Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases-05
review-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases-05-rtgdir-lc-bryant-2019-04-18-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2019-04-30
Requested 2019-03-21
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Authors Randy Bush
I-D last updated 2023-05-23 (Latest revision 2019-04-30)
Completed reviews Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stewart Bryant
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 06)
Result Has nits
Completed 2019-04-18
review-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases-05-rtgdir-lc-bryant-2019-04-18-00
This is a well written document.

There are a couple of nits that need addressing but otherwise it is ready to publish.

============

6.  Security Considerations

   Though the above use cases are all constrained to local contexts,
   they violate the model of a single global PKI, albeit to meet real
   operational needs.  Hence they MUST be implemented to assure the
   local constraint.

SB> I can see why RFC2119 language is used, and it seems correct to use it,
however Nits is complaining that there is no RFC2119 boilerplate.

=========

   [I-D.ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview]
              Lepinski, M. and S. Turner, "An Overview of BGPSEC",
              draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview-02 (work in progress), May
              2012.

SB> Nits asks if you mean this version or -08?