Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE Usage in GMPLS-Controlled Networks
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-23

Yes

John Scudder

No Objection

Erik Kline
Jim Guichard
Murray Kucherawy
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Éric Vyncke
(Andrew Alston)
(Robert Wilton)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 21 and is now closed.

John Scudder
Yes
Erik Kline
No Objection
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Comment (2023-06-08 for -21) Sent 
The SHOULDs in Section 7.1 don't give any guidance about why an implementer might legitimately decide to deviate from the advice given in each case.  It would be very helpful to make this clear.
Paul Wouters
No Objection
Comment (2023-06-07 for -21) Sent 
NIT:

      title=New Flags in GMPLS-CAPABILITY TLV

The "title=" keyword leaked into the title
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2023-06-07 for -21) Not sent 
Thank you to Ivaylo Petrov for the SECDIR review.
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Objection
Comment (2023-06-07 for -21) Not sent 
Thanks for working on this specification. I haven't find transport related issues in my review.
Éric Vyncke
(was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2023-06-08 for -22) Sent 
Thank you for your work and for addressing my previous DISCUSS ballot (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/CkmRMfF6XpbAYuuS2Yp8EeHttqk/)

-éric
Andrew Alston Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -21) Not sent 

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Robert Wilton Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2023-06-08 for -21)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
Thanks for this document, and in particular including the manageability considerations and a reference to where any related configuration should be found (in future).  Otherwise, no comments.

Regards,
Rob