Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases-05

Request Review of draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2019-04-30
Requested 2019-03-21
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Authors Randy Bush
I-D last updated 2019-04-18
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -05 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stewart Bryant
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 06)
Result Has nits
Completed 2019-04-18
This is a well written document.

There are a couple of nits that need addressing but otherwise it is ready to publish.


6.  Security Considerations

   Though the above use cases are all constrained to local contexts,
   they violate the model of a single global PKI, albeit to meet real
   operational needs.  Hence they MUST be implemented to assure the
   local constraint.

SB> I can see why RFC2119 language is used, and it seems correct to use it,
however Nits is complaining that there is no RFC2119 boilerplate.


              Lepinski, M. and S. Turner, "An Overview of BGPSEC",
              draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview-02 (work in progress), May

SB> Nits asks if you mean this version or -08?