txt |
2003-06-02
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-redirect-03.txt |
2003-04-24
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-redirect-02.txt |
2002-12-02
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-redirect-01.txt |
2002-10-04
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-redirect-00.txt |