IANA Allocations for Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Protocols
draft-ietf-manet-iana-07
Yes
(Ross Callon)
No Objection
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Ward)
(Jon Peterson)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Russ Housley)
(Tim Polk)
Abstain
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was No Objection)
Yes
Yes
(2007-09-05)
Unknown
I basically agree with other comments and discusses that have been filed. Having said that, I support the idea of this document and the allocations; but I want to see how the protocols live on that same port number, or some statement that all further protocols will use that port number.
Ross Callon Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Chris Newman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-09-06)
Unknown
I agree with other discuss issues, particularly Tim's one. I trust those other ADs to hold their discuss votes as necessary.
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Ward Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-09-04)
Unknown
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 2: > Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the Mobile > Ad hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group Code points aren't allocated to working groups, they are allocated to protocols and applications. Suggest to rephrase this in the title, abstract and body of the document.
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-09-06)
Unknown
+1 to Lars' Comment. I understand why this document was proposed, but it needs more work.
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-09-05)
Unknown
Agree with Lar's DISCUSS, but happy to let him hold the DISCUSS
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Abstain
Abstain
(2007-10-26)
Unknown
I believe the process issue of responding to Sam Weiler's comments has been addressed so I'm clearly. I'll let those with real content discusses consider whether this draft should be approved.