Skip to main content

Signaling System 7 (SS7) Message Transfer Part 3 (MTP3) - User Adaptation Layer (M3UA)
draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc3332bis-06

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Scott Hollenbeck
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2006-03-23
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2006-03-19
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2006-03-19
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2006-03-19
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2006-03-19
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza
2006-02-11
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2006-02-10
06 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] Position for Scott Hollenbeck has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Scott Hollenbeck
2006-02-10
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc3332bis-06.txt
2006-01-25
06 Jon Peterson State Change Notice email list have been change to lyong@ciena.com,kmorneau@cisco.com from lyong@ciena.com
2005-12-02
06 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-12-01
2005-12-01
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2005-12-01
06 (System) [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by IESG Secretary
2005-12-01
06 (System) [Ballot Position Update] New position, yes, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by IESG Secretary
2005-12-01
06 Michelle Cotton IANA Comments:
We understand this document to not have any new IANA Actions.
Should the references for these parameters be updated to be this document?
2005-12-01
06 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot comment]
This normative ref has been obsoleted

  [10] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646", RFC
        2279 …
[Ballot comment]
This normative ref has been obsoleted

  [10] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646", RFC
        2279
, January 1998.

Maybe better to point to latest RFC?

From MIB Doctor Mike Heard:
Abstract and front page need to say that it obsoletes RFC 3332.
2005-12-01
06 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Bert Wijnen
2005-12-01
06 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot comment]
This normative ref has been obsoleted

  [10] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646", RFC
        2279 …
[Ballot comment]
This normative ref has been obsoleted

  [10] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646", RFC
        2279
, January 1998.

Maybe better to point to latest RFC?
2005-12-01
06 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2005-12-01
06 Mark Townsley [Ballot comment]
Abstract is a bit heavy on SS7-specific acronyms.
2005-12-01
06 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley
2005-11-30
06 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2005-11-30
06 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2005-11-29
06 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2005-11-29
06 Scott Hollenbeck
[Ballot comment]
Is this document intended to obsolete RFC 3332?  The file name implies a relationship, but there's nothing in the text that makes …
[Ballot comment]
Is this document intended to obsolete RFC 3332?  The file name implies a relationship, but there's nothing in the text that makes the relationship clear.
2005-11-29
06 Scott Hollenbeck
[Ballot discuss]
The document uses "byte" in many places where "octet" is probably a more accurate description.  "Network byte order" is fine, but "40 bytes" …
[Ballot discuss]
The document uses "byte" in many places where "octet" is probably a more accurate description.  "Network byte order" is fine, but "40 bytes" (for example) would be better written as "40 octets" if 8-bit bytes are being assumed.
2005-11-29
06 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-11-29
06 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter
2005-11-28
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2005-11-28
06 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The security considerations say:
  >
  > Implementations MUST follow the normative guidance of RFC3788 on
  > the integration and usage …
[Ballot discuss]
The security considerations say:
  >
  > Implementations MUST follow the normative guidance of RFC3788 on
  > the integration and usage of security mechanisms in SIGTRAN
  > protocols.
  >
  However, RFC 3788 is not listed as a normative reference.  Please
  add the normative reference to RFC 3788.
2005-11-28
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2005-11-25
06 Sam Hartman
[Ballot comment]
I don't have sufficient background to understand this document well
enough to either review it or to evaluate existing reviews.  I cannot
gain …
[Ballot comment]
I don't have sufficient background to understand this document well
enough to either review it or to evaluate existing reviews.  I cannot
gain this background in time for this telechat.
2005-11-25
06 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman
2005-11-23
06 Jon Peterson State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Jon Peterson
2005-11-23
06 Jon Peterson Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-12-01 by Jon Peterson
2005-11-23
06 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jon Peterson
2005-11-23
06 Jon Peterson Ballot has been issued by Jon Peterson
2005-11-23
06 Jon Peterson Created "Approve" ballot
2005-10-06
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc3332bis-05.txt
2005-07-28
06 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2005-07-14
06 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2005-07-14
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2005-07-14
06 Jon Peterson Last Call was requested by Jon Peterson
2005-07-14
06 Jon Peterson State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Jon Peterson
2005-07-14
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2005-07-14
06 (System) Last call text was added
2005-07-14
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2005-06-06
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc3332bis-04.txt
2005-05-11
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc3332bis-03.txt
2005-05-05
06 Jon Peterson State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Jon Peterson
2004-10-27
06 Barbara Fuller Draft Added by Barbara Fuller in state Publication Requested
2004-10-14
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc3332bis-02.txt
2004-10-01
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc3332bis-01.txt
2004-04-22
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc3332bis-00.txt