Mobile IPv4 Challenge/Response Extensions (Revised)
draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3012bis-05
Yes
(Margaret Cullen)
No Objection
(Alex Zinin)
(Allison Mankin)
(Bill Fenner)
(Jon Peterson)
(Mark Townsley)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
(Ted Hardie)
Abstain
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
Abstain
Abstain
(2006-02-16)
Unknown
The Gen-ART review from Elwyn Davies cuts very deep so like Sam, I will abstain. Summary of the review: ...this draft needs considerably more work to be a useful PS. There has to be some doubt, given the use of CHAP, whether it is *worth* devoting too much effort to it, but that is a decision for others. The overall impression that comes over from the document is a hurried attempt to patch up a crumbling edifice that maybe ought to be demolished and rebuilt differently. The convoluted logic described and the fact that it is extensions to, combinations of or realignments of about three other protocols makes it extremely difficult to see whether the whole thing could be correct - the additions since RFC3012 appear to be attempts to fix something that was pretty broken! Full review (actually of the previous version, but still applicable); http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/reviews/draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3012bis-04-davies.txt
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
Abstain
Abstain
(2006-02-15)
Unknown
I didn't like this for MIP6 and for the same reasons I cannot support it for MIP4. I understand it's already on the standards track so I'm not going to block the document.