Skip to main content

XDR: External Data Representation Standard
draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1832bis-06

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Margaret Wasserman
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Bill Fenner
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2006-02-13
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2006-02-09
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2006-02-09
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2006-02-09
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2006-02-09
06 Jon Peterson State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Jon Peterson
2005-10-28
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2005-10-28
06 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-10-27
2005-10-27
06 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bill Fenner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Bill Fenner
2005-10-27
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2005-10-27
06 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Margaret Wasserman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Margaret Wasserman
2005-10-27
06 Margaret Cullen
[Ballot discuss]
Are we expected to receive some sort of deployment report for elevation to STD?  I am familiar with XDR, and I know that …
[Ballot discuss]
Are we expected to receive some sort of deployment report for elevation to STD?  I am familiar with XDR, and I know that it is quite widely deployed, but I would have expected to see some representation from the WG about its level of deployment and the extent to which deployed implementations match this specification.
2005-10-27
06 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2005-10-27
06 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2005-10-27
06 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2005-10-27
06 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2005-10-27
06 Bill Fenner [Ballot discuss]
Is there an updated implementation report?  All I see is http://www.ietf.org/IESG/Implementations/XDR-implementation .
2005-10-27
06 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2005-10-26
06 Michelle Cotton IANA Follow-up comments:
It has been confirmed that the IANA will not be creating/maintaining a new registry.
2005-10-26
06 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman
2005-10-25
06 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2005-10-24
06 Russ Housley [Ballot discuss]
This document obsoletes RFC 1832.  This needs to be indicated in the
  Title Page Header and in the Abstract.
2005-10-24
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2005-10-24
06 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-10-20
06 Jon Peterson State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup::Point Raised - writeup needed by Jon Peterson
2005-10-20
06 Jon Peterson Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-10-27 by Jon Peterson
2005-10-20
06 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jon Peterson
2005-10-20
06 Jon Peterson Ballot has been issued by Jon Peterson
2005-10-20
06 Jon Peterson Created "Approve" ballot
2005-07-14
06 Jon Peterson State Changes to Waiting for Writeup::Point Raised - writeup needed from Waiting for Writeup by Jon Peterson
2005-07-14
06 Jon Peterson Point raised by Sam: is the implementation report still applicable? Waiting for response.
2005-06-17
06 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2005-06-15
06 Michelle Cotton
IANA Last Call Comments:
The IANA Considerations section (section 9) says the following:

  It is possible, if not likely, that new data types will …
IANA Last Call Comments:
The IANA Considerations section (section 9) says the following:

  It is possible, if not likely, that new data types will be added to
  XDR in the future. The process for adding new types is via a
  standards track RFC and not registration of new types with IANA.
  Standards track RFCs that update or replace this document should be
  documented as such in the RFC Editor's database of RFCs.

Does this mean that the IANA will NOT maintain a registry?  When new types are created through a standards track RFC, there will not be any IANA registrations?
Please confirm that the IANA will not be creating/maintaining a new registry.
2005-06-03
06 Michael Lee Last call sent
2005-06-03
06 Michael Lee State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Michael Lee
2005-06-03
06 Jon Peterson State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Jon Peterson
2005-06-03
06 Jon Peterson Last Call was requested by Jon Peterson
2005-06-03
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2005-06-03
06 (System) Last call text was added
2005-06-03
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2005-05-06
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1832bis-06.txt
2005-05-05
06 Jon Peterson State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Jon Peterson
2005-02-21
06 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested
2005-02-08
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1832bis-05.txt
2004-06-23
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1832bis-04.txt
2004-06-22
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1832bis-03.txt
2003-10-22
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1832bis-02.txt
2003-05-07
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1832bis-01.txt
2003-02-21
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1832bis-00.txt