Advertisement of Multiple Paths in BGP: Implementation Report
draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-implementation-00
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (idr WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 (latest revision 2015-02-02) | ||
| Replaces | draft-retana-idr-add-paths-implementation | ||
| Stream | IETF | ||
| Intended RFC status | Informational | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Reviews | |||
| Stream | WG state | Submitted to IESG for Publication | |
| Document shepherd | Russ White | ||
| Shepherd write-up | Show (last changed 2015-04-10) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired (IESG: Dead) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | Alvaro Retana | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-implementation-00.txt
Abstract
This document reports the results of an ADD-PATH implementation survey. The survey had 22 questions about implementations' support for advertising multiple paths in BGP. After a brief summary of the results, each response is listed. This document contains responses from six implementers who completed the survey. The editor did not use external means to verify the accuracy of the information submitted by the respondents. The respondents are considered experts on the products they reported on.
Authors
Alvaro Retana (aretana@cisco.com)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)