Skip to main content

BGP based Multi-homing in Virtual Private LAN Service
draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming-05

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: Matthew Bocci <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming@ietf.org, matthew.bocci@nokia.com, bess-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, bess@ietf.org, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com
Subject: Protocol Action: 'BGP based Multi-homing in Virtual Private LAN Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming-05.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'BGP based Multi-homing in Virtual Private LAN Service'
  (draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming-05.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the BGP Enabled ServiceS Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Alvaro Retana, Deborah Brungard and Martin
Vigoureux.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming/


Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   Relevant content can frequently be found in the abstract
   and/or introduction of the document.  If not, this may be 
   an indication that there are deficiencies in the abstract
   or introduction.

Working Group Summary

   Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting?
   For example, was there controversy about particular points 
   or were there decisions where the consensus was
   particularly rough? 

Document Quality

   Are there existing implementations of the protocol?  Have a 
   significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
   implement the specification?  Are there any reviewers that
   merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
   e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
   conclusion that the document had no substantive issues?  If
   there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
   what was its course (briefly)?  In the case of a Media Type
   Review, on what date was the request posted?

Personnel

   Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?  Who is the 
   Responsible Area Director?  If the document requires IANA
   experts(s), insert 'The IANA Expert(s) for the registries
   in this document are <TO BE ADDED BY THE AD>.'

IRTF Note

  (Insert IRTF Note here or remove section)

IESG Note

  (Insert IESG Note here or remove section)

IANA Note

  (Insert IANA Note here or remove section)

RFC Editor Note