Problem statements and requirements of L2 CATS
draft-huang-cats-ps-and-requirements-of-l2-cats-02
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Huang , Bin Tan | ||
| Last updated | 2024-07-08 (Latest revision 2024-01-05) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The computing intensive parts of the customer premise equipment have been decoupled and migrated to the cloud, therefore the thin CPE remaining at customer premise needs to access its “avatar” virtual CPE in the cloud which could be deployed in multiple edge computing sites. This draft will illustrate a use case of L2 traffic steering in terms of dynamic computing and networking resource status, together with requirements for CATS as well as solution consideration with regard to particularly the difference from the L3 routing framework.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)