Skip to main content

IANA Allocations for Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Protocols
draft-ietf-manet-iana-07

Yes

(Ross Callon)

No Objection

(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Ward)
(Jon Peterson)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Russ Housley)
(Tim Polk)

Abstain


Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2007-09-04)
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 2:
>  Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the  Mobile
>                  Ad hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group

  Code points aren't allocated to working groups, they are allocated to
  protocols and applications. Suggest to rephrase this in the title,
  abstract and body of the document.

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was No Objection) Yes

Yes (2007-09-05)
I basically agree with other comments and discusses that have been filed.

Having said that, I support the idea of this document and the allocations; but I want to see how the protocols live on that same port number, or some statement that all further protocols will use that port number.

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2007-09-06)
I agree with other discuss issues, particularly Tim's one.  I trust those
other ADs to hold their discuss votes as necessary.

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(David Ward; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2007-09-06)
+1 to Lars' Comment. I understand why this document was proposed, but it needs more work.

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2007-09-05)
Agree with Lar's DISCUSS, but happy to let him hold the DISCUSS

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) (was Discuss) Abstain

Abstain (2007-10-26)
I believe the process issue of responding to Sam Weiler's comments has been addressed so I'm clearly.
I'll let those with real content discusses consider whether this draft should be approved.