Use Cases for Localized Versions of the RPKI
draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases-06
Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (sidrops WG) | |
---|---|---|---|
Author | Randy Bush | ||
Last updated | 2019-05-02 (latest revision 2019-04-30) | ||
Replaces | draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases | ||
Stream | IETF | ||
Intended RFC status | Informational | ||
Formats | plain text pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex | ||
Reviews | |||
Stream | WG state | Submitted to IESG for Publication | |
Document shepherd | Chris Morrow | ||
Shepherd write-up | Show (last changed 2019-01-03) | ||
IESG | IESG state | IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed | |
Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
Consensus Boilerplate | Yes | ||
Telechat date |
Has 3 DISCUSSes. Has enough positions to pass once DISCUSS positions are resolved. |
||
Responsible AD | Warren Kumari | ||
Send notices to | Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net> | ||
IANA | IANA review state | IANA OK - No Actions Needed |
Network Working Group R. Bush Internet-Draft Internet Initiative Japan Intended status: Informational April 30, 2019 Expires: November 1, 2019 Use Cases for Localized Versions of the RPKI draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases-06 Abstract There are a number of critical circumstances where a localized routing domain needs to augment or modify its view of the Global RPKI. This document attempts to outline a few of them. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on November 1, 2019. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Bush Expires November 1, 2019 [Page 1] Internet-DraftUse Cases for Localized Versions of the RPKI April 2019 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Suggested Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3. What is 'Local' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4. Example Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5. Some Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 8. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1. Introduction Today RPKI-based Origin Validation, [RFC6811], relies on widespread deployment of the Global Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI), [RFC6480]. In the future, RPKI-based Path Validation, [RFC8205], will be even more reliant on the Global RPKI. But there are critical circumstances in which a local, clearly- scoped, administrative and/or routing domain will want to augment and/or modify their internal view of the Global RPKI. This document attempts to lay out a few of those use cases. It is not intended to be authoritative, complete, or to become a standard. It is informative laying out a few critical examples to help frame the issues. 2. Suggested Reading It is assumed that the reader understands the RPKI, see [RFC6480], the RPKI Repository Structure, see [RFC6481], Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs), see [RFC6482], and GhostBusters Records, see [RFC6493]. 3. What is 'Local' The RPKI is a distributed database containing certificates, CRLs, manifests, ROAs, and GhostBusters Records as described in [RFC6481]. Policies and considerations for RPKI object generation and maintenance are discussed elsewhere. Like the DNS, the Global RPKI tries to present a single global view, although only a loosely consistent view, depending on timing, Bush Expires November 1, 2019 [Page 2] Internet-DraftUse Cases for Localized Versions of the RPKI April 2019 updating, fetching, etc. There is no 'fix' for this, it is not broken, it is the nature of distributed data with distributed caches. There are critical uses of the RPKI where a local administrative and/ or routing domain, e.g. an end-user site, a particular ISP or content provider, an organization, a geo-political region, ... may wish to have a specialized view of the RPKI. For the purposes of this exploration, we refer to this localized viewShow full document text